本文選題：CT + MRI��； 參考：《中國(guó)醫(yī)藥指南》2016年32期

【摘要】：目的探討MR與CT對(duì)梗阻性黃疸的診斷價(jià)值及意義。方法選取2013年6月至2015年6月行磁共振MR及CT掃描的60例梗阻性黃疸患者,對(duì)兩種影像學(xué)掃描結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較分析。結(jié)果 MR與CT掃描對(duì)膽道結(jié)石、膽系炎癥的定性診斷差異不大,但對(duì)膽管癌、膽管擴(kuò)張的定性診斷則MR明顯優(yōu)于CT;MR的診斷準(zhǔn)確率為95.0%,明顯高于CT83.3%(P0.05);MR與CT掃描診斷梗阻的良惡性正確率比較無明顯的差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論相對(duì)而言,MR診斷梗阻性黃疸的臨床價(jià)值較CT更勝一籌。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the diagnostic value and significance of Mr and CT in obstructive jaundice. Methods 60 patients with obstructive jaundice underwent Mr and CT scans from June 2013 to June 2015 were compared and analyzed. Results there was no significant difference between Mr and CT in the qualitative diagnosis of cholelithiasis and cholangitis, but there was no significant difference between Mr and CT in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. In the qualitative diagnosis of bile duct dilatation, the diagnostic accuracy of Mr was better than that of CTN Mr was 95.0, and the accuracy of Mr was significantly higher than that of CT83.3, P0.05Mr and CT scan in the diagnosis of obstruction. There was no significant difference between Mr and CT in the diagnosis of benign and malignant obstruction. Conclusion Mr imaging is better than CT in the diagnosis of obstructive jaundice.
【作者單位】： 遼寧省鳳城市中醫(yī)院;
【分類號(hào)】：R575;R445.2;R816.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李蔭山;杜曉炬;張書模;;鐵和銅測(cè)定對(duì)梗阻性黃疸的診斷價(jià)值[J];人民軍醫(yī);1987年12期

2 孫經(jīng)建,孫甲東;梗阻性黃疸的腎臟損害[J];實(shí)用外科雜志;1989年10期

3 楊麗;張俊祥;;64排螺旋CT對(duì)梗阻性黃疸的診斷價(jià)值[J];安徽醫(yī)學(xué);2010年11期

4 陳小平;磁共振膽胰管成像對(duì)56例梗阻性黃疸診斷的應(yīng)用[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生;2003年10期

5 施養(yǎng)德,秦劍，

本文編號(hào)：1889014