腹腔鏡輔助胃癌D2根治術(shù)治療進(jìn)展期胃癌的近期臨床療效觀察
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the safety, efficacy and clinical value of laparoscopic assisted D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: by retrospective analysis, the clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic assisted and open D2 radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in our hospital from October 2014 to November 2016 were collected, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study. There were 40 cases of laparoscopy and 40 cases of open group. The related indexes of the study were: sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, surgical resection range and postoperative stages, etc., the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the length of operation time, and so on. The postoperative recovery indexes such as the number of lymph nodes detected, the time of postoperative ventilation, the time of pulling out the peritoneal drainage tube, the days of postoperative hospitalization, and the postoperative complications occurred in the two groups. To evaluate the short-term clinical effect of laparoscopic assisted D2 radical operation for advanced gastric cancer. Results: there was no significant difference between the two groups in sex, age, tumor location, operation mode and postoperative pathological stage (P0. 05). The operative bleeding in the endoscopic group was less than that in the laparotomy group (P < 0.05). Compared with the laparotomy group, the laparoscopic group had the advantages of quick ventilation, early extubation and short hospital stay (P0. 05). The operative time in the laparoscopy group was significantly longer than that in the open group (P0. 05). There was no significant difference in lymph node detection and postoperative complications between the two groups (P0. 05) conclusion: laparoscopic assisted D2 radical gastrectomy has the advantages of less trauma and less bleeding. And it can reach the same degree of radical resection as traditional open surgery. It is safe and feasible that the postoperative ventilation is quick, the hospital stay is short, the complication rate is the same as the open operation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:R735.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 唐華;徐亞香;蔣國(guó)慶;;腹腔鏡輔助胃癌D2根治術(shù)圍手術(shù)期的護(hù)理[J];實(shí)用臨床醫(yī)藥雜志;2011年10期
2 張振翼;秦瑞峰;袁增江;孫廣新;霍浩然;;進(jìn)展期胃癌腹腔鏡D2根治術(shù)的臨床分析[J];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥導(dǎo)報(bào);2012年34期
3 呂志金;王鋼成;;D2根治術(shù)治療進(jìn)展期胃癌的臨床分析[J];中國(guó)現(xiàn)代藥物應(yīng)用;2013年13期
4 陳英慧;呂達(dá);王洋;;26例腹腔鏡胃癌D2根治術(shù)的研究[J];吉林醫(yī)學(xué);2011年10期
5 林文霖;許燕常;李志雄;謝雪茹;潘國(guó)烽;;腹腔鏡D2根治術(shù)與開(kāi)腹手術(shù)治療胃癌的比較研究[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期
6 方國(guó)吉;杜曉輝;寧寧;夏紹友;馬冰;楊華夏;劉慶;張鼎;;腹腔鏡輔助與開(kāi)腹遠(yuǎn)端胃癌D2根治術(shù)近期康復(fù)的對(duì)比研究[J];中華腔鏡外科雜志(電子版);2013年01期
7 朱元增;孫培春;吳剛;聶潔偉;張建成;閆文峰;李帥超;范金陽(yáng);李少英;;腹腔鏡輔助D2根治術(shù)治療遠(yuǎn)端進(jìn)展期胃癌的療效[J];中國(guó)老年學(xué)雜志;2013年19期
8 羅金輝;;進(jìn)展期遠(yuǎn)端胃癌行腹腔鏡D2根治術(shù)的近期療效評(píng)價(jià)[J];醫(yī)學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2014年07期
9 楊學(xué)堂;;微創(chuàng)遠(yuǎn)端胃癌D2根治術(shù)對(duì)進(jìn)展期患者的短期療效[J];實(shí)用癌癥雜志;2014年07期
10 陳大勇;黃源;林進(jìn)令;;開(kāi)胸器在遠(yuǎn)端胃癌D2根治術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)實(shí)用外科雜志;2010年02期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前7條
1 ;規(guī)范化胃癌D2根治術(shù)[A];湖北省胃腸腫瘤診治進(jìn)展研討會(huì)論文匯編[C];2010年
2 朱恒梁;蔣飛照;葉百亮;阮小蛟;;腹腔鏡輔助進(jìn)展期遠(yuǎn)端胃癌D2根治術(shù)[A];2011年浙江省微創(chuàng)外科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2011年
3 曾祥福;盛瑤環(huán);范琳峰;鄧偉;賴劍;曾翔輝;;腹腔鏡下進(jìn)展期胃癌D2根治術(shù)的臨床體會(huì)(附26例)[A];江西省第二屆胃腸外科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨江西省第十二次中西醫(yī)結(jié)合普通外科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2012年
4 牟一平;徐曉武;嚴(yán)加費(fèi);嚴(yán)煥軍;許斌;陳其龍;王松彪;周育成;;完全腹腔鏡胃癌D2根治術(shù)的臨床應(yīng)用[A];2009年浙江省外科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2009年
5 沙洪存;洪曉明;滕曉平;倪開(kāi)元;黃濤;王勇;葉曉明;張治基;王志炎;謝凱鋼;黃煒;汪東杰;竺水銀;徐鯤杰;郝龍;周小帥;;腹腔鏡胃癌D2根治術(shù)治療無(wú)漿膜層侵犯的進(jìn)展期胃癌129例報(bào)道[A];2013年浙江省外科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2013年
6 彭晉;周福祥;鐘亞華;戴靜;謝叢華;秦月娥;龔軍;熊斌;周云峰;;胃癌D2根治術(shù)后同步放化療的臨床研究[A];第9屆全國(guó)胃癌學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨第二屆陽(yáng)光長(zhǎng)城腫瘤學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2014年
7 章青;楊U,
本文編號(hào):2196667
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/zlx/2196667.html