食管胃結合部癌手術切除方式和淋巴結清掃效能的臨床研究
發(fā)布時間:2021-08-20 18:31
研究背景:食管胃結合部腺癌(Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction,AEG)基于Siewert分類外科治療共識:AEG-Ⅰ型經(jīng)胸食管次全切除治療,AEG-Ⅲ型經(jīng)腹全胃切除治療。AEG-Ⅱ 型與 Nishi 型 EGJ(Esophagogastric junction,EGJ)腺癌相對應,其淋巴結可以向胸腔和腹腔兩個方向轉移。臨床實踐中,胸外科醫(yī)生偏愛經(jīng)胸食管切除,而腹部外科醫(yī)生則更偏愛經(jīng)腹全胃切除。然而,兩種術式的切除程度和淋巴清掃范圍明顯不同。因此,EGJ癌的淋巴結清掃范圍是有爭議的。為了確定其最佳手術切除和淋巴結清掃范圍,我們采用淋巴結轉移率(Lymph node metastasis,LNM)乘以轉移患者的五年生存率(Overall survival,OS)計算了淋巴結清掃效能指數(shù)(Efficacy index,EI),EI=LNM(%)×5-year OS(%)。根據(jù)日本胃癌和食管癌協(xié)會淋巴結分類標準,基于LNM分為三類:LNM-1,LNM≥10%強烈推薦清掃;LNM-2,10%~5%弱推薦清掃;LNM-3,LNM<5%不推薦...
【文章來源】:南方醫(yī)科大學廣東省
【文章頁數(shù)】:102 頁
【學位級別】:博士
【部分圖文】:
圖2.食管胃結合部腺癌的外科切除和淋巴清掃范圍.AEG-丨推薦右胸入路食管切除(A),??AEG-1丨經(jīng)胸入路食管切除(B)和食管裂孔入路全胃切除(C)選擇困難,AEG-I1I推薦食??管裂孔入路全胃切除(D).??Fig.2?Surgical?approach.?For?Siewert?type?I.?right?transthoracic?esophagectomy?is?recommended??(A)?For?Siewert?type?II,?right?transthora?
III型AEG、近端胃癌、經(jīng)胸切除、鱗狀細胞癌、院內(nèi)死亡、姑息探查、單獨化??療和內(nèi)鏡切除。經(jīng)過上述排除,共納入348例Siewert?I丨腺癌患者。??Underwent?gastrectomy?(N=1918)??Underwent?THTG?and?THPG?(N=1081)??Sicwert?II?EGJ?adenocarcinoma?(N=348)??Nishi’s?classification?(N=306)??THTG?(N=148)?THPG?(N=158)??圖1-2納入流程圖??Fig.1-2?Selection?and?grouping?diagram?for?the?patients?with?EGJ?adenocarcinoma.??根據(jù)Nishi分類,EGJ癌對應于瘤體4cm以內(nèi)的Siewert?II型腺癌,“E-G”分??型可用于SiewertI]進一步細化。按照Nishi標準,另外42例患者被排除:腫瘤??大。荆矗埃恚、宏觀R2切除及隨訪數(shù)據(jù)不可用。最后,306名患者符合本研宂的??納入條件。所有SiewerUI按EGJ癌中心位置分為GE/E=G型或G型。根據(jù)胃切??13??
