天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁(yè) > 醫(yī)學(xué)論文 > 腫瘤論文 >

Holliday交叉識(shí)別蛋白在肝癌中高表達(dá)且與患者預(yù)后相關(guān)

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-01-29 04:09

  本文關(guān)鍵詞: Holliday 交叉識(shí)別蛋白 HJURP 肝細(xì)胞癌 出處:《大連醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文 論文類(lèi)型:學(xué)位論文


【摘要】:目的:檢測(cè)肝細(xì)胞癌組織中 HJURP(Holliday Junction Recognition Protein,Holliday交叉識(shí)別蛋白)的表達(dá)情況,探究其表達(dá)水平與預(yù)后的關(guān)系。方法:通過(guò)免疫組化、Westernblot、逆轉(zhuǎn)錄聚合酶鏈反應(yīng)和實(shí)時(shí)聚合酶鏈反應(yīng)等技術(shù)從蛋白和RNA水平上檢測(cè)HJURP的表達(dá)水平,運(yùn)用SPSS21.0(美國(guó))軟件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析。定性資料使用卡方檢驗(yàn)。定量資料的每組數(shù)據(jù)需先進(jìn)行正態(tài)檢驗(yàn),符合正態(tài)分布的使用T檢驗(yàn)或校正T檢驗(yàn),不符合正態(tài)分布的使用非參數(shù)檢驗(yàn)。先比較cancer組和paracancer組。再將cancer組的患者分別按照性別、年齡、是否有飲酒史、是否有肝炎或肝硬化、臨床分期、肝功能Child分級(jí)分為亞組。再對(duì)各個(gè)亞組的免疫組化、Westernblot、逆轉(zhuǎn)錄聚合酶鏈反應(yīng)和實(shí)時(shí)聚合酶鏈反應(yīng)進(jìn)行分析。通過(guò)電話(huà)隨訪(fǎng)的到每位患者的無(wú)病生存期、總生存期并進(jìn)行生存分析。結(jié)果:(1)PCR結(jié)果分析發(fā)現(xiàn)cancer組和paracancer組的Ct值分別是25.9652 ± 3.4866 和 31.1120± 7.3778。兩組的 ΔCt 值分別是 4.069821 ±4.6855 和8.7879±7.07246。兩組的ΔΔCt值分別是 8.4491±4.5554和 13.0779±7.0725。根據(jù)公式計(jì)算兩組的相對(duì)定量值分別是0.8774±4.0691和0.6674±2.4538,P0.001。PCR結(jié)果進(jìn)行亞組分析發(fā)現(xiàn)HJURP的表達(dá)和患者的性別、年齡、是否有肝炎或肝硬化病史、是否有飲酒史并無(wú)關(guān)系(P0.05)。但是根據(jù)臨床分期將患者分為Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期組,分別有14人,17人,9人,三組的Ct值分別是27.5474±1.3655、26.6135 ± 1.0607 和 19.1424±1.3527,P1-2=0.5760、P1-30.001、P2-30.001。三組的 ΔCt 值分別是 7.6850±0.3179、4.0306±0.3517 和-5.3967±0.7401,P1-20.001、P1-30.001、P2-30.001。三組的ΔΔCt值分別是11.8607±0.1803、9.4389±0.1750和 6.8622±0.5081,P1-20.001、P1-30.001、P2-30.001。三組的相對(duì)定量值分別是 0.0003±0.0001、0.0024±0.0008 和0.6321 ±0.2679,P1-2=0.998、P1-30.001、P2-30.001。根據(jù)患者肝功能 Child-Pugh分級(jí)將患者分為A級(jí)組、B級(jí)組、C級(jí)組,分別有11人,22人,7人,三組的Ct 值分別是 26.6322±1.6156、26.6855± 1.0166 和 18.6203±1.3778,P1-2=0.9760、P1-3=0.001、P2-30.001。三組的ΔCt 值分別是 8.1055±0.2907、3.6986±0.5547和-6.1414±0.6449,P1-20.001、P1-30.001、P2-30.001。三組的ΔΔCt 值分別是 12.0627±0.1831、9.5259±0.266 和 6.85728±0.6159,P1-20.001、P1-30.001、P2-30.001。三組的相對(duì)定量值分別是 0.0003±0.0001、0.0020±0.0006和0.8125±0.3141,P1-2=0.989、P1-30.001、P2-30.001。(2)WESTERN-BLOT分析結(jié)果顯示cancer組和paracancer組的灰度值分別是 1.2109±0.0660 和 0.7368±0.7503,P0.001。對(duì)腫瘤組患者的 WESTERN-BLOT亞組分析發(fā)現(xiàn)HJURP在蛋白水平上和性別、年齡、是否有肝炎或肝硬化病史、是否有飲酒史無(wú)關(guān)。和臨床分期(0.2645±0.1024、1.1362±0.1084、1.6556±0.1020,P1-20.010,P2-3=0.04,P11-30.01)、Child 分級(jí)(1.3286±0.0388、1.3253±0.0567、1.5776±0.1417,P1-2=0.973,P2-3=0.031,P1-3=0.055)。(3)免疫組化結(jié)果顯示cancer組的陰性、弱陽(yáng)性、中陽(yáng)性、強(qiáng)陽(yáng)性分別是7.5%、22.5%、27.5%、42.5%;paracancer組的陰性、弱陽(yáng)性、中陽(yáng)性、強(qiáng)陽(yáng)性分別是27.5%、27.5%、42.25%、2.75%(P0.001)。免疫組化的亞組分析發(fā)現(xiàn)HJURP在腫瘤組織中的表達(dá)水平和患者的性別(P=0.875)、年齡(P=0.092)、是否有飲酒史(P=0.461)、是否有肝炎或者肝硬化病史將(P=0.911)無(wú)關(guān)。但是和臨床分期(P0.001)和肝功能Child分級(jí)(P=0.026)密切相關(guān)。(4)生存分析顯示低表達(dá)組和高表達(dá)組的平均無(wú)進(jìn)展生存期分別是16.3740±1.1140月,14.2830±0.6210月,P=0.0400。但是低表達(dá)組和高表達(dá)組的平均總生存期差異不明顯。結(jié)論:(1)無(wú)論在RNA水平還是在蛋白質(zhì)水平上,腫瘤組織中的HJURP都要明顯高于癌旁組織。HJURP的表達(dá)水平和臨床分期和Child分級(jí)相關(guān),和性別、年齡、是否有飲酒史、是否有肝炎肝硬化史無(wú)關(guān)。(2)HJURP和患者的無(wú)病生存期相關(guān),但和總生存期關(guān)系不確定。
[Abstract]:Objective: to detect HJURP in hepatocellular carcinoma (Holliday Junction Recognition Protein, Holliday protein expression recognition), and explore the relationship between expression level and prognosis. Methods: by immunohistochemistry, Westernblot, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and real-time polymerase chain reaction technology from the detection of the expression levels of HJURP protein and RNA levels the use of SPSS21.0 (America) software was used for statistical analysis. The qualitative data using the chi square test. Each set of data for quantitative data must first carry on the normality test, with normal distribution using T test or calibration T test, is not in accordance with the normal distribution of the non parametric test. Comparing the cancer group and paracancer group. The patients in the cancer group respectively