小瞳孔白內(nèi)障手術(shù)中虹膜拉鉤與放射狀瞳孔緣虹膜切開擴(kuò)瞳的并發(fā)癥及視力預(yù)后對(duì)比
本文選題:白內(nèi)障/外科學(xué) + 小瞳孔。 參考:《眼科》2017年02期
【摘要】:目的觀察并對(duì)比小瞳孔白內(nèi)障手術(shù)中虹膜拉鉤與放射狀瞳孔緣虹膜切開擴(kuò)瞳的并發(fā)癥及視力預(yù)后。設(shè)計(jì)回顧性比較性病例系列。研究對(duì)象2012年4月至2015年6月在廣州市中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)院接受超聲乳化白內(nèi)障吸出聯(lián)合人工晶狀體植入術(shù)的83例(90眼)小瞳孔白內(nèi)障患者。方法 50眼行虹膜拉鉤擴(kuò)瞳(研究組),40眼行放射狀瞳孔緣虹膜切開擴(kuò)瞳(對(duì)照組),記錄兩組的圍手術(shù)期指標(biāo)、術(shù)后并發(fā)癥及視力恢復(fù)情況。主要指標(biāo)超聲乳化時(shí)間、手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中術(shù)后并發(fā)癥及術(shù)后視力。結(jié)果對(duì)照組平均超聲乳化時(shí)間顯著高于研究組(104.8±17.9 s和57.8±11.9 s)(t=12.835,P0.001);對(duì)照組平均手術(shù)總時(shí)間明顯低于研究組(20.1±3.8 min和29.2±5.8 min)(t=-6.468,P0.001);對(duì)照組術(shù)中虹膜損傷及出血顯著高于研究組(P0.001);對(duì)照組術(shù)后1天矯正視力≥0.3者(40%),低于研究組(72%)(χ~2=9.328,P=0.002),對(duì)照組術(shù)后3個(gè)月矯正視力≥0.3者(80%),低于研究組(90%)(χ~2=1.798,P=0.180);研究組術(shù)后1天瞳孔變形率顯著低于對(duì)照組(68%和95%)(χ~2=10.125,P=0.001);研究組術(shù)后1周瞳孔變形率顯著低于對(duì)照組(20%和90%)(χ~2=46.557,P0.001)。研究組和對(duì)照組的角膜水腫率分別為86%和90%(χ~2=0.331,P=0.565),但兩組的角膜水腫程度比較,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(Z=11.318,P=0.003);研究組前房反應(yīng)率68%,顯著低于對(duì)照組的95%(χ~2=10.125,P=0.001)。結(jié)論小瞳孔白內(nèi)障手術(shù)中虹膜拉鉤擴(kuò)瞳,具有安全系數(shù)高、不易出血和引起炎癥的優(yōu)點(diǎn),對(duì)術(shù)后瞳孔恢復(fù)形態(tài)和功能有積極意義。
[Abstract]:Objective to observe and compare the complications and visual prognosis of iris retractor and radial pupil edge iridotomy in small pupillary cataract surgery.A retrospective comparative case series was designed.Participants from April 2012 to June 2015, 83 patients (90 eyes) with small pupillary cataract underwent phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation in Guangzhou Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital.Methods 50 eyes were treated with iris retractor dilatation (40 eyes of study group) underwent iris dilatation (control group). The perioperative indexes, postoperative complications and visual acuity were recorded in both groups.Main outcome measures phacoemulsification time, operative time, postoperative complications and postoperative visual acuity.Results the average phacoemulsification time in the control group was significantly higher than that in the study group (104.8 鹵17.9 s and 57.8 鹵11.9 s), and the mean total operation time in the control group was significantly lower than that in the study group (20.1 鹵3.8 min and 29.2 鹵5.8 mint-6.468 min, P 0.001). The iris injury and bleeding in the control group were significantly higher than that in the study group (P 0.001).The pore deformation rate was significantly lower than that in the control group (20% and 90% respectively).The corneal edema rates of the study group and the control group were 86% and 90% respectively (蠂 ~ (2) 0.331P ~ (0.565)), but there was a significant difference in the degree of corneal edema between the two groups. The response rate of the anterior chamber in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (蠂 ~ (2 10.125) P ~ (0.001)) and the response rate of the anterior chamber in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (蠂 ~ (210.125) P ~ (0.001) P ~ (0.001)).Conclusion the dilated pupil of iris retractor in small pupil cataract surgery has the advantages of high safety factor, not easy bleeding and inflammation, which has positive significance for the recovery of pupil shape and function.
