本文選題：原發(fā)性膽汁性膽管炎 + Poly��； 參考：《醫(yī)學研究生學報》2017年04期

【摘要】：目的原發(fā)性膽汁性膽管炎(PBC)患者肝內(nèi)趨化因子CXCL13表達顯著增加,但其來源和機制尚不明確。文章旨在通過建立PBC小鼠模型,探索PBC小鼠肝內(nèi)趨化因子CXCL13的表達及其主要來源細胞。方法采用隨機數(shù)字表法將C57BL/6小鼠分為實驗組[n=20,腹腔注射聚肌苷酸-聚胞苷酸(Poly I:C,2次/周,共12周)]和對照組(n=10,腹腔注射,系同實驗組等體積磷酸鹽緩沖液)。酶聯(lián)免疫吸附試驗(ELISA)測定血清AMA水平,HE染色觀察肝組織炎癥細胞浸潤情況。原位灌注酶消化結(jié)合磁珠分選法分離小鼠肝內(nèi)Kupffer細胞、肝血竇內(nèi)皮細胞以及肝內(nèi)淋巴細胞,熒光定量PCR檢測肝組織以及上述細胞亞群CXCL13 mRNA表達水平。結(jié)果實驗組小鼠血清AMA水平隨建模時間延長逐漸上升,首次注射Poly I:C后第4、8、12周陽性率分別為5.9%、52.9%以及76.5%,而對照組小鼠血清AMA水平在整個建模過程中均呈現(xiàn)較低水平,僅在第12周時有2只小鼠AMA水平略高于陽性界值。實驗組和對照組小鼠肝組織HE染色結(jié)果表明,實驗組小鼠肝內(nèi)匯管區(qū)大量炎癥細胞浸潤,而對照組小鼠肝內(nèi)未見炎癥細胞浸潤。流式細胞術(shù)檢測實驗組小鼠Kupffer細胞、肝血竇內(nèi)皮細胞的分離純度分別為76%~80%、68%~72%。與Kupffer細胞CXCL13 mRNA表達[2.34(0.22-8.64)]比較,肝血竇內(nèi)皮細胞、肝內(nèi)淋巴細胞表達下降[0.27(0.03-1.64)、0.05(0-0.22),P0.05]。結(jié)論 Poly I:C誘導建立的PBC小鼠模型中肝內(nèi)升高的趨化因子CXCL13主要來源于Kupffer細胞。
[Abstract]:Objective the expression of chemokine CXCL13 was significantly increased in patients with primary biliary cholangitis, but its origin and mechanism were unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the expression of chemokine CXCL13 and its main cells in liver of PBC mice by establishing PBC mouse model. Methods C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group (n = 20) and the control group (n = 10) and the control group (n = 10, n = 10). The mice were treated with the same volume of phosphate buffer solution as the experimental group (n = 20, intraperitoneal injection) and the control group (n = 10, n = 10). The level of serum AMA was determined by Elisa and HE staining was used to observe the infiltration of inflammatory cells in liver tissue. Kupffer cells were isolated from mouse liver by in situ perfusion enzyme digestion combined with magnetic bead sorting method. Hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells and intrahepatic lymphocytes were isolated. The expression of CXCL13 mRNA in liver tissue and its subsets were detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR. Results the serum AMA level of the experimental group increased gradually with the prolongation of modeling time. The positive rates of serum AMA in the experimental group were 5.92and 76.5respectively at the 8th week after the first injection of Poly I: C, while the serum AMA level in the control group was lower than that in the control group during the whole modeling process. Only at the 12th week, the AMA level of 2 mice was slightly higher than the positive limit. The results of HE staining in the liver tissue of the experimental group and the control group showed that a large number of inflammatory cells were infiltrated in the intrahepatic catchment area of the experimental group, but no infiltration of the inflammatory cells was found in the liver of the control group. Flow cytometry was used to detect Kupffer cells in experimental group and the purity of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells was 76% and 80% respectively. Compared with the expression of CXCL13 mRNA in Kupffer cells [2.34 ~ 0.22-8.64], the expression of hepatic lymphocytes in hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells was decreased [0.27o0.03-1.640.55 (0-0.22) (P0.05)]. Conclusion the increased chemokine CXCL13 in the liver of PBC mice induced by Poly I: C is mainly derived from Kupffer cells.
【作者單位】： 器官衰竭防治國家重點實驗室 廣東省病毒性肝炎研究重點實驗室 南方醫(yī)科大學南方醫(yī)院感染內(nèi)科暨肝病中心;北京大學深圳醫(yī)院感染內(nèi)科;
【基金】：國家自然科學基金(81470836)
【分類號】：R575.7;R-332

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;Difference between periportal and pericentral Kupffer cells in uptaking lipopolysaccharides in rats[J];China National Journal of New Gastroenterology;1997年03期

2 ;The effect of lipopolysaccharides on the expression of CD14 and TLR4 in rat Kupffer cells[J];Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International;2003年02期

3 ;Hyaluronic acid fragments evoke Kupffer cells via TLR4 signaling pathway[J];Science in China(Series C:Life Sciences);2009年02期

4 ;Kupffer cells contribute to concanavalin A-induced hepatic injury through a Th1 but not Th17 type response-dependent pathway in mice[J];Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International;2011年02期

5 李建明,金麗娟,金春華,王靜珍;Changes of membrane-bound and -secreted TNF in rat Kupffer cell after thermal injury[J];Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA;1998年02期

6 王磊,于麗萍,竇科峰;大腸桿菌脂多糖誘導大鼠Kupffer細胞NF-κB激活及其意義[J];中國醫(yī)師雜志;2004年01期

7 ;Protection against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury via downregulation of toll-like receptor 2 expression by inhibition of Kupffer cell function[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2005年28期

8 ;Role of liver X receptors alpha agonist on expressions of LPS-induced inflammatory response associated factor IRAK-4 and NF-kappaB in Kupffer cells[J];Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA;2008年02期

9 姜雪強;馮紅萍;田德英;;一種簡便實用的大鼠Kupffer細胞的分離與鑒定方法[J];中西醫(yī)結(jié)合肝病雜志;2014年02期

10 賀蕾;楊江華;姚應(yīng)水;王濤;楊進孫;蘇川;;免疫磁珠法分選小鼠肝臟Kupffer細胞及其特性觀察[J];皖南醫(yī)學院學報;2009年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 韋嘉;朱強;;SD大鼠肝細胞、Kupffer分離與培養(yǎng)/共同培養(yǎng)[A];第一次全國中西醫(yī)結(jié)合傳染病學術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2006年

2 朱強;韋嘉;黃富禮;張慶軍;;大鼠肝細胞、Kupffer細胞共同培養(yǎng)的實驗研究[A];2006年浙江省感染病、肝病學術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2006年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 魯沛;造血干細胞對小鼠Kupffer細胞池的維持作用[D];首都醫(yī)科大學;2015年

2 張明剛;凋亡細胞誘導免疫負相調(diào)控及其相關(guān)機制的研究[D];浙江大學;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 苗春木;LXRα通過下調(diào)IRF3-GRIP1抑制LPS誘導的Kupffer細胞活化[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學;2008年

2 張艷;Kupffer細胞中GITRL通過抑制PDL-1調(diào)控炎癥反應(yīng)的研究[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學;2012年

3 歐志兵;LXRα通過IRF3途徑負性調(diào)控LPS誘導的Kupffer細胞激活的機制研究[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1848044