單鉗道內(nèi)鏡跨越式荷包縫合法封閉醫(yī)源性消化道黏膜缺損42例分析
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the clinical value of single clamp endoscopy in the treatment of iatrogenic gastrointestinal mucosal defect. Methods from April 2015 to August 2016, the data of patients with large wounds caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection (endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD) in digestive endoscopy center of our department were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 42 cases were treated with single-clamp endoscope suture (study group), and 21 cases were left out (control group). The complications and wound healing were compared between the two groups. To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of single-clamp endoscopic leapfrog purse suture. Results there was no significant difference in wound diameter (1.4 鹵0.8) cm, control group (1.2 鹵1.0) cm, in the study group after ESD (P0.05). The patients in the study group were treated with an average of 4 ~ 6 metal clips and 1 ~ 2 nylon