發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-22 02:14

  本文選題：食品安全 + 公共危機(jī)��； 參考：《山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：研究目的： 食品安全關(guān)系到廣大人民群眾的身體健康和生命安全，關(guān)系到國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展和社會(huì)的和諧穩(wěn)定，關(guān)系到國(guó)家和政府的形象。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化和區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化不斷發(fā)展，國(guó)際食品貿(mào)易不斷增長(zhǎng)，而屢屢發(fā)生的食品安全危機(jī)事件使食品安全成為國(guó)內(nèi)外貿(mào)易所關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)之一。通過(guò)對(duì)美國(guó)、英國(guó)、日本食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的對(duì)比分析，進(jìn)一步完善食品安全公共危機(jī)中的輿論監(jiān)督。分別通過(guò)統(tǒng)計(jì)分析、實(shí)證研究，探討食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督之不足并提出改進(jìn)方案。重點(diǎn)構(gòu)建食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督框架，從而推進(jìn)食品安全監(jiān)管體制的改革。 本文的研究結(jié)果對(duì)改善和提高人民生活質(zhì)量、保障公眾的身體健康、維護(hù)社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定、增加社會(huì)的經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力和促進(jìn)食品國(guó)際貿(mào)易都有極為重要的理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 研究方法： 本課題在國(guó)內(nèi)外已有相關(guān)研究的基礎(chǔ)上，以規(guī)制理論為背景，從社會(huì)性規(guī)制工具的研究入手，運(yùn)用歷史文獻(xiàn)考證法和歷史比較法來(lái)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外食品安全公共危機(jī)中的輿論監(jiān)督進(jìn)行比較分析。運(yùn)用實(shí)證分析法中的定性分析法、案例分析法、SWOT分析方法、Excel數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)、專家訪談和小組討論法等，實(shí)證探究了我國(guó)食品安全社會(huì)性規(guī)制工具中針對(duì)食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督方面存在之問(wèn)題。在此基礎(chǔ)上提出我國(guó)食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的框架設(shè)計(jì)，為食品安全監(jiān)管研究提供一個(gè)綜合維度的新視角。 研究結(jié)果： 第一部分：國(guó)外食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的比較分析 本文認(rèn)為引發(fā)食品安全公共危機(jī)，歸結(jié)到底是輿論監(jiān)督不到位，是媒體等輿論媒介不積極甚至沒(méi)有發(fā)揮作用的結(jié)果。 第二部分：近年來(lái)我國(guó)食品安全公共危機(jī)事件中輿論監(jiān)督的實(shí)證研究 1．食品安全問(wèn)題的監(jiān)督。首先，當(dāng)前輿論監(jiān)督相對(duì)全面的；其次，，時(shí)間上是連續(xù)的；再次，數(shù)量基本上體現(xiàn)了所報(bào)道問(wèn)題的嚴(yán)重性；第四，報(bào)道監(jiān)督不足會(huì)誤導(dǎo)公眾對(duì)問(wèn)題嚴(yán)重性的判斷。 2.食品安全公共危機(jī)實(shí)施輿論監(jiān)督的相關(guān)主要新聞媒體信息。較大的媒體都對(duì)食品安全公共危機(jī)進(jìn)行了輿論的相關(guān)監(jiān)督。 3.食品安全公共危機(jī)輿論監(jiān)督實(shí)施過(guò)程中的地區(qū)信息。首先，發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)的監(jiān)督事件較普通地區(qū)和欠發(fā)達(dá)區(qū)的數(shù)量明顯增大；其次，北京、廣東和上海比香港地區(qū)輿論監(jiān)督數(shù)量明顯多，但是并不能說(shuō)它們比香港地區(qū)的食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的體系完善。 第三部分：對(duì)我國(guó)“三鹿奶粉”事件進(jìn)行輿論監(jiān)督的實(shí)證研究 研究了我國(guó)輿論監(jiān)督的優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足。優(yōu)勢(shì)：彌補(bǔ)了常規(guī)食品安全公共危機(jī)事件中輿論監(jiān)督的不足；加強(qiáng)食品安全危機(jī)意識(shí)；促動(dòng)民眾參與食品安全危機(jī)的監(jiān)管；不足：忽略了輿論監(jiān)督的基本原則。 第四部分：在對(duì)比研究和實(shí)證研究的基礎(chǔ)上提出了我國(guó)食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的框架 在法律法規(guī)、媒體互動(dòng)、信息共享完備三大框架下，依次從戰(zhàn)略層面應(yīng)對(duì)、法律法規(guī)體系、行政授權(quán)模式、分層分類指導(dǎo)、事件性質(zhì)界定、公眾健康警報(bào)、危機(jī)溝通方式、信息傳遞渠道、情報(bào)公開(kāi)機(jī)制和新聞術(shù)語(yǔ)口徑十個(gè)方面，分析、研究，并構(gòu)建了我國(guó)食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督框架。 研究結(jié)論： 第一部分：依據(jù)國(guó)外食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的特點(diǎn)：1.媒體、政府和公眾三者結(jié)合起來(lái)，發(fā)揮應(yīng)有的監(jiān)督效果；2.注重建立獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)和舉報(bào)制度，讓其危機(jī)事件制止在萌芽狀態(tài)；3.開(kāi)展無(wú)償?shù)氖称钒踩逃R(shí)，宣傳食品安全法律知識(shí)，從而完善我國(guó)食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的策略。 第二部分：實(shí)證研究結(jié)論 1.食品安全問(wèn)題的監(jiān)督。(1)逐步加強(qiáng)其它食品安全問(wèn)題的報(bào)道監(jiān)督，防止類似食品添加劑的食品安全危機(jī)的再次大規(guī)模爆發(fā)；(2)建議輿論監(jiān)督應(yīng)保持持續(xù)性。 