IPOM法預(yù)置疝補(bǔ)片對(duì)Miles術(shù)后造口旁疝的預(yù)防作用
[Abstract]:Objective: colorectal cancer patients are increasing year by year, in which low rectal cancer accounts for a high proportion. The current standard procedure for patients with low rectal and anal cancer is still Miles (abdominal perineum combined with rectal cancer radical resection) and is almost the only treatment that can be cured. The most important feature of this procedure is the establishment of artificial anus in the abdominal wall of the patient. Although the patient's life span is longer, the appearance of the fistula also brings a series of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, necrosis, infection, obstruction, stenosis and paracentesis hernia. Paracostomy hernia is a common complication after colostomy, and seriously reduces the postoperative quality of life. Because of the high incidence (up to 50%) of parastatal hernia and the complexity of surgical repair, it is very important to prevent the formation of paracentotomy hernia. There are many factors that affect the occurrence of paracentesis hernia, such as age, sex, obesity, malnutrition, chronic cough and so on. Although surgeons do a lot of work to prevent paracentesis hernia, its incidence remains high. Recent foreign studies have reported that strengthening the strength of abdominal wall around colostomy by implanting herniation patch can effectively prevent the occurrence of para-stomal hernia. In this study, Miles was performed in patients with low rectal cancer and Bard CK herniation patch was prepositioned at sigmoidostomy with IPOM method (peritoneal internal fixation) to explore the effect of preimplantation hernia patch on prevention of paracostomal hernia. Methods: from June 2014 to June 2015, 50 patients with low rectal cancer underwent Miles operation and underwent rectus sigmoidostomy from June 2014 to June 2015 were randomly divided into two groups, 25 patients in each group. IPOM method was used in the experimental group to preposition Bard CK professional herniation patch beside the abdominal wall orifice, while the control group finished the orifice making directly in the abdominal wall. There were 14 males and 11 females, aged 45-69 years, with an average age of 56.2 years, while in the control group, there were 13 males and 12 females, aged between 46 and 72 years, with an average age of 57.4 years. The site was selected and marked by the surgeon and the surgeon before operation. The postoperative opening was recorded and maintained by the orthopedic therapist. After operation, the abdominal band was fixed for 3 months, during which laughter and high-intensity manual labor were avoided. Postoperative follow-up, abdominal CT scan to confirm the occurrence of parastatal hernia. Results 50 patients were followed up for 18-30 months with an average of 26.8 months. There were 2 patients in the test group with abdominal wall foreign body sensation and local prickly pain. 1. 1 patients had peristomal dermatitis and recovered after symptomatic treatment. The other patients had no complications such as bleeding, infection, dermatitis and necrosis. In the control group, there were 2 cases of peristomal inflammation after operation, and recovered after symptomatic treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups was significantly higher than that in the control group (P 0.05). All the patients underwent physical examination, asked about the condition after discharge, and CT scan of the outpatient abdomen. Six patients in the control group were confirmed to have parastotomy hernia by CT scan, but no P0.05 was found in the trial