本文選題：驅(qū)蚊帳 + 藥效　； 參考：《中華衛(wèi)生殺蟲(chóng)藥械》2016年06期

【摘要】：目的檢測(cè)驅(qū)蚊帳驅(qū)、滅蚊效果。方法按NY/T 1151.4-2012《農(nóng)藥登記衛(wèi)生用殺蟲(chóng)劑室內(nèi)藥效試驗(yàn)及評(píng)價(jià)第4部分驅(qū)蚊帳》開(kāi)展驅(qū)蚊帳室內(nèi)接觸筒藥效檢測(cè)和模擬現(xiàn)場(chǎng)藥效檢測(cè),對(duì)經(jīng)不同洗滌次數(shù)的驅(qū)蚊帳的藥效結(jié)果用SPSS11.5進(jìn)行χ2檢驗(yàn)和相關(guān)性分析。結(jié)果實(shí)驗(yàn)室接觸筒實(shí)驗(yàn)中,樣品1在經(jīng)0、10、20次洗滌后,對(duì)致倦庫(kù)蚊的1 h擊倒率為77.7%、28.8%和0,24 h致死率為57.9%、17.2%、0;樣品2則為91.8%、90.4%、74.7%和88.1%、80.3%、29.4%,不同洗滌次數(shù)間驅(qū)蚊帳對(duì)致倦庫(kù)蚊殺滅效果的差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。模擬現(xiàn)場(chǎng)實(shí)驗(yàn)中,樣品1和樣品2經(jīng)洗滌20次后對(duì)致倦庫(kù)蚊的12 h擊倒率分別為57.7%和29.9%,24 h死亡率分別為57.7%和29.9%。結(jié)論洗滌影響驅(qū)蚊帳的驅(qū)滅蚊效果,實(shí)驗(yàn)方法的統(tǒng)一有利于對(duì)驅(qū)蚊帳產(chǎn)品開(kāi)展效果評(píng)價(jià)。
[Abstract]:Objective to detect the effect of mosquito net drive and mosquito control. Methods according to NY/T 1151.4-2012, the laboratory efficacy test and evaluation of insecticides for public health use were carried out according to NY/T 1151.4-2012 part 4. The efficacy of indoor contact tube and simulated field efficacy test were carried out. The results of mosquito repellent account with different washing times were analyzed by 蠂 2 test and correlation analysis with SPSS11.5. Results in the laboratory contact tube test, sample 1 was washed after 20 times of washing. The 1-hour knock down rate of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus was 77.728% and the fatality rate was 57.9% and 17.20.The second sample was 91.8% and 80.3%, respectively. There were significant differences in the efficacy of mosquito nets for Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus among different washing times (P 0.05). In the simulated field experiment, the 12h knockdown rates of sample 1 and sample 2 were 57.7% and 29.90.24 h respectively after washing for 20 times to Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus, and the mortality rates were 57.7% and 29.9%, respectively. Conclusion washing affects the effect of mosquito repellent and the unification of experimental method is helpful to evaluate the effect of mosquito net.
【作者單位】： 南昌市疾病預(yù)防控制中心;
【分類號(hào)】：R184.31

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾鴻,梁志軒,張瑞琳,曹愛(ài)蓮,周國(guó)理,鐘作良;廣州市區(qū)致倦庫(kù)蚊對(duì)溴氰菊酯抗藥性現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[J];廣東寄生蟲(chóng)學(xué)會(huì)年報(bào);2000年00期

2 賈鳳龍,張秀梅,馮南貴,梁焯南,張韶華;深圳市致倦庫(kù)蚊季節(jié)變化規(guī)律[J];中國(guó)媒介生物學(xué)及控制雜志;2002年05期

3 楊頻,馬雅軍,廉振民;五種植物精油熏殺致倦庫(kù)蚊的效果[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年10期

4 賈春生;;致倦庫(kù)蚊感染堆集噬蟲(chóng)霉的癥狀及其病原形態(tài)觀察[J];中國(guó)媒介生物學(xué)及控制雜志;2010年04期

5 林壽遠(yuǎn);孔慶鑫;沈智勇;邱麗華;韋凌婭;倪曉平;;北海市致倦庫(kù)蚊對(duì)5種殺蟲(chóng)劑的抗藥性監(jiān)測(cè)[J];醫(yī)學(xué)動(dòng)物防制;2011年04期

6 何建國(guó);黃瓊;林海;晏許超;張燕;賈娉;;致倦庫(kù)蚊對(duì)常用衛(wèi)生殺蟲(chóng)劑抗藥性的研究[J];中華衛(wèi)生殺蟲(chóng)藥械;2011年05期

7 谷依露;高小峰;楊曉菁;葛臺(tái)明;;不同物理、化學(xué)因子對(duì)致倦庫(kù)蚊的引誘效果研究[J];中國(guó)媒介生物學(xué)及控制雜志;2012年02期

8 寧長(zhǎng)修;姚超群;石佑恩;;蘇云金桿菌H—14處理對(duì)致倦庫(kù)蚊發(fā)育及產(chǎn)卵影響的初步研究[J];醫(yī)學(xué)動(dòng)物防制;1991年02期

9 姚超群;致倦庫(kù)蚊吸血量的觀察[J];四川動(dòng)物;1992年01期

10 杜尊偉,顧云安,盧勇榮,朱國(guó)君;云南致倦庫(kù)蚊(Culex quinquefasciatus)對(duì)七種殺蟲(chóng)劑的抗性調(diào)查研究[J];醫(yī)學(xué)動(dòng)物防制;1995年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 羅曦霞;戴經(jīng)元;邱克輝;詹學(xué)明;喻子牛;;對(duì)庫(kù)蚊、伊蚊和按蚊幼蟲(chóng)高效芽胞桿菌的篩選[A];殺蟲(chóng)微生物[C];1992年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳群;致倦庫(kù)蚊氣味受體基因功能研究[D];海南大學(xué);2016年

2 楊曉羽;云南省楚雄州蚊蟲(chóng)及蚊媒病毒調(diào)查研究[D];大理學(xué)院;2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1908451