【摘要】：目的比較高分辨肛管直腸測壓與傳統(tǒng)水灌注肛管直腸測壓正常參考值的差異。方法招募22例正常志愿者先后完成高分辨肛管直腸測壓和水灌注肛管直腸測壓,比較兩種方法所得肛管靜息壓、收縮壓、肛管功能長度及直腸黏膜敏感性的差異。結(jié)果水灌注肛管直腸測壓所得到的肛管靜息壓、收縮壓及功能長度的正常參考值均低于高分辨測壓所得到的正常參考值(P0.05);水灌注肛管直腸測壓正常參考值與手動分析的高分辨肛管直腸測壓的正常參考值比較無明顯差異。結(jié)論高分辨肛管直腸測壓所測得肛管靜息壓、收縮壓及肛管功能長度均大于水灌注肛管直腸測壓所測得的正常參考值
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the difference of normal reference values between high resolution anorectal manometry and conventional water perfusion anorectal manometry. Methods 22 normal volunteers were recruited to complete high-resolution anorectal manometry and water perfusion anorectal manometry. The differences of anal resting pressure, systolic blood pressure, anal function length and rectal mucosal sensitivity between the two methods were compared. Results the normal reference values of anal resting pressure, systolic blood pressure and functional length obtained by water perfusion anorectal manometry were lower than those obtained by high resolution manometry (P0.05). There was no significant difference between the normal reference value of water perfusion anorectal manometry and the normal reference value of high resolution anorectal manometry analyzed by hand. Conclusion the anal resting pressure, systolic blood pressure and anal function length measured by high resolution anorectal manometry are larger than the normal reference values measured by water perfusion anorectal manometry.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)附屬第六醫(yī)院盆底中心;
【分類號】：R574

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡俊川,周兵,王前清;肛管直腸損傷的診斷及治療[J];中國綜合臨床;2004年09期

2 徐其佐,喻德洪;肛管直腸損傷的診治現(xiàn)狀[J];創(chuàng)傷外科雜志;2001年03期

3 徐林富;肛管直腸損傷17例診治體會[J];浙江臨床醫(yī)學(xué);2001年07期

4 孟榮貴,郝立強(qiáng);肛管直腸損傷的診斷及治療[J];腹部外科;2002年02期

5 陳德誼;盆腔放療后的肛管直腸損傷[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué).外科學(xué)分冊;2002年02期

6 劉勤遠(yuǎn);肛管直腸損傷[J];人民軍醫(yī);1994年09期

7 劉喜武,鄭培臣;肛管直腸異物診治體會[J];航空航天醫(yī)藥;1998年03期

8 黃小靖,劉永華;肛管直腸損傷16例治療體會[J];福建醫(yī)藥雜志;1999年01期

9 蔣波,師新榮,李海;肛管、直腸損傷21例診治[J];寧夏醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年02期

10 陳莉;肛管超聲對肛管直腸疾病的診斷價值[J];中國超聲醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;1994年01期

，

本文編號：2436634