2.食品安全公共危機(jī)實(shí)施輿論監(jiān)督的相關(guān)主要新聞媒體信息。(1)提高輿論監(jiān)督的覆蓋面，拓展輿論監(jiān)督的渠道，實(shí)現(xiàn)大眾媒體和專門(mén)媒體相結(jié)合的輿論監(jiān)督；(2)全方位的進(jìn)行食品安全公共危機(jī)的報(bào)道、曝光和監(jiān)、指導(dǎo)。 3.食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督實(shí)施過(guò)程中的地區(qū)信息。(1)建議完善欠發(fā)達(dá)地區(qū)對(duì)食品安全危機(jī)報(bào)道和監(jiān)督的體系建設(shè)，實(shí)現(xiàn)創(chuàng)新模式；(2)關(guān)注農(nóng)村、關(guān)注基層、關(guān)注老百姓，為全國(guó)廣大人民服務(wù)；(3)建議大陸地區(qū)學(xué)習(xí)和研究香港的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。完善監(jiān)督體制，加強(qiáng)監(jiān)督力度，疏通監(jiān)督過(guò)程。 第三部分：進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)食品安全危機(jī)的輿論監(jiān)督。(1)貫徹公開(kāi)透明的原則；(2)實(shí)現(xiàn)及時(shí)報(bào)到；(3)建立整個(gè)行業(yè)的信任感；(4)媒體記者應(yīng)正確使用權(quán)力。 第四部分：構(gòu)建了我國(guó)食品安全危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的體系，從戰(zhàn)略層面應(yīng)對(duì)、法律法規(guī)體系、行政授權(quán)模式、分層分類指導(dǎo)、事件性質(zhì)界定、公眾健康警報(bào)、危機(jī)溝通方式、信息傳遞渠道、情報(bào)公開(kāi)機(jī)制和新聞術(shù)語(yǔ)口徑十個(gè)方面為確保食品安全、人類健康和社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定做出貢獻(xiàn)。 創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)： 在我國(guó)不時(shí)發(fā)生的食品安全公共危機(jī)事件，是市場(chǎng)失靈與管制失靈并存的情況下各種深層次矛盾的顯露。針對(duì)食品安全公共危機(jī)和輿論監(jiān)督的研究很多，但是將兩者有機(jī)的結(jié)合并提出我國(guó)食品安全公共危機(jī)中輿論監(jiān)督的框架設(shè)計(jì)的研究尚不多見(jiàn)。如何面對(duì)國(guó)情，在既定的制度框架下，研究中國(guó)特色的食品安全監(jiān)管之路，是本研究力圖創(chuàng)新之處。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the study is:
Food safety is related to the health and safety of the masses of the people, the healthy development of the national economy and the harmony and stability of the society, the image of the state and the government. With the continuous development of the economic globalization and regional economic integration, the international food trade is growing, and the food safety crisis has occurred repeatedly. Food safety has become one of the focus of domestic and foreign trade. Through the comparative analysis of public opinion supervision in the public crisis of food safety in the United States, Britain and Japan, the supervision of public opinion in the public crisis of food safety is further perfected. The shortcomings of public opinion supervision in the public crisis of food safety are discussed and discussed respectively through statistical analysis and empirical research. We should focus on building a framework of public opinion supervision in the public crisis of food safety, so as to promote the reform of food safety regulatory system.
The results of this study are of great theoretical and practical significance to improve and improve the quality of life of the people, to safeguard the health of the public, to maintain social stability, to increase the economic strength of the society and to promote the international trade in food.
Research methods:
On the basis of relevant research at home and abroad, this paper takes the theory of regulation as the background, starting with the research of social regulation tools, using historical literature examination method and historical comparison method to compare the public opinion supervision in the public food security crisis at home and abroad. The qualitative analysis method, case analysis method, SW The OT analysis method, the Excel database, the expert interview and the group discussion method, and so on, have proved the problems in the public opinion supervision of the food safety public crisis in our country's food safety social regulation tool. On this basis, the frame design of public opinion supervision in the public food safety crisis in China is put forward, and the research on the food safety supervision is studied. Provide a new perspective of a comprehensive dimension.
