新生血管性青光眼抗VEGF聯(lián)合手術(shù)治療的Meta分析
本文選題:抗VEGF + 新生血管性青光眼; 參考:《廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:目的:評估抗VEGF藥物玻璃體腔注射輔助青光眼Ahmed減壓閥植入術(shù)對新生血管性青光眼治療效果的影響方法:檢索國內(nèi)外數(shù)據(jù)庫,囊括以下數(shù)據(jù)庫:Pubmed、The Cochrane Library、EMBASE、維普中文科技期刊數(shù)據(jù)庫、中國知網(wǎng)、萬方數(shù)據(jù)庫,選取2017年1月1日前的文獻,主題是關(guān)于新生血管性青光眼Ahmed減壓閥植入術(shù)前或術(shù)中是否給予抗VEGF藥物玻璃體腔注射的對照研究。納入7篇文章,通過提取數(shù)據(jù),應(yīng)用Comprehensive Meta Analysis2.0軟件,眼壓下降幅度(基礎(chǔ)眼壓與觀察終點的眼壓之差)IOPR作為主要的評估指標(biāo),手術(shù)成功率的比值比(OR)及95%可信區(qū)間(confidence interval,CI)作為次要評估指標(biāo),并分析術(shù)后并發(fā)癥。結(jié)果:本系統(tǒng)評價納入七項研究,299例患者308只眼。Meta分析結(jié)果顯示,抗VEGF藥物玻璃體腔注射輔助青光眼Ahmed減壓閥植入術(shù)與單純Ahmed青光眼減壓閥植入手術(shù)相比,降眼壓作用稍強,術(shù)后1年眼壓平均低4.182±1.765mm Hg(P0.05)。抗VEGF玻璃體腔注射輔助Ahmed青光眼減壓閥植入術(shù)與Ahmed青光眼減壓閥植入術(shù)相比,兩組術(shù)后1年手術(shù)成功率的差異沒有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義。前者可以減少術(shù)后前房積血的發(fā)生。結(jié)論:抗VEGF藥物玻璃體腔注射輔助Ahmed青光眼減壓閥植入術(shù)與單純Ahmed青光眼減壓閥植入術(shù)相比,在降低眼壓方面更為有效。兩者在手術(shù)成功率方面的差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義?筕EGF藥物的使用能減少術(shù)后前房積血的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:Objective: to evaluate the effect of Ahmed pressure relief valve implantation on neovascular glaucoma with anti- VEGF drug intravitreal injection. Methods: to search the domestic and foreign databases, including the following databases: the Cochrane Library EMBASE, the Chinese Journal of Science and Technology database. China Zhiwang, Wanfang database, selected literature before January 1, 2017, the subject is whether to give intravitreal injection of anti- drugs before or during Ahmed pressure relief valve implantation in neovascular glaucoma. Seven articles were included, and the Comprehensive Meta Analysis2.0 software was used to extract the data. The decrease of IOP (the difference between the basic IOP and the IOP at the observation end point) was used as the main evaluation index. The ratio of success rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as secondary evaluation indexes and postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: in this systematic evaluation, 308 eyes of 299 patients were included in this study. The results of Meta analysis showed that the intraocular pressure relief effect was slightly stronger than that of simple Ahmed glaucoma relief valve implantation, compared with that of Ahmed pressure relief valve implantation assisted by anti- VEGF drug intravitreal injection. The mean IOP was 4.182 鹵1.765mm HgG P 0.05 after 1 year postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative success rate between the two groups in terms of anti- intravitreal injection assisted Ahmed glaucoma pressure relief valve implantation and Ahmed glaucoma pressure relief valve implantation. The former can reduce the incidence of postoperative hyphema. Conclusion: the anti- VEGF drug intravitreal injection assisted Ahmed glaucoma pressure relief valve implantation is more effective in reducing intraocular pressure than that of Ahmed glaucoma pressure relief valve implantation alone. There was no significant difference in surgical success rate between the two groups. The use of anti-VEGF drugs can reduce the incidence of postoperative hyphema.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:R779.6
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 劉海燕;謝顯功;;表現(xiàn)為新生血管性青光眼的原發(fā)視神經(jīng)鞘腦膜瘤[J];世界最新醫(yī)學(xué)信息文摘;2015年34期
2 劉勇;平功勛;;貝伐單抗與雷珠單抗聯(lián)合Ahmed閥植入治療NVG的對照研究[J];國際眼科雜志;2015年12期
3 Hai-Tao Zhang;Yu-Xin Yang;Ying-Ying Xu;Rui-Min Yang;Bao-Jun Wang;Jun-Xi Hu;;Intravitreal bevacizumab and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in patients with neovascular glaucoma[J];International Journal of Ophthalmology;2014年05期
4 張立貴;;國內(nèi)新生血管性青光眼治療現(xiàn)狀及方法探討[J];國際眼科雜志;2010年10期
5 王丹;翟俊霞;牟振云;宗紅俠;趙曉東;王學(xué)義;顧平;;Meta分析中的異質(zhì)性及其處理方法[J];中國循證醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2009年10期
6 余曉波;孫興懷;郭文毅;錢韶紅;;新生血管性青光眼原發(fā)疾病的臨床研究[J];中國眼耳鼻喉科雜志;2004年05期
7 彭曉燕,陳大年;血管內(nèi)皮生長因子和眼內(nèi)新生血管[J];中華眼底病雜志;1999年01期
8 孫興懷;難治性青光眼的治療[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué).眼科學(xué)分冊;1995年01期
9 王爾茜;陳有信;;新一代抗血管內(nèi)皮生長因子藥物阿柏西普基礎(chǔ)及臨床研究現(xiàn)狀[J];中華眼底病雜志;2013年02期
,本文編號:1787300
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/wuguanyixuelunwen/1787300.html