本文選題：大學(xué)生 + 進(jìn)食態(tài)度問(wèn)卷��； 參考：《中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志》2015年02期

【摘要】：目的:在大學(xué)生樣本中對(duì)26個(gè)項(xiàng)目的進(jìn)食態(tài)度問(wèn)卷(EAT-26)進(jìn)行修訂,用以測(cè)量我國(guó)大學(xué)生的進(jìn)食態(tài)度。方法:選取2個(gè)大學(xué)生樣本(n1=801、n2=420),采用結(jié)構(gòu)效度、內(nèi)部一致性信度和組合信度對(duì)EAT-26中文版進(jìn)行評(píng)定。在樣本2中隨機(jī)選取147名大學(xué)生,完成進(jìn)食障礙量表(EDI-1)、情緒化進(jìn)食量表(EES)、負(fù)面身體自我量表的胖分量表(NPSS-F)和自我控制量表(SCS)以檢驗(yàn)效標(biāo)關(guān)聯(lián)效度;2周后,再選取其中112名大學(xué)生進(jìn)行重測(cè),檢驗(yàn)重測(cè)信度。結(jié)果:修訂后的問(wèn)卷共19個(gè)項(xiàng)目,包括節(jié)食、貪食與食物關(guān)注、食物內(nèi)容的知覺(jué)、代償行為等4個(gè)因子。驗(yàn)證性因素分析表明4因素模型擬合良好(χ2/df=2.93,GFI=0.91,CFI=0.90,NFI=0.85,TLI=0.88,RM SEA=0.07);EAT-19總分與EDI-1、EES、NPSS-F得分呈正相關(guān)(r=0.65、0.28、0.75,均P0.01),與SCS得分呈負(fù)相關(guān)(r=-0.31,P0.01)�？倖�(wèn)卷的Cronbachα系數(shù)為0.88,4個(gè)因子的α系數(shù)為0.66~0.87;總問(wèn)卷的重測(cè)信度為0.87,4個(gè)因子的重測(cè)信度為0.69~0.87。結(jié)論:本研究修訂后的19個(gè)項(xiàng)目的進(jìn)食態(tài)度問(wèn)卷(EAT-19)在大學(xué)生樣本中具有良好的效度和信度,可用于評(píng)估與進(jìn)食障礙相關(guān)的態(tài)度和行為。
[Abstract]:Objective: to measure the eating attitude of college students in China by revising the EAT-26 questionnaire of 26 items. Methods: two college students were selected to evaluate the Chinese version of EAT-26 by structural validity, internal consistency reliability and combined reliability. In the second sample, 147 college students were randomly selected to complete the eating Disorder scale (EDI-1), the emotional eating scale (EESN), the weight scale of the negative body self scale (NPSS-FN) and the self Control scale (SCSS) to test the validity of correlation between the two scales. Then 112 college students were selected to retest to test the reliability of retest. Results: there were 19 items in the revised questionnaire, including diet, gluttony and food concern, perception of food content and compensatory behavior. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four factor models fitted well (蠂 ~ 2 / dfg ~ (2.93) ~ 0.91) CFI ~ (0.90) ~ (0.90) ~ (-0.85) ~ (-1) RM SEA-0.07 ~ (-1) EAT-19 total score and EDI-1EESS-F score (r _ (0.65) ~ 0.280.280.75), all of which were negatively correlated with SCS score (r = -0.31) and P _ (0.01) P _ 0. 00.75 (P < 0. 01), and a negative correlation was found between the total score of EAT-19 and the score of EDI-1EESS-F (P < 0. 01). The Cronbach 偽 coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.88, the 偽 coefficient of the four factors was 0.660.87, the test-retest reliability of the total questionnaire was 0.87, and the test-retest reliability of the four factors was 0.69 / 0.87. Conclusion: EAT-19 of 19 items in this study has good validity and reliability in college students, and can be used to evaluate attitude and behavior related to eating disorders.
【作者單位】： 哈爾濱師范大學(xué)教育科學(xué)學(xué)院心理學(xué)系;哈爾濱師范大學(xué)學(xué)校心理教育研究基地;鐵力市職業(yè)教育中心;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R151.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王麗;馮景麗;高紅萍;胡鵬;;工作內(nèi)容量表在建筑行業(yè)職工中應(yīng)用的信度和效度[J];環(huán)境與職業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué);2010年03期

2 高俊嶺;賈英男;武曉宇;李光耀;戴俊明;傅華;;工作場(chǎng)所社會(huì)資本與健康關(guān)系的探索性研究[J];中國(guó)健康教育;2012年10期

3 李健,蘭亞佳,王治明,王綿珍,王明熾,劉國(guó)清;職業(yè)緊張量表(OSI-R)信度與效度驗(yàn)證[J];中華勞動(dòng)衛(wèi)生職業(yè)病雜志;2001年03期

4 李偉;柯繼紅;張俊權(quán);王生;;工作內(nèi)容量表在石油行業(yè)職工中應(yīng)用的信度和效度[J];實(shí)用預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2007年01期

5 孟亞軍;李寧秀;陳建華;錢(qián)足庶;宋焰超;;SF-36在中國(guó)HIV感染者中應(yīng)用的信度和效度[J];現(xiàn)代預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2007年13期

6 余善法,張銳,馬良慶,劉成,鄧育滄,谷桂珍;職業(yè)緊張測(cè)量工具研究[J];河南醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2000年02期

7 楊長(zhǎng)虹,王永彬,朱玉萍,馬建東,王志敏,馮景,李曉霞,孫全黨;200名中小學(xué)生試用中小學(xué)生團(tuán)體智力篩選測(cè)驗(yàn)調(diào)查報(bào)告[J];開(kāi)封醫(yī)專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

8 王惠珊;張建端;黃小娜;劉國(guó)艷;連光利;石淑華;;中國(guó)城市幼兒情緒及社會(huì)性發(fā)展量表標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的信度和效度分析[J];中國(guó)兒童保健雜志;2009年03期

9 李健,張學(xué)鋒,王治明;職業(yè)緊張研究的方法學(xué)[J];川北醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

10 蔡泳;施榕;黃紅;錢(qián)序;;高中生預(yù)防艾滋病量表的信度和效度分析[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2011年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1916554