The results of the study:
Part one: comparative analysis of public opinion supervision in public crisis of food safety abroad.
This paper argues that the public crisis leading to food safety is due to the fact that media supervision is not in place, and that the media and other media are not active or even not functioning.
The second part: Empirical Research on public opinion supervision in China's food safety public crisis in recent years.
1. the supervision of food safety problems. First of all, the current supervision of public opinion is relatively comprehensive; secondly, the time is continuous; again, the quantity basically reflects the seriousness of the reported problems; fourth, the lack of coverage of the report will mislead the public to judge the serious problem.
2. the public crisis of food safety implements the main news media information about public opinion supervision. The larger media have conducted public opinion on the public crisis of food safety.
3. the regional information in the process of public opinion supervision and implementation of public crisis of food safety. First, the number of supervision events in developed areas is obviously larger than that in the common and underdeveloped areas; secondly, the number of public opinion supervision in Beijing, Guangdong and Shanghai is more obvious than that in Hongkong, but it can not be said that they are more than the food safety public crisis in the Hongkong region. The system of supervision by public opinion is perfect.
The third part: An Empirical Study of public opinion supervision of Sanlu milk powder incident in China.
The advantages and disadvantages of public opinion supervision in China are studied. Advantages are made up to make up for the lack of public opinion supervision in the common food safety crisis, strengthen the awareness of food safety crisis, promote the public participation in the supervision of food safety crisis, and ignore the basic principles of public opinion supervision.
The fourth part: on the basis of comparative study and empirical research, the framework of public opinion supervision in China's food safety public crisis is put forward.
Under the three frameworks of laws, regulations, media interaction and information sharing, the following ten aspects: the strategic response, the legal system, the administrative authorization model, the hierarchical classification guidance, the definition of the nature of the events, the public health alarm, the crisis communication mode, the information transmission channel, the information public opening system and the news terms caliber, and the analysis, research, and construction. The framework of public opinion supervision in China's food safety public crisis.
The conclusions are as follows:
The first part: according to the characteristics of public opinion supervision in the public crisis of foreign food safety: 1. media, the government and the public three together, play their due supervision effect; 2. pay attention to the establishment of incentive and reporting system, to stop the crisis in the germination state; 3. to carry out unpaid food safety education knowledge, publicity food safety law knowledge. Therefore, we should improve the strategy of public opinion supervision in the public crisis of food safety in China.
The second part: the conclusion of the empirical study