according to gender, age, whether there is a history of drinking, whether hepatitis or cirrhosis, clinical stage, Child classification of liver function is divided into sub groups. The immune sub group Group, Westernblot, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Through telephone follow-up to the disease-free survival of each patient, survival analysis and overall survival. Results: (1) the results of PCR analysis showed that cancer and paracancer groups Ct value respectively is 25.9652 + 3.4866 and 31.1120 + 7.3778. two group Ct values were 4.069821 + 4.6855 and 8.7879 + two 7.07246. group of delta delta Ct = 8.4491 + 4.5554 and 13.0779 + 7.0725. according to the formula of relative quantitative value of two groups were 0.8774 + 4.0691 and 0.6674 + 2.4538, P0.001.PCR results subgroup analysis showed that the expression of HJURP and the patients gender, age, whether there is a history of hepatitis or cirrhosis, if there is no relationship between drinking history (P0.05). But according to the clinical stage of the patients were divided into phase I, II, III group, there were 14 people, 17 people, 9 people, three group of Ct = 27.5474 + 1.3655,26.6135 + 1.0607 and 19.1424 + 1.3527, P1-2=0.5760, P1-30.001, P2-30.001. three group Ct values were 7.6850 + 0.3179,4.0306 + 0.3517 and -5.3967 + 0.7401, P1-20.001, P1-30.001, P2-30.001. three groups of delta delta Ct = 11.8607 + 0.1803,9.4389 + 0.1750 and 6.8622 + 0.5081, P1-20.001, P1-30.001. The relative quantitative P2-30.001. value of three groups were 0.0003 + 0.0001,0.0024 + 0.0008 and 0.6321 + 0.2679, P1-2=0.998, P1-30.001, P2-30.001. according to the Child-Pugh classification of liver function were divided into group A, B group, C group, there were 11 people, 22 people, 7 people, three group of Ct = 26.6322 + 1.6156,26.6855 + 1.0166 and 18.6203 + 1.3778, P1-2=0.9760, P1-3=0.001, P2-30.001. three group Ct values were 8.1055 + 0.2907,3.6986 + 0.5547 and -6.1414 + 0.6449, P1-20.001, P1-30.001, P2-30.001. three The delta delta Ct = 12.0627 + 0.1831,9.5259 + 0.266 and 6.85728 + 0.6159, P1-20.001, P1-30.001, P2-30.001. relative quantitative value of three groups were 0.0003 + 0.0001,0.0020 + 0.0006 and 0.8125 + 0.3141, P1-2=0.989, P1-30.001, P2-30.001. (2) WESTERN-BLOT analysis. The results showed that the gray scale of cancer group and paracancer group respectively 1.2109 + 0.0660 and 0.7368 + 0.7503, P0.001. of tumor patients of WESTERN-BLOT subgroup analysis found that HJURP at the protein level and gender, age, whether there is a history of hepatitis or cirrhosis, whether there is a history of drinking. And the clinical stage (0.2645 + 0.1024,1.1362 + 0.1084,1.6556 + 0.1020, P1-20.010, P2-3=0.04, P11-30.01, Child (grade) 1.3286 + 0.0388,1.3253 + 0.0567,1.5776 + 0.1417, P1-2=0.973, P2-3=0.031, P1-3=0.055). (3) immunohistochemistry results showed that cancer were negative, weak positive, positive and strong positive Were 7.5%, 22.5%, 27.5%, 42.5%; paracancer were negative, weak positive, positive and strong positive were 27.5%, 27.5%, 42.25%, 2.75% (P0.001). Immunohistochemical subgroup analysis showed that the expression level of HJURP in tumor tissues and patients' sex, age (P=0.875) (P=0.092) is there, drinking history (P=0.461), whether there is hepatitis or liver cirrhosis history (P=0.911). But the independent and clinical stage (P0.001) and Child classification of liver function (P=0.026) is closely related to (4). Survival analysis showed that low expression group and high expression group average progression free survival was 16.3740 + 1.1140 in August, 14.2830 + 0.6210 months, but the P=0.0400. low expression group and high expression group average overall survival was not significantly different. Conclusion: (1) both at the RNA level or at the protein level, the expression level and clinical tumor tissues are significantly higher in HJURP tissue adjacent to cancer.HJURP staging and Ch ILD grading correlation was not related to sex, age, drinking history, and history of hepatitis cirrhosis. (2) HJURP was associated with disease-free survival but not overall survival.

