本文選題：眼壓測量 + ICARE回彈式眼壓計��； 參考：《新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：研究回彈式眼壓計與非接觸眼壓計在眼壓測量中的一致性,評價回彈式眼壓計的準確性。方法：選取2011年1月至2月就診于新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬第一附屬醫(yī)院的患共65例130眼。同時用ICARE回彈式眼壓計和NCT眼壓計進行眼壓測量,對比分析兩種眼壓計的測量結(jié)果及兩者的相關(guān)情況；觀察ICARE(?)眼壓計對特殊病例測量的結(jié)果。結(jié)果:ICARE眼壓計和NCT眼壓計測得的眼壓均值分別為15.45±8.54mmHg和16.60±7.54mmHg,兩者無顯著差別。兩種眼壓計測量值顯著相關(guān),相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.729；ICARE眼眼壓計可較好地完成角膜病變和無固視能力等病例的眼壓測量。分組后的結(jié)果：10-21mmHg組的RT和NCT結(jié)果為16.254±2.95mmHg和16.98±4.36mmHg；21～25mmHg組RT和NCT結(jié)果為23.34±4.34mmHg和24.28±5.70mmHg；25mmHg組RT和NCT結(jié)果為46.71±9.84mmHg和50.66±10.44mmHg,三組的結(jié)果均為P0.05,兩者測量值無顯著差異。兩種眼壓計測量值均數(shù)差值極小,雖然NCT的測量值較ICARE的高，，但無顯著的統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(表2)。結(jié)論：65例130眼用ICARE回彈式眼壓計和NCT同時完成了眼壓測量,結(jié)果表明兩種眼壓計測量值的統(tǒng)計分析沒有明顯差異。兩者具有良好的一致性。ICARE回彈式眼壓計在臨床上的應(yīng)用有其優(yōu)勢,對青光眼早期診斷、青光眼篩查具有一定鑒別有意義,其準確性和可重復(fù)性有待進一步研究。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the consistency of rebound IOP and non-contact IOP in intraocular pressure measurement and to evaluate the accuracy of rebound IOP. Methods: a total of 65 patients (130 eyes) in the first affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January to February 2011 were selected. At the same time, the IOP was measured by ICARE rebound IOP and NCT IOP, and the results of the two IOP were compared and analyzed. The result of a measurement of a particular case by an IOP. Results the mean IOP of the two groups were 15.45 鹵8.54mmHg and 16.60 鹵7.54mmHg, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. There was a significant correlation between the two kinds of IOP measurements. The correlation coefficient was 0. 729 and ICARE IOP could be used to measure the intraocular pressure in patients with corneal lesions and no solid vision. The results of RT and NCT were 16.254 鹵2.95mmHg and 16.98 鹵4.36mmHg, respectively. The results of RT and NCT were 23.34 鹵4.34mmHg and 24.28 鹵5.70mmHg respectively. The results of RT and NCT were 46.71 鹵9.84mmHg and 50.66 鹵10.44mmHg, respectively. The difference between the two IOP measurements was minimal, although the NCT value was higher than that of ICARE, but there was no significant statistical significance (Table 2). Conclusion Intraocular pressure was measured by ICARE rebound IOP and NCT in 65 cases (130 eyes). The results showed that there was no significant difference in statistical analysis between the two kinds of IOP measurements. There is good consistency between the two methods. ICARE rebound IOP has its advantages in clinical application. It is significant for the early diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma screening, and its accuracy and repeatability need to be further studied.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：R770.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 周和政,沈政偉,金中秋,王柏川,鄢俊杰;辯證地認識眼壓在青光眼診斷中的地位[J];美中國際眼科雜志;2002年02期

2 王瑾;周和政;楊帆;曾波;;PASCAL動態(tài)輪廓眼壓計臨床應(yīng)用的初步報告[J];國際眼科雜志;2008年03期

3 周和政;江文珊;張紹陽;晏穎;陳云輝;杜偉;;ICARE回彈式眼壓計與NCT眼壓計測量結(jié)果的比較[J];國際眼科雜志;2009年03期

4 傅偉才;張琳;;開角型青光眼患者晝夜眼壓監(jiān)測及其意義[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2007年09期

5 何躍;陳潔;呂紅彬;張曙光;李艷梅;袁援生;;iCare回彈式眼壓計與Goldmann壓平眼壓計測量結(jié)果的比較[J];眼科研究;2010年12期

本文編號：2038955