本文關(guān)鍵詞： 骨髓增生異常綜合征 TPO受體激動劑 羅米司亭 艾曲波帕 meta分析　出處：《山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的:應(yīng)用循證學(xué)評價TPO受體激動劑艾曲波帕和羅米司亭在骨髓增生異常綜合征中應(yīng)用的療效及安全性,為臨床提供可靠依據(jù)。方法:計算機檢索Pub Med、Cochrane圖書館、Embase數(shù)據(jù)庫;檢索時限:2000年至2017年2月。同時對美國血液學(xué)雜志、美國臨床腫瘤學(xué)會及歐洲血液學(xué)會收錄的會議論文及相關(guān)出版物文獻進行檢索。文獻包括TPO受體激動劑艾曲波帕和羅米司亭與安慰劑或者TPO受體激動劑聯(lián)合MDS治療藥物與安慰劑聯(lián)合MDS治療藥物對比的所有隨機對照試驗。對文獻進行數(shù)據(jù)提取及質(zhì)量評價,采用軟件Rev Man5.3和stata12.0進行統(tǒng)計分析;相對危險度(RR)及95%可信區(qū)間(CI)、加權(quán)均數(shù)差(WMD)或者標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化均數(shù)差(SMD)及95%可信區(qū)間(CI)分別對計數(shù)和計量資料進行評價。對異質(zhì)性進行檢驗,無異質(zhì)性或者異質(zhì)性較低用固定效應(yīng)模型,反之應(yīng)用隨機效應(yīng)模型。采用漏斗圖和Begg’s、Egger's檢驗對納入文獻偏倚性進行評估。結(jié)果:共檢索到7篇符合文獻,患者1003例。結(jié)果示:艾曲波帕及羅米司亭組在治療后血小板反應(yīng)率高于安慰劑組(38.8%/11.0%),但兩組差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義[RR=3.05,95%CI(0.78,11.92)P0.05]�；颊咴趹�(yīng)用艾曲波帕及羅米司亭后血小板輸注率低于安慰劑組(28.5%/32.4%),且兩組差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義[RR=0.79,95%CI(0.65,0.97)P0.05];患者在應(yīng)用艾曲波帕及羅米司亭后出血事件發(fā)生率低于安慰劑組(22.4%/32.0%),但兩組差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義[RR=0.71,95%CI(0.43,1.17)P0.05];嚴(yán)重出血事件發(fā)生率TPO受體激動劑組低于安慰劑組(5%/11.5%),且兩組差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義[RR=0.45,95%CI(0.23,0.89)P0.05];在CSTES事件發(fā)生率兩組差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義[RR=0.84,95%CI(0.66,1.07)P0.05]。TPO受體激動劑組與安慰劑組在不良事件、嚴(yán)重不良事件方面與安慰劑組相近分別為(96.0%/93.8%)、(47.4%/36.5%),相對危險度分別為[RR=1.03,95%CI(0.98,1.08)P0.05]、[RR=1.16,95%CI(0.81,1.65)P0.05];對于TPO受體激動劑會不會加重MDS病情進展,我們對MDS轉(zhuǎn)化AML率進行了評估:二者MDS轉(zhuǎn)化AML率相近(13.3%/12.0%)且兩組差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義[RR=1.24,95%CI(0.78,1.97)P0.05];TPO受體激動劑組與安慰劑組在總的死亡率(包括治療相關(guān)及其他原因)方面相近(34.4%/34.7%)兩組差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義[RR=0.95,95%CI(0.79,1.13)P0.05].結(jié)論:TPO受體激動劑在骨髓增生異常綜合征中有較好的療效,治療后血小板反應(yīng)率高于安慰劑組,血小板輸注率低于安慰劑組。且TPO受體激動劑的安全性較好;在不良事件和嚴(yán)重不良事件發(fā)生率方面與安慰劑組相近;在嚴(yán)重出血事件發(fā)生率方面要低于安慰劑組。Meta分析結(jié)果示:并沒有證據(jù)表明TPO受體激動劑會增加MDS轉(zhuǎn)化AML的風(fēng)險。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TPO receptor agonists Etrappa and Romistin in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods: Pub MedCochrane Library was searched by computer. Search time: 2000 to February 2017. Also for the American Journal of Hematology. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Hematology have been searched for articles on conference papers and related publications. The literature includes TPO receptor agonists Etrappa and Romistin with placebo or TPO receptor agonists. All randomized controlled trials of comparison of drugs in combination with MDS and placebo and MDS. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed in the literature. The software Rev Man5.3 and stata12.0 were used for statistical analysis. