本文選題：軍事人員 + 述情障礙��； 參考：《江蘇大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 目的：編制軍人述情障礙量表(MAS)并對(duì)其進(jìn)行信、效度檢驗(yàn)。 方法：通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)分析探討闡述情障礙的概念,結(jié)合問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法和個(gè)案訪談法,了解軍人述情障礙的具體表現(xiàn),構(gòu)建軍人述情障礙量表的結(jié)構(gòu)模型。結(jié)合理論模型、問(wèn)卷調(diào)查及訪談結(jié)果,參考現(xiàn)有述情障礙量表,編制條目,形成條目池。小樣本預(yù)測(cè)試,小組討論修改,結(jié)合專家評(píng)估,形成軍人述情障礙量表初稿,初量表設(shè)5個(gè)維度(情感表達(dá)障礙、情感體驗(yàn)缺失、軀體化傾向、外向性思維和情感應(yīng)對(duì)),共40個(gè)條目。隨機(jī)整群抽取901名軍人進(jìn)行測(cè)試,按取樣單位分為兩個(gè)樣本,分別進(jìn)行探索性因素分析和驗(yàn)證性因素分析；抽取其中63名被試,同時(shí)施測(cè)艾森克人格問(wèn)卷(成人版)(EPQ)、多倫多述情障礙量表(TAS-20)、中國(guó)軍人心理健康量表(CMMHS),并于2周后對(duì)其中47名被試進(jìn)行本量表的重測(cè),檢驗(yàn)量表的信度和效度。 結(jié)果：經(jīng)探索性因素分析修正獲得含有25個(gè)正式條目,由五個(gè)因子構(gòu)成,分別命名為：情感表達(dá)障礙、情感體驗(yàn)缺失、軀體化傾向、外向性思維和情感應(yīng)對(duì),另加一個(gè)含有5個(gè)條目的掩飾分量表,正式量表含有30個(gè)條目。探索性因素分析結(jié)果顯示,由25個(gè)條目構(gòu)成的5因子模型累計(jì)方差貢獻(xiàn)率達(dá)56.087%,數(shù)據(jù)分析的理論結(jié)構(gòu)與假設(shè)基本一致。驗(yàn)證性因素分析模型擬合優(yōu)度指數(shù)顯示：CMIN=465.515,DF=265,P=0.000,CMIN/DF=1.757,GFI=0.934,AGFI=0.920,IFI=0.936,TLI=0.927,CFI=0.935,RMSEA(90%置信區(qū)間)=0.038(0.032-0.044),數(shù)據(jù)擬合指標(biāo)基本符合標(biāo)準(zhǔn),其結(jié)構(gòu)的穩(wěn)定性和跨樣本的一致性較好�？偭勘鞢RONBACH'S A系數(shù)為0.883,各因子的CRONBACH'S A系數(shù)為0.648～0.752,P均0.01；總量表的分半系數(shù)為0.810,各因子的分半系數(shù)為0.642-0.725,P均0.01；總量表重測(cè)相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.791,各因子的重測(cè)相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.507-0.717,P均0.01。MAS各個(gè)因子之間及各因子與總量表存在顯著相關(guān),相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.479-0.845(P0.01)。MAS總分及各因子與TAS-20總分及多個(gè)因子間存在顯著正相關(guān),相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.252-0.787(P0.05或0.01)；與EPQ總分及P、E、N維度呈顯著性相關(guān),相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.261-0.712(P0.05或0.01)；與CMMHS絕大多數(shù)因子均呈顯著正相關(guān),相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.255-0.708(P0.05或0.01)。 結(jié)論：本研究初步完成了軍人述情障礙量表的編制工作,研究表明,軍人述情障礙量表的理論構(gòu)想與最終結(jié)果具有較高的一致性,量表結(jié)構(gòu)合理。量表的信度、效度符合心理測(cè)量學(xué)要求,可運(yùn)用于軍事心理學(xué)相關(guān)方面的研究。
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop the scale of alexithymia and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: through literature analysis, the concept of emotional disorder was discussed, and the specific manifestation of alexithymia was understood by questionnaire and case interview, and the structure model of military alexithymia scale was constructed. Based on the theoretical model, questionnaire and interview results, the current alexithymia scale is used to compile the items and form the item pool. Small sample prediction test, group discussion and revision, combined with expert evaluation, formed the first draft of the military alexithymia scale, which was divided into five dimensions (emotional expression disorder, lack of emotional experience, somatization tendency). Extroverted thinking and emotional coping, a total of 40 entries. A total of 901 military personnel were randomly selected and divided into two samples according to the sampling units, which were analyzed by exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis respectively, and 63 of them were selected. At the same time, Eysenck Personality questionnaire (adult version), Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS-20) and Chinese military mental health scale (CMMHSA) were used to test the reliability and validity of Eysenck Personality questionnaire (Eysenck Personality questionnaire). After 2 weeks, 47 subjects were re-tested to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: after exploratory factor analysis, 25 formal items were obtained, which were composed of five factors: emotional expression disorder, lack of emotional experience, somatization tendency, extroverted thinking and affective coping. The formal scale contains 30 items, plus a cover-up list of 5 items. The result of exploratory factor analysis shows that the cumulative variance contribution rate of the five-factor model consisting of 25 items is 56.087, and the theoretical structure of the data analysis is basically consistent with the hypothesis. The good fitting index of confirmatory factor analysis model shows that the coefficient of goodness of fit of the model is: CMINN 465.515 DFN 265U P0.000 / CMINP / DFN 1.757N GFI0. 934N AGFI0.920GGFI 0.936TLI0.927TLI 0.935RMSEA90% confidence interval 0.0385RMSEA90% confidence interval 0.03835REA90% confidence interval 0.038380.032-0.0440.The data fitting index basically conforms to the standard, and its structure stability and consistency across samples are better. The CRONBACH'S A coefficient of total quantity table is 0.883, the CRONBACH'S A coefficient of each factor is 0.648 ~ 0.752P, the split-half coefficient of total quantity table is 0.810, the split-half coefficient of each factor is 0.642-0.725p, the coefficient of re-test correlation of total quantity table is 0.791and the retest correlation coefficient of each factor is 0.507-0.717hp all 0.01.MAS. There was a significant correlation between the factors and the total amount table. The correlation coefficient was significant positive correlation between the total score of 0.479-0.845(P0.01).MAS and each factor and the total score of TAS-20 and multiple factors, the correlation coefficient was 0.252-0.787(P0.05 or 0.01g, the correlation coefficient was significantly correlated with the total score of EPQ and the N dimension of EPQ, the correlation coefficient was 0.261-0.712(P0.05 or 0.01g, and there was a significant positive correlation with most of the factors of CMMHS. The correlation coefficient was 0.255-0.708(P0.05 or 0.01g. Conclusion: this study has preliminarily completed the development of the military alexithymia scale. The research shows that the theoretical conception and the final result of the military alexithymia scale are in good agreement with the final results and the structure of the scale is reasonable. The reliability and validity of the scale meet the requirements of psychometrics and can be applied to the research of military psychology.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：E0-051

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 肖嘉麗;大學(xué)生生活事件、家庭功能與述情障礙的關(guān)系研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1874793