【摘要】：現(xiàn)象學的創(chuàng)始人胡塞爾與哲學人類學的創(chuàng)始人普萊斯納之間有一段不太長的師生關系。由于普萊斯納在他學習的一開始就已經(jīng)具備了自己的思想體系,因而對胡塞爾的現(xiàn)象學持有懷疑與批判的態(tài)度。胡塞爾對普萊斯納的首要影響在于撇開所有理論,面向?qū)嵤碌囊?其次在于意識的意向性和先天本質(zhì)方面的主張。此外,胡塞爾的哥廷根講座"自然與精神"也對普萊斯納哲學人類學思想的形成有啟示作用。盡管哲學人類學曾受到胡塞爾和海德格爾的批評,從現(xiàn)象學到哲學人類學的發(fā)展也仍是《邏輯研究》發(fā)表以來胡塞爾現(xiàn)象學及隨之形成的現(xiàn)象學運動的兩個主要展開方向之一。這個方向帶有舍勒、普萊斯納的思想蹤跡;另一個方向則帶有海德格爾、伽達默爾的思想蹤跡,即從現(xiàn)象學到解釋學的發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:The relationship between the founder of phenomenology, Husserl, and the founder of philosophical anthropology, Plessner, is not long. As Plesner had his own ideological system at the beginning of his study, he held a skeptical and critical attitude towards Husserl's phenomenology. Husserl's primary influence on Plessner lies in putting aside all theories and facing the requirements of reality, followed by the intentionality of consciousness and the proposition of innate essence. In addition, Husserl Gottingen's lecture Nature and Spirit also enlightens the formation of Plessner's philosophical anthropology. Although philosophical anthropology has been criticized by Husserl and Heidegger, the development from phenomenology to philosophical anthropology is still one of the two main directions of Husserl's phenomenology and the accompanying phenomenological movement. In this direction, there is a trace of Scheler, Plessner's thoughts; in the other direction, there is a trace of Heidegger's, Gadamer's thought, that is, the direction of development from phenomenology to hermeneutics.
【作者單位】： 中山大學哲學系 中山大學現(xiàn)象學研究所;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金重大項目“《胡塞爾文集》中譯”(12&ZD124),項目負責人:倪梁康
【分類號】：B516.5
，

本文編號：2141874