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the counting and measurement data respectively. The heterogeneity was tested. Fixed-effect model was used for non-heterogeneity or low heterogeneity, whereas stochastic effect model was used. Funnel graph and Begg's were used. Egger's test was used to evaluate the bias of the included literature. Results: a total of 7 articles were retrieved. The results showed that the platelet response rate in the atropa and romistin groups was higher than that in the placebo group (38.8% / 11.0%), but there was no significant difference between the two groups. [RRU 3.05 / 95 / CI0.78. The platelet transfusion rate was lower than that in the placebo group (28.5R / 32.4g), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. [RRX 0.79 ~ 95CIQ 0.65 0.97 (P0.05); The incidence of haemorrhage in patients treated with atropa and romistin was lower than that in placebo group (22. 4% vs 32. 0%), but there was no significant difference between the two groups. [RRX 0.71 ~ 95CIQ 0.43 ~ 1.17 (P0.05); The incidence of severe bleeding events in the TPO receptor agonist group was lower than that in the placebo group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. [There was no significant difference in the incidence of CSTES events between the two groups (P 0.05). [RRN 0.84 ~ 95CIN 0.660.07 (P0.05). TPO receptor agonist group and placebo group were in adverse events. The severity of adverse events was similar to that of the placebo group, and the relative risk was 96.0% / 93.8and 47.4% / 36.5%, respectively. [RRX 1.03 + 95% (P 0.05), [RRRL 1.16 ~ 95% ~ 0.81% ~ 1.65 ~ (-1) P _ (0.05); Whether TPO receptor agonists may aggravate the progression of MDS. We evaluated the conversion rate of MDS to AML: the rate of MDS transforming AML between the two groups was close to 13.3R / 12.0 and there was no significant difference between the two groups. [RRX 1.24 ~ 95% CI0.78 ~ 1.97% (P0.05); There was no significant difference between the TPO receptor agonist group and the placebo group in the total mortality (including treatment-related and other causes) between the two groups. [Conclusion the effect of TPO receptor agonist on myelodysplastic syndrome is better. After treatment, the platelet reaction rate was higher than that in the placebo group, and the platelet transfusion rate was lower than that in the placebo group, and the safety of TPO receptor agonist was better than that of the placebo group. The incidence of adverse events and severe adverse events was similar to that in the placebo group. There was no evidence that TPO receptor agonists increased the risk of AML transformation from MDS to AML as compared with the placebo group in terms of the incidence of severe haemorrhage events.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R551.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張順華;β_2受體激動劑的治療現(xiàn)狀[J];中華醫(yī)學(xué)信息導(dǎo)報;2004年01期

