發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-25 04:18

  本文選題：亞里士多德 + 辯證法��； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：亞里士多德哲學(xué)中蘊(yùn)涵著豐富的對(duì)立統(tǒng)一思想,值得學(xué)界對(duì)此深入研究。亞里士多德依據(jù)對(duì)立的激烈程度將對(duì)立區(qū)分為"相關(guān)者"對(duì)立、"相反者"對(duì)立、"具有和缺失者"對(duì)立以及"肯定和否定"對(duì)立四種基本形式。亞氏認(rèn)為,這四種對(duì)立之間不存在彼此轉(zhuǎn)化問(wèn)題,但在"相反者"對(duì)立和"具有與缺失者"對(duì)立自身中,分別存在著雙向轉(zhuǎn)化和單向轉(zhuǎn)化的可能。亞氏根據(jù)對(duì)立雙方的主體、轉(zhuǎn)化和依存情況區(qū)分前三種對(duì)立,并依據(jù)考察對(duì)象的不同區(qū)分了前三種對(duì)立與第四種對(duì)立。亞氏認(rèn)為,"肯定和否定"對(duì)立就是邏輯上的矛盾,它只存在于判斷之中。黑格爾曾對(duì)亞氏的矛盾律進(jìn)行過(guò)激烈批判,這是由于黑格爾沒(méi)有分清亞氏矛盾觀與其自身矛盾觀所致。黑格爾對(duì)于亞氏辯證思想的繼承主要體現(xiàn)在亞氏目的論中邏各斯與努斯精神的合一上。亞氏雖未明確提出"對(duì)立統(tǒng)一"這一組合范疇,但對(duì)"對(duì)立"和"統(tǒng)一"思想都進(jìn)行了較為詳盡的分析和闡述。亞氏出于回應(yīng)柏拉圖哲學(xué)、架構(gòu)自身哲學(xué)以及創(chuàng)立形式邏輯的需要才沒(méi)有將"統(tǒng)一"范疇作為重點(diǎn)來(lái)研究。亞氏通過(guò)研究希臘語(yǔ)法,從討論一般與個(gè)別關(guān)系中衍生出他的實(shí)體論,并且將對(duì)立統(tǒng)一思想運(yùn)用到各個(gè)領(lǐng)域的研究中。亞氏搜集廣泛的經(jīng)驗(yàn)素材,進(jìn)行深入的邏輯分析,使得他的對(duì)立統(tǒng)一思想擁有超出前人的豐富性和深刻性。
[Abstract]:Aristotle's philosophy contains abundant thought of unity of opposites, which is worthy of further study. Aristotle divided the opposition into four basic forms according to the intensity of the opposition: "relative", "opposite", "with and without" and "positive and negative". According to Aristotle, there is no transformation problem between the four kinds of opposites, but in the opposites of "opposite" and "with and without", there is the possibility of bidirectional transformation and one-way transformation, respectively. According to the subject of the opposite two sides, the author distinguishes the former three opposites from the other according to the different objects of investigation, and distinguishes the first three opposites from the fourth opposites according to the situation of transformation and dependence. According to Aristotle, the opposition between positive and negative is a logical contradiction, which exists only in judgment. Hegel criticized Archer's law of contradiction intensely because Hegel did not distinguish his contradiction view from his own. Hegel's inheritance of Aristotle's dialectical thought is mainly embodied in the unity of logos and Nuss' spirit in Asiatic teleology. Although Aristotle did not clearly put forward the category of "unity of opposites", he made a detailed analysis and elaboration of the thought of "opposites" and "unity". In order to respond to Plato's philosophy, to construct his own philosophy and to create formal logic, Aristotle did not focus on the category of unity. By studying Greek grammar, he derived his entity theory from the discussion of general and individual relations, and applied the idea of unity of opposites to the study of various fields. Aristotle collects a wide range of empirical materials and carries on in-depth logical analysis, which makes his thought of unity of opposites more abundant and profound than his predecessors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B502.233

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張守夫;;被遺忘的亞里士多德辯證法[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年04期

2 王孝哲;所有矛盾都是事物變化發(fā)展的動(dòng)力嗎?[J];江漢論壇;1998年08期

3 姚定一;亞里斯多德與黑格爾關(guān)于對(duì)立統(tǒng)一學(xué)說(shuō)的比較研究[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年05期

4 任厚奎;“對(duì)立統(tǒng)一”是亞里士多德哲學(xué)的重要組成部分[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1932055