經(jīng)傷椎單節(jié)段與跨傷椎短節(jié)段固定治療Denis B型胸腰椎爆裂骨折的生物力學實驗研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-18 06:21
【摘要】：目的：胸腰椎爆裂骨折在臨床工作中較為常見。臨床上多采取手術治療，但對于術式的選擇爭議較大。本研究通過進行體外胸腰椎爆裂骨折動物模型生物力學實驗，測量經(jīng)傷椎單節(jié)段固定（簡稱單節(jié)段固定）組與短節(jié)段固定組（簡稱短節(jié)段固定）在自動控制電子萬能試驗機上模擬前屈、后伸垂直應力下手術及鄰近節(jié)段載荷-應變變化，對比兩種固定方式的生物力學特性。用生物電測方法評價兩種固定方式對胸腰椎生物力學特性的影響，為臨床應用提供理論依據(jù)和實驗指導。 材料與方法：8具小牛的新鮮T11-L3脊柱標本，排除骨病與畸形。將標本包埋、固定后在自動控制電子萬能試驗機上，分別以0.1in/min的載荷增加速度對標本施加150N的前屈、后伸載荷，通過電阻應變儀測出相關測點的應變值。隨后將標本采用預損傷后壓縮或撞擊的方法制作L1椎體爆裂骨折模型，破壞上終板，保留下終板完整。將8具標本隨機分為經(jīng)傷椎單節(jié)段固定組，跨傷椎短節(jié)段固定組。并采用同樣方法測量各測點應變值。分析手術節(jié)段及鄰近節(jié)段的載荷-應變變化。數(shù)據(jù)的分析使用的是SPSS16.0軟件包（SPSS，Chicago，IL，，USA），各組間數(shù)據(jù)的比較采用單因素方差分析法和scheffe法，配對t檢驗，P0.05為差異有顯著意義。 結果：1.兩種固定方式均可以獲得滿意的固定強度，足夠維持椎體的穩(wěn)定性。 2.與短節(jié)段固定相比單節(jié)段固定同等撐開高度的釘棒承受的應力更小，能更好的恢復椎體的高度，且釘棒疲勞斷裂的發(fā)生率更低。 3.單節(jié)段組與短節(jié)段組均存在一定的應力遮擋，但本次未能比較出哪種固定方式應力遮擋效應更明顯。 結論：經(jīng)傷椎單節(jié)段固定與跨傷椎短節(jié)段固定均能獲得滿意的固定強度，足夠維持椎體的穩(wěn)定性。針對特定的Denis B型爆裂骨折，單節(jié)段固定是一種良好的選擇。
[Abstract]:Objective: thoracolumbar burst fracture is more common in clinical work. Surgical treatment is more common in clinical practice, but the choice of surgical procedure is controversial. In this study, the biomechanical experiment of the animal model of thoracolumbar burst fracture in vitro was carried out. The changes of the load-strain of the adjacent segments of the injured vertebrae under vertical stress were measured by simulating flexion and postextension in the single segment fixation (single segment fixation) group and the short segment fixation group (short segment fixation) in the automatic control electronic universal tester, and the changes of the load-strain of the adjacent segments were measured under the vertical stress of the injured vertebrae. The biomechanical properties of the two fixation methods were compared. The effects of two fixation methods on biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar spine were evaluated by bioelectric measurement, which provided theoretical basis and experimental guidance for clinical application. Materials and methods: 8 fresh T11-L3 spine specimens of calf were used to exclude bone disease and deformity. The specimens were embedded and fixed on the automatic control electronic universal testing machine. The specimens were subjected to 150 N forward flexion and extension loads at the increasing speed of 0.1in/min load respectively. The strain values of the relevant measurement points were measured by the resistance strain gauge. The fracture model of L1 vertebral body was made by compression or impact after pre-injury. The upper endplate was destroyed and the lower endplate was intact. Eight specimens were randomly divided into single segment fixation group and transtraumatic short segment fixation group. The strain values of each measuring point are measured by the same method. The load-strain variation of the operative segment and adjacent segment was analyzed. SPSS16.0 software package (SPSS,Chicago,IL,USA) was used to analyze the data. One-way ANOVA method and scheffe method were used to compare the data among each group. Pairing t-test showed that there was significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Results: 1. Both fixation methods can obtain satisfactory fixation strength, enough to maintain the stability of the vertebral body. 2. Compared with the short segment fixation, the stress of the screw rod with the same opening height as that of the single segment fixation is lower, the height of the vertebral body can be recovered better, and the incidence of fatigue fracture of the screw rod is lower than that of the short segment fixation. 3. The single segment group and the short segment group both have certain stress shielding, but this time it is unable to compare which fixed mode stress shielding effect is more obvious. Conclusion: both single segment fixation and short segment fixation of injured vertebrae can obtain satisfactory fixation intensity and maintain the stability of vertebral body. Single segment fixation is a good choice for specific Denis B type burst fractures.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R687.3
本文編號：2459827