2 黎少林;合理使用β_2受體激動劑的現(xiàn)狀[J];中國綜合臨床;2000年07期

3 黃蔚,吳建洲;吸入性β_2—受體激動劑對老年喘息性支氣管炎患者心電活動的影響[J];廣西醫(yī)學(xué);2001年05期

4 徐治波;馮玉麟;;β_2受體激動劑的合理應(yīng)用評價[J];中國醫(yī)院用藥評價與分析;2007年05期

5 葉金朝;β_2受體激動劑對某些物質(zhì)代謝的影響[J];藥物流行病學(xué)雜志;1994年01期

6 蔡栩栩;β_2受體激動劑及其應(yīng)用[J];實用鄉(xiāng)村醫(yī)生雜志;1997年06期

7 顧明;趙杰東;徐芳雄;;選擇性β2受體激動劑的發(fā)展與臨床應(yīng)用[J];西南軍醫(yī);2008年05期

8 孫春鵬;趙學(xué)琴;;吸入激素聯(lián)合長效β_2受體激動劑治療支氣管哮喘急性發(fā)作對血管內(nèi)皮生長因子的觀察[J];實用預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2009年01期

9 賈薇;李偉;宮平;;法呢醇X受體激動劑研究進展[J];中國藥物化學(xué)雜志;2010年01期

10 徐旋里;β_2受體激動劑對膈肌的作用[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué).呼吸系統(tǒng)分冊;1999年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前10條

1 龔明;周海燕;;α_2受體激動劑的心肌保護作用[A];2008年第七次華東六省一市麻醉學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議暨浙江省麻醉學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編（上冊）[C];2008年

2 陸宇斐;馬梅方;李葆明;;幼年期注射α_2-受體激動劑或拮抗劑影響小鼠成年后的空間學(xué)習(xí)[A];中國生理學(xué)會第六屆全國青年生理學(xué)工作者學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要[C];2003年

3 朱堅;楊景賢;李波;方曉明;;氣相色譜-質(zhì)譜法測定肝、腎和肉中β_2-受體激動劑殘留量[A];2004年全國有機質(zhì)譜學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2004年

4 陶慧康;陶慧康;湯琴;;輸血相關(guān)性新生兒壞死性小腸結(jié)腸炎的Meta分析[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會第十七次全國兒科學(xué)術(shù)大會論文匯編（上冊）[C];2012年

5 于靜靜;李懷芳;;開腹與腹腔鏡全子宮切除術(shù)的Meta分析[A];第四屆長三角婦產(chǎn)科學(xué)術(shù)論壇暨浙江省2009年婦產(chǎn)科學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2009年

6 顏家朝;喻京生;;中西醫(yī)結(jié)合治療單純皰疹病毒性角膜炎的Meta分析[A];第十屆全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合眼科學(xué)術(shù)會議暨第五屆海峽眼科學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文匯編[C];2011年

7 王毓洲;黃席珍;王菁;肖高輝;羅英;武永吉;;術(shù)治療阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜合征文獻綜述及Meta分析[A];中國睡眠研究會第二屆學(xué)術(shù)年會論著匯編[C];2001年

8 郭新峰;賴世隆;;如何進行系統(tǒng)評價與Meta分析[A];第五次全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合中青年學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文匯編[C];2004年

9 曾治宇;竇相峰;王方正;;經(jīng)皮經(jīng)腔間隔心肌消融術(shù)與室間隔部分切除術(shù)治療肥厚型梗阻性心肌病的meta分析[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會心血管病分會第八次全國心血管病學(xué)術(shù)會議匯編[C];2004年

10 洪萬東;朱啟槐;黃智銘;;幽門螺桿菌糞便抗原免疫卡診斷幽門螺桿菌感染的meta分析[A];2007年浙江省消化系疾病學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前8條

1 毛杉杉;β_(2)—受體激動劑申請豁免后可以吸入方式使用[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2008年

2 明月;兩種β_2受體激動劑有助于治療哮喘[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2001年

3 見習(xí)記者 裘炯華;5—HT4受體激動劑適用亞太人群[N];醫(yī)藥經(jīng)濟報;2013年

4 ;腺苷受體激動劑欲改朝換代[N];醫(yī)藥經(jīng)濟報;2002年

5 余志平;超長效β2受體激動劑——COPD治療新選擇[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2006年

6 北京大學(xué)人民醫(yī)院呼吸內(nèi)科副主任醫(yī)師 陳燕文;β2受體激動劑如何治哮喘[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2014年

7 莊愉;研究多角度認(rèn)識更全面[N];醫(yī)藥經(jīng)濟報;2001年

8 市第一人民醫(yī)院呼吸科 陶玉堅;支氣管哮喘的治療目標(biāo)與常用的治療藥物（2）[N];揚州日報;2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 劉雪娜;TPO受體激動劑治療原發(fā)免疫性血小板減少癥的相關(guān)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

2 鄭連生;胃癌根治術(shù)聯(lián)合脾切除的Meta分析及保留脾臟脾門淋巴結(jié)清掃的臨床及解剖學(xué)觀察[D];南方醫(yī)科大學(xué);2017年

3 蔡澤忠;任脈上的交會穴治療不孕癥規(guī)律探討及Meta分析[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2017年

4 王瑜s，

本文編號：1472940