【作者單位】: 廣州市中西醫(yī)結(jié)合醫(yī)院眼科;
【分類號(hào)】:R779.66
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條
1 喬建平;小瞳孔下切口白內(nèi)障人工晶狀體手術(shù)12例[J];中原醫(yī)刊;2004年10期
2 黎海平,彭崇信;黏連性小瞳孔下白內(nèi)障囊外摘除術(shù)及人工晶狀體植入術(shù)42例[J];廣西醫(yī)學(xué);2004年09期
3 楊志強(qiáng),劉軍;白內(nèi)障摘出人工晶狀體植入術(shù)中小瞳孔的處理[J];眼外傷職業(yè)眼病雜志.附眼科手術(shù);2005年10期
4 趙曉輝;陳櫻;邢怡橋;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化術(shù)的臨床療效分析[J];中國眼耳鼻喉科雜志;2005年06期
5 吳新成;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化術(shù)的療效觀察[J];醫(yī)藥論壇雜志;2006年11期
6 閻立宏;;虹睫炎后小瞳孔白內(nèi)障人工晶體植入術(shù)的探討[J];哈爾濱醫(yī)藥;2006年06期
7 黃經(jīng)河;鐘燕梅;馮鈺;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障摘出人工晶狀體植入術(shù)[J];眼外傷職業(yè)眼病雜志.附眼科手術(shù);2006年12期
8 林力平;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化術(shù)的分析[J];中國眼耳鼻喉科雜志;2008年06期
9 侯習(xí)武;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障人工晶狀體手術(shù)方式的選擇[J];醫(yī)藥論壇雜志;2008年10期
10 曹亞云;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化術(shù)聯(lián)合人工晶狀體植入術(shù)[J];中國眼耳鼻喉科雜志;2009年04期
中國重要會(huì)議論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前9條
1 苗保慶;劉仕廷;陳方;;粘連性小瞳孔的白內(nèi)障摘除人工晶狀體植入術(shù)[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十二屆全國眼科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2007年
2 董澤紅;惠玲;張自峰;王雨生;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化術(shù)的臨床觀察[A];第十四屆西北五省眼科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文集[C];2013年
3 吳善君;周宏健;徐曉萍;;彈性虹膜拉鉤在小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[A];2005年浙江省眼科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2005年
4 董萬江;肖志全;劉華;余素英;胡紹柱;;小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化臨床分析[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十二屆全國眼科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2007年
5 許和;王麗華;李曉慧;候麗萍;;基層開展小瞳孔非乳化白內(nèi)障摘除及人工晶體植入臨床體會(huì)[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十二屆全國眼科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2007年
6 顏文韜;吳文燦;方海珍;王勤美;李樂平;葉恬恬;陳浩;;Panoramic 200小瞳孔下眼底激光掃描對(duì)眼底病變?cè)\斷的準(zhǔn)確性的探討[A];2006年浙江省眼科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2006年
7 李文生;吳榮瀚;徐明;孫剛;;軟瞳孔擴(kuò)張技術(shù)在小瞳孔白內(nèi)障超聲乳化手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十二屆全國眼科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2007年
8 龐麟;馬雅玲;;小瞳孔下白內(nèi)障超聲乳化摘除聯(lián)合折疊式后房型人工晶體植入術(shù)[A];第十四屆西北五省眼科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文集[C];2013年
9 朱美玲;廖榮豐;陶黎明;;小瞳孔虹膜后粘連的超聲乳化白內(nèi)障摘除人工晶植入體術(shù)[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)第十二屆全國眼科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文匯編[C];2007年
,本文編號(hào):1743228
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/wuguanyixuelunwen/1743228.html