1. supervision of food safety issues. (1) gradually strengthen the supervision of other food safety issues and prevent a large-scale outbreak of food safety crisis like food additives. (2) it is suggested that the supervision of public opinion should remain persistent.
2. the public crisis of food safety implementation of public opinion supervision of the main news media information. (1) to improve the coverage of public opinion supervision, to expand the channel of public opinion supervision, to realize public media and special media to combine public opinion supervision; (2) a full range of reports of food safety public danger, exposure and supervision, guidance.
3. the regional information in the process of public opinion supervision and implementation in the public crisis of food safety. (1) recommending perfecting the system construction of the food safety crisis reporting and supervision in the underdeveloped areas and realizing the innovation model; (2) paying attention to the rural areas, paying attention to the grass-roots level, paying attention to the people and serving the people in the country, and (3) suggesting that the mainland should study and study the Hongkong classics Improve supervision system, strengthen supervision and dredge supervision process.
The third part: to further improve the supervision of public opinion on the crisis of food safety in China. (1) implement the principle of openness and transparency; (2) realize timely reporting; (3) establish a sense of trust in the whole industry; (4) media journalists should use power correctly.
The fourth part: Construction of the public opinion supervision system in the food safety crisis in China, from the strategic level, the legal system, the administrative authorization model, the stratified classification guidance, the definition of the nature of the event, the public health alarm, the crisis communication mode, the information transmission channel, the information public opening system and the news terminology caliber to ensure the food safety. All, human health and social stability make contributions.
Innovation point:
In our country, the public crisis of food safety occurs frequently in China, which is the exposure of various deep contradictions under the coexistence of market failure and control failure. There are many studies on the public crisis of food safety and the supervision of public opinion, but they combine the two and put forward the framework of public opinion supervision in the public food security crisis. The research is still rare. How to face the national conditions and study the way of food safety supervision with Chinese characteristics under the established institutional framework is the innovation of this research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：R155.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 郭鎮(zhèn)之;輿論監(jiān)督與西方新聞工作者的專業(yè)主義[J];國(guó)際新聞界;1999年05期

2 郭勝利;淺談重大食物中毒突發(fā)事件的處置[J];海峽預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年04期

3 孫多勇,魯洋;危機(jī)管理的理論發(fā)展與現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年04期

4 柳鵬程;馬強(qiáng);金國(guó)榮;陳金磊;趙玉;周子蓮;;消費(fèi)者的轉(zhuǎn)基因食品安全管理期望研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2006年06期

5 常建新;;淺議食品安全問(wèn)題背后的道德危機(jī)[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程技術(shù)(農(nóng)產(chǎn)品加工業(yè));2008年11期

6 葛曉春;戴立文;;危機(jī)管理理論述論[J];商丘師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

7 譚慧潔;劉耀中;;危機(jī)管理中組織結(jié)構(gòu)的構(gòu)建[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2006年03期

8 林華;;中國(guó)乳業(yè)的現(xiàn)狀及未來(lái)[J];中外企業(yè)文化;2009年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄒立海;食品安全危機(jī)預(yù)警機(jī)制研究[D];清華大學(xué);2005年

本文編號(hào)：2051088