【學(xué)位授予單位】:大連醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:R735.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 Xiao-Fei Zhang;Xin Yang;Hu-Liang Jia;Wen-Wei Zhu;Lu Lu;Wei Shi;Hao Zhang;Jin-Hong Chen;Yi-Feng Tao;Zheng-Xin Wang;Jun Yang;Lian-Xin Wang;Ming Lu;Yan Zheng;Jing Zhao;Qiong-Zhu Dong;Lun-Xiu Qin;;Bcl-2 expression is a poor predictor for hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis of andropause-age patients[J];Cancer Biology & Medicine;2016年04期

,

本文編號(hào):1472481

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/zlx/1472481.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶(hù)ad361***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com
99精品国产自在现线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区区| 中文字幕高清免费日韩视频| 亚洲精品国产福利在线| 中文字幕日韩无套内射| 成人午夜爽爽爽免费视频| 亚洲一区二区三区三州| 久久经典一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久精品| 亚洲综合日韩精品欧美综合区| 国产熟女一区二区三区四区| 亚洲最新一区二区三区| 69老司机精品视频在线观看| 香蕉尹人视频在线精品| 国产精品福利精品福利| 日本精品最新字幕视频播放| 欧美日韩国产的另类视频| 最近的中文字幕一区二区| 国产又粗又长又大的视频| 日韩人妻免费视频一专区| 有坂深雪中文字幕亚洲中文| 在线日韩中文字幕一区| 欧美字幕一区二区三区| 久热99中文字幕视频在线| 国产亚州欧美一区二区| 久久99亚洲小姐精品综合| 国产传媒欧美日韩成人精品| 好吊妞视频这里有精品| 中文文精品字幕一区二区| 日韩成人高清免费在线| 亚洲天堂一区在线播放| 又黄又色又爽又免费的视频| 91麻豆视频国产一区二区| 国产又粗又猛又爽色噜噜| 国产免费自拍黄片免费看| 黑鬼糟蹋少妇资源在线观看| 国产日韩欧美综合视频| 久久国产成人精品国产成人亚洲| 亚洲综合色在线视频香蕉视频| 女同伦理国产精品久久久| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区三区|