本文選題：數(shù)字化X線攝影 + 兒童胸部　； 參考：《新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：比較四組兒童胸部數(shù)字化成像（DR）攝影的輻射劑量和圖像質(zhì)量，優(yōu)化兒童管電壓可行性。方法：該前瞻性研究被新疆大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)倫理審查委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)，由兒童本人或監(jiān)護(hù)人或家長簽訂知情同意書。把0至14歲4500例兒童被隨機(jī)分成低千伏(A)、中等千伏(B)、次高千伏組(C)及固定高千伏組（對(duì)照）進(jìn)行數(shù)字化成像（DR）攝影。納入研究4433例兒童胸部正位圖像；排除67例兒童胸部正位圖像，輻射劑量測(cè)量用劑量面積乘積（DAP）。五位放射科診斷醫(yī)生獨(dú)立盲法在工作站上用可視化分級(jí)分析評(píng)分（VGAS）評(píng)價(jià)圖像質(zhì)量。DAP和VGAS均值使用單因素方差分析進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理。結(jié)果：C組的DAP均值與低千伏組和中等千伏值的DAP均值比較有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P＜0.05)；C組的DAP均值低于對(duì)照組的DAP均值(P＜0.05)，C組的輻射劑量比對(duì)照組輻射劑量低了18.75%；B值的DAP均值與對(duì)照組的DAP均值比較沒有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P=0.976)；A組的DAP均值大于B值的DAP均值（P=0.000）。對(duì)照組的VGAS均值與A組、B組和C組的VGAS均值比較統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)有顯著差異（P=0.000、P=0.000和P=0.000）；B組與A組的VGAS均值比較沒統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)沒有差異(P=0.334)；C組的圖像質(zhì)量略差于B組和A組的圖像質(zhì)量，他們之間的VGAS均值有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P=0.008、P=0.049)。結(jié)論：C組的管電壓得到的輻射劑量和圖像質(zhì)量是我們可以接受的結(jié)果,并且我們建議應(yīng)用VGAS評(píng)價(jià)圖像質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:Aim: to compare the radiation dose and image quality of four groups of children with digital chest imaging (DRR), and to optimize the feasibility of tube voltage. Methods: the prospective study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Xinjiang University and informed consent was signed by the child, guardian or parent. 4500 children aged 0 to 14 years were randomly divided into three groups: low KV, medium KV, subhigh KV group and fixed KV group (control group). The chest orthographic images of 4433 children and 67 children were excluded, and the dose area product was used to measure the radiation dose. An independent blind method for five radiologists was used to evaluate the image quality by visual grading analysis (VGASA) on a workstation. The mean value of VGAS was evaluated by univariate ANOVA (ANOVA). Results the mean value of DAP in group C was significantly lower than that in group C (P < 0.05) and the mean value of DAP in group C was lower than that in group C (P < 0.05). The mean value of DAP of radiation dose in group C was 18.75g / L lower than that in group C (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the mean value of DAP in the control group. The DAP mean of group A was greater than that of group B (P < 0. 000). There were significant differences between the VGAS mean of the control group and the VGAS mean of group A and group C. There was no significant difference in the mean value of VGAS between group B and group A. There was no statistical difference in the mean value of VGAS between group B and group A the image quality of group C was slightly worse than that of group B and group A. There was a statistically significant difference in the VGAS mean between them, P0. 008 and 0. 049. Conclusion the radiation dose and image quality obtained from the tube voltage of group C are acceptable to us, and we suggest that VGAS be used to evaluate the image quality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：R816.92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賴愛平,龔方戚,章士正;兒童CT檢查射線劑量?jī)?yōu)化原則[J];中國兒童保健雜志;2005年04期

2 韓春慶;孟輝;吳慧釗;;DR攝影條件的制定與選擇[J];河北醫(yī)藥;2007年10期

3 吳春禹;;DR胸部攝影圖像質(zhì)量影響因素的分析[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2009年05期

4 王平;劉景鑫;呂巖;;CR圖像空間分辨率實(shí)驗(yàn)分析[J];吉林醫(yī)學(xué);2008年15期

5 吳光耀;雷皓;;CT檢查輻射風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的研究進(jìn)展[J];臨床放射學(xué)雜志;2008年07期

6 凌壽佳;農(nóng)俊彬;黃鄰彬;黃仲奎;龍莉玲;謝萍;張會(huì)敏;陳掌凡;宋瑞;李春燕;;實(shí)驗(yàn)豬胸部正位CR合理曝光條件研究[J];臨床放射學(xué)雜志;2010年05期

7 鄭鈞正;郭常義;吳凡;;讓醫(yī)療照射更好地造福于民[J];環(huán)境與職業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué);2009年06期

8 李利國;高菲;范偉英;;探討小兒X線胸片攝影技術(shù)與質(zhì)量控制[J];海南醫(yī)學(xué);2008年06期

9 岳林明;張海東;;CR系統(tǒng)的影像質(zhì)量控制措施的探討[J];中國輻射衛(wèi)生;2008年01期

10 崔若棣;趙建設(shè);劉勇;;數(shù)字化攝影在兒童胸部X射線檢查中的應(yīng)用[J];中國輻射衛(wèi)生;2010年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1937180