【摘要】：目的:評(píng)價(jià)雙能CT單能譜技術(shù)不同能級(jí)對(duì)3 mm及以下冠脈支架顯示的影響。方法:選取不同材質(zhì)7枚內(nèi)徑3 mm或2.5 mm支架,模擬冠脈血管模型,行雙源CT雙能量冠脈掃描,將獲得的兩種不同能量(100及140 k V)數(shù)據(jù)采用單能譜技術(shù)重建處理,分別得到60~140 ke V(間隔10 keV)及線(xiàn)性融合120 kV 10組圖像;對(duì)上述10組圖像進(jìn)行雙盲主觀評(píng)價(jià)以及包括支架內(nèi)徑差異、支架內(nèi)腔衰減和圖像噪聲的客觀評(píng)價(jià),統(tǒng)計(jì)分析各組間差異性。結(jié)果:圖像質(zhì)量主觀評(píng)分一致性良好(Kappa=0.833),80 keV組獲得的圖像質(zhì)量總評(píng)分最高,為31分,除與90 ke V組及120 k V組差異未達(dá)到統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義外(P均0.05),與其他各組間均有顯著統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P值均0.05);80 keV組支架內(nèi)徑差異值最低,為36.1%±3.7%,明顯低于其他各能級(jí)組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P值0.05);各組間支架管腔內(nèi)衰減差異未達(dá)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P=0.151)。80 keV組噪聲最低,為(12.51±1.27)HU,與其各組間均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P值0.05)。結(jié)論:對(duì)于3 mm及以下支架的評(píng)估,80 keV能級(jí)圖像重組獲得的圖像質(zhì)量最佳,更符合臨床工作需求,值得推薦使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the effects of different energy levels of dual energy CT single energy spectroscopy on the display of coronary stents under 3 mm and below. Methods: seven stents with 3 mm or 2.5 mm inner diameter of different materials were selected to simulate the coronary artery model. The two different energy sources (100 and 140 k V) were reconstructed by single energy spectrum technique. 10 groups of images with 60 ke V (interval of 10 keV) and 10 groups of linear fusion images were obtained, and the subjective evaluation of double-blind and objective evaluation including the difference of stent diameter, the attenuation of stent cavity and the image noise were carried out, and the differences among the 10 groups were statistically analyzed. Results: the total score of image quality was the highest in the group of 80 keV with good consistency of image quality (Kappa=0.833), with a score of 31. Except that there was no significant difference between 90keV group and 120kV group (P 0.05), there was significant difference (P 0. 05) between the other groups and other groups (P 0. 05). The difference of stent diameter in the 80 keV group was the lowest (36. 1% 鹵3. 7%), which was significantly lower than that in other energy level groups. The difference was statistically significant (P0. 05), and the difference in the attenuation of stent lumen was not up to statistical difference (P0. 151). 80 keV group had the lowest noise (12. 51 鹵1. 27) HUU, and there was statistical difference between each group (P 0. 05). Conclusion: the reconstruction of 80 keV energy level images with 3 mm or less scaffolds has the best image quality, which is more suitable for clinical work and is worthy of recommended use.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬第一醫(yī)院放射科;西門(mén)子醫(yī)療CT事業(yè)部;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R816.2;R541.4

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許兵;路鶴晴;田冰;陳超;王敏杰;;320排CT容積掃描法與螺旋掃描法在低心率冠狀動(dòng)脈成像中的對(duì)比研究[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年07期

2 姜玉蓉;李穎;楊俊;丁家望;陳智浩;滕林;李松;張炯;李莉;吳輝;呂志陽(yáng);;替羅非班在糖尿病合并冠脈三支病變患者PCI術(shù)后的應(yīng)用[J];廣東醫(yī)學(xué);2015年02期

3 翟峰;李泉;許昌;王萍;張成周;;雙源CT大螺距掃描模式在兒童胸部低劑量成像中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J];濱州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

4 晏沐陽(yáng);李建華;任巖東;周葉;;冠狀動(dòng)脈粥樣硬化斑塊進(jìn)展或消退的評(píng)估方法[J];中華老年心腦血管病雜志;2013年10期

5 田相亭;;心肌梗死伴多支血管病變患者非梗死相關(guān)動(dòng)脈處理時(shí)機(jī)的探討[J];嶺南心血管病雜志;2014年03期

6 任朝英;;64排螺旋CTA與DSA在冠狀動(dòng)脈造影中的診斷價(jià)值比較[J];檢驗(yàn)醫(yī)學(xué)與臨床;2014年24期

7 高瑩瑩;丁承宗;;MSCT在冠心病診斷中的研究進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合影像學(xué)雜志;2014年06期

8 張昊;李萍;李俊峰;;雙源CT對(duì)法洛四聯(lián)癥的診斷及術(shù)前評(píng)估價(jià)值[J];臨床合理用藥雜志;2014年14期

9 袁保鋒;李澄;李一鳴;李鄭;;智能最佳管電壓技術(shù)在128層螺旋CT全腹部檢查中應(yīng)用探討[J];生物醫(yī)學(xué)工程與臨床;2014年05期

10 龔梅林;楊慶軍;李康;;冠狀動(dòng)脈CT成像研究及新進(jìn)展[J];四川醫(yī)學(xué);2014年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 李彬寅;心臟支架植入術(shù)后一年復(fù)查：冠脈CT血管造影還是傳統(tǒng)血管造影？[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年

2 章盈;CT血管造影在評(píng)價(jià)冠狀動(dòng)脈支架內(nèi)再狹窄中的價(jià)值[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年

3 尹衛(wèi)華;冠狀動(dòng)脈CT血管成像低劑量及低對(duì)比劑研究[D];北京協(xié)和醫(yī)學(xué)院;2014年

4 張，

本文編號(hào)：2179719