[Abstract]:Objective: thoracolumbar burst fracture is more common in clinical work. Surgical treatment is more common in clinical practice, but the choice of surgical procedure is controversial. In this study, the biomechanical experiment of the animal model of thoracolumbar burst fracture in vitro was carried out. The changes of the load-strain of the adjacent segments of the injured vertebrae under vertical stress were measured by simulating flexion and postextension in the single segment fixation (single segment fixation) group and the short segment fixation group (short segment fixation) in the automatic control electronic universal tester, and the changes of the load-strain of the adjacent segments were measured under the vertical stress of the injured vertebrae. The biomechanical properties of the two fixation methods were compared. The effects of two fixation methods on biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar spine were evaluated by bioelectric measurement, which provided theoretical basis and experimental guidance for clinical application. Materials and methods: 8 fresh T11-L3 spine specimens of calf were used to exclude bone disease and deformity. The specimens were embedded and fixed on the automatic control electronic universal testing machine. The specimens were subjected to 150 N forward flexion and extension loads at the increasing speed of 0.1in/min load respectively. The strain values of the relevant measurement points were measured by the resistance strain gauge. The fracture model of L1 vertebral body was made by compression or impact after pre-injury. The upper endplate was destroyed and the lower endplate was intact. Eight specimens were randomly divided into single segment fixation group and transtraumatic short segment fixation group. The strain values of each measuring point are measured by the same method. The load-strain variation of the operative segment and adjacent segment was analyzed. SPSS16.0 software package (SPSS,Chicago,IL,USA) was used to analyze the data. One-way ANOVA method and scheffe method were used to compare the data among each group. Pairing t-test showed that there was significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Results: 1. Both fixation methods can obtain satisfactory fixation strength, enough to maintain the stability of the vertebral body. 2. Compared with the short segment fixation, the stress of the screw rod with the same opening height as that of the single segment fixation is lower, the height of the vertebral body can be recovered better, and the incidence of fatigue fracture of the screw rod is lower than that of the short segment fixation. 3. The single segment group and the short segment group both have certain stress shielding, but this time it is unable to compare which fixed mode stress shielding effect is more obvious. Conclusion: both single segment fixation and short segment fixation of injured vertebrae can obtain satisfactory fixation intensity and maintain the stability of vertebral body. Single segment fixation is a good choice for specific Denis B type burst fractures.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：R687.3
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張居適;孟延豐;佟杰;康維杰;周學文;;單節(jié)段椎弓根螺釘固定治療胸腰椎骨折[J];中國骨與關節(jié)損傷雜志;2009年06期
2 楊斌輝;歐陽振;夏春林;郭征;;胸腰椎爆裂骨折損傷機制及手術治療[J];國際骨科學雜志;2012年02期
3 樓肅亮;錢金黔;趙志芳;汪冉;;胸腰椎骨折經(jīng)后路單節(jié)段椎弓根釘復位固定的臨床療效[J];創(chuàng)傷外科雜志;2014年06期
4 吳志峰;王丹丹;劉光耀;馬洪順;;頸椎小關節(jié)切除前后的蠕變特性[J];中國組織工程研究;2012年04期
5 吳志峰;李艷玲;劉光耀;馬洪順;;三種固定器械固定脛骨骨折的應力松弛實驗[J];中國組織工程研究;2012年09期
6 阮狄克;;胸腰段脊柱骨折內(nèi)固定使用長節(jié)段還是短節(jié)段[J];中國骨傷;2009年07期
7 陳應超;李健;;胸腰椎爆裂骨折的治療和展望[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2010年02期
8 黃海;李健;;后路單節(jié)段固定融合治療胸腰椎爆裂骨折的研究進展[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2012年04期
9 魏富鑫;劉少喻;趙衛(wèi)東;于濱生;李浩淼;陳柏齡;;單節(jié)段與雙節(jié)段椎弓根螺釘固定胸腰椎單椎體骨折的生物力學比較[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2007年01期
10 武啟軍;王自立;戈朝暉;馬小民;劉斌;;脊柱單節(jié)段前中柱切除后不同節(jié)段椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定的穩(wěn)定性測試[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2010年04期
本文編號：2459827
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2459827.html
最近更新
教材專著