group. Conclusion: IPOM preplacement of Bard CK hernia patch during Miles in patients with low rectal cancer can prevent the occurrence of perioperative hernia and does not increase the incidence of total complications. The technique of preimplantation hernia patch has great application prospect. It is necessary to carry out multi-center, large sample prospective randomized controlled studies in China, accumulate research data, and strive to promote the technology as soon as possible, so that patients can obtain better prognosis and quality of life.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:R735.37
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王新生,查潤(rùn)生,龍克艱,胡霜久;全直腸系膜切除術(shù)在Miles術(shù)中應(yīng)用[J];河北醫(yī)學(xué);2002年10期
2 朱紅;賈麗;丁艷;;低位直腸癌Miles術(shù)會(huì)陰部結(jié)腸套疊式人工肛門(mén)的護(hù)理體會(huì)[J];新疆醫(yī)學(xué);2008年05期
3 崔葉鈞;直腸癌Miles術(shù)會(huì)陰切口一期縫合的評(píng)價(jià)[J];河南腫瘤學(xué)雜志;2001年03期
4 王閩全;李雪玉;于冰;馬特;孫國(guó)輝;哈里木;;低位直腸癌Miles術(shù)后做會(huì)陰部結(jié)腸套疊式人工肛門(mén)20例體會(huì)[J];新疆醫(yī)學(xué);1996年02期
5 鄭秀蘭,于麗娟,李鳳華,張艷華;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后局部復(fù)發(fā)的彩色多普勒血流顯像研究[J];中華普通外科雜志;2000年11期
6 孫小飛;石磊;高志慧;;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后會(huì)陰切口一期縫合引流方法的選擇[J];中國(guó)普通外科雜志;2012年10期
7 耿嬌霞;老年人Miles術(shù)后切口感染的原因分析及防治對(duì)策[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期
8 何煒杰,胡浩,汪良,錢(qián)海鑫;直腸癌Miles術(shù)保留盆腔自主神經(jīng)的評(píng)價(jià)[J];蘇州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期
9 戴鵬;林云;;腹膜外人工肛門(mén)在Miles術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];實(shí)用臨床醫(yī)學(xué);2011年10期
10 渠時(shí)學(xué);謝光偉;丁碩;李青;馬祖泰;;腹膜外乙狀結(jié)腸造口術(shù)在腹腔鏡Miles術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];腹腔鏡外科雜志;2008年01期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前7條
1 鄭秀蘭;于麗娟;李鳳華;張艷華;;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后局部復(fù)發(fā)的彩色多普勒血流顯像的研究[A];2000全國(guó)腫瘤學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文集[C];2000年
2 邱英;張玉姬;;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后膀胱功能的恢復(fù)[A];河南省腫瘤全科護(hù)理學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)議資料匯編[C];2005年
3 楊瑾;莫開(kāi)維;陳榮波;;肛腸科Miles術(shù)腸造瘺口護(hù)理體會(huì)[A];貴州省中西醫(yī)結(jié)合學(xué)會(huì)肛腸學(xué)會(huì)第四屆學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)暨新技術(shù)學(xué)習(xí)班論文匯編[C];2010年
4 黃大年;劉德瀛;;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后人造肛門(mén)的臨床觀察[A];大腸肛門(mén)病論文匯編[C];2001年
5 梁葵;林春惠;;老年直腸癌Miles術(shù)后人工肛門(mén)并發(fā)癥的護(hù)理[A];全國(guó)腫瘤護(hù)理學(xué)術(shù)交流暨專題講座會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2007年
6 張國(guó)軍;張誼國(guó);;低位直腸癌Miles術(shù)后盆腔感染竇道形成3例報(bào)告[A];中西醫(yī)結(jié)合肛腸病研究新進(jìn)展[C];2000年
7 陳會(huì)林;尹和宅;;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后并發(fā)內(nèi)疝性腸梗阻的防治(附1例報(bào)告)[A];2011年浙江省肛腸外科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)暨結(jié)直腸肛門(mén)疾病診治新進(jìn)展學(xué)習(xí)班論文匯編[C];2011年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 向瑤;手輔助腹腔鏡技術(shù)在Miles術(shù)中盆底腹膜關(guān)閉的應(yīng)用[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年
2 羅世坤;盆底腹膜重建在腹腔鏡輔助Miles術(shù)中的臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年
3 劉國(guó)才;對(duì)比分析Miles術(shù)與保肛術(shù)治療低位直腸癌的臨床效果[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年
4 李君;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后會(huì)陰部切口愈合不良的多因素分析[D];廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué);2007年
5 王維強(qiáng);Miles術(shù)后造口旁疝22例臨床分析[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2013年
6 劉慶良;直腸癌Miles術(shù)后局部復(fù)發(fā)因素分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2253878
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/zlx/2253878.html