iatal?proximal?gastrectomy.?Type?GE?and?Type?G?according?to?Nishi’s?classification.??基于pTHM分期亞組分析顯示:THPG組患者較THTG組在IA-I1B期??(P=〇.〇44)和IIIA期(P=0.029)具有顯著生存優(yōu)勢;基于腫瘤大小亞組分析顯??示:THPG組患者較THTG組對于直徑勺Omm和>30mm腫瘤患者均有明顯的生??存優(yōu)勢(P=〇.〇〇〇);但IIIB期兩組無顯著差異(P=0.211)(圖1-4A?D)。??1.0-1 ̄n??1?THPG??狐??oe;??s?.?°'8i?????I0-6"?^^?|?〇.6-?I???l?^?|??W?0.4-?W?〇4?_??H-H ̄ ̄I-??0-2-?02-??〇-〇?n?1?i?1?i?1?i?1?i?'?i?'?i?' ̄?〇.〇?H?1?1?1?'?1?>?1?'?1?'?1??—??\?〇?10?20?30?40?50?60?g?〇?10?20?3?0?40?50?60??Months?Months??,oh\??08?4]??j0'6]?\?h?I??3?J?"I1--1?I?L_??W?0.4?H?I?\??w?0.4?-??1??I—^^??02?A?02-??〇.〇?H?:?i?■?i?1?i?1?i?1?i?1?i?〇.〇?H?1?i?1?i?'?i?:?i?'?i?■?i?'??0?10?20?30?40?50?60?0?10?20?30?40?50
【參考文獻】:
期刊論文
[1]Optimal treatment for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up[J]. Kei Hosoda,Keishi Yamashita,Hiromitsu Moriya,Hiroaki Mieno,Masahiko Watanabe. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017(15)
本文編號:3354014
【文章來源】:南方醫(yī)科大學廣東省
【文章頁數(shù)】:102 頁
【學位級別】:博士
【部分圖文】:
圖2.食管胃結合部腺癌的外科切除和淋巴清掃范圍.AEG-丨推薦右胸入路食管切除(A),??AEG-1丨經(jīng)胸入路食管切除(B)和食管裂孔入路全胃切除(C)選擇困難,AEG-I1I推薦食??管裂孔入路全胃切除(D).??Fig.2?Surgical?approach.?For?Siewert?type?I.?right?transthoracic?esophagectomy?is?recommended??(A)?For?Siewert?type?II,?right?transthora?
III型AEG、近端胃癌、經(jīng)胸切除、鱗狀細胞癌、院內(nèi)死亡、姑息探查、單獨化??療和內(nèi)鏡切除。經(jīng)過上述排除,共納入348例Siewert?I丨腺癌患者。??Underwent?gastrectomy?(N=1918)??Underwent?THTG?and?THPG?(N=1081)??Sicwert?II?EGJ?adenocarcinoma?(N=348)??Nishi’s?classification?(N=306)??THTG?(N=148)?THPG?(N=158)??圖1-2納入流程圖??Fig.1-2?Selection?and?grouping?diagram?for?the?patients?with?EGJ?adenocarcinoma.??根據(jù)Nishi分類,EGJ癌對應于瘤體4cm以內(nèi)的Siewert?II型腺癌,“E-G”分??型可用于SiewertI]進一步細化。按照Nishi標準,另外42例患者被排除:腫瘤??大。荆矗埃恚、宏觀R2切除及隨訪數(shù)據(jù)不可用。最后,306名患者符合本研宂的??納入條件。所有SiewerUI按EGJ癌中心位置分為GE/E=G型或G型。根據(jù)胃切??13??
iatal?proximal?gastrectomy.?Type?GE?and?Type?G?according?to?Nishi’s?classification.??基于pTHM分期亞組分析顯示:THPG組患者較THTG組在IA-I1B期??(P=〇.〇44)和IIIA期(P=0.029)具有顯著生存優(yōu)勢;基于腫瘤大小亞組分析顯??示:THPG組患者較THTG組對于直徑勺Omm和>30mm腫瘤患者均有明顯的生??存優(yōu)勢(P=〇.〇〇〇);但IIIB期兩組無顯著差異(P=0.211)(圖1-4A?D)。??1.0-1 ̄n??1?THPG??狐??oe;??s?.?°'8i?????I0-6"?^^?|?〇.6-?I???l?^?|??W?0.4-?W?〇4?_??H-H ̄ ̄I-??0-2-?02-??〇-〇?n?1?i?1?i?1?i?1?i?'?i?'?i?' ̄?〇.〇?H?1?1?1?'?1?>?1?'?1?'?1??—??\?〇?10?20?30?40?50?60?g?〇?10?20?3?0?40?50?60??Months?Months??,oh\??08?4]??j0'6]?\?h?I??3?J?"I1--1?I?L_??W?0.4?H?I?\??w?0.4?-??1??I—^^??02?A?02-??〇.〇?H?:?i?■?i?1?i?1?i?1?i?1?i?〇.〇?H?1?i?1?i?'?i?:?i?'?i?■?i?'??0?10?20?30?40?50?60?0?10?20?30?40?50
【參考文獻】:
期刊論文
[1]Optimal treatment for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up[J]. Kei Hosoda,Keishi Yamashita,Hiromitsu Moriya,Hiroaki Mieno,Masahiko Watanabe. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017(15)
本文編號:3354014
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/zlx/3354014.html
最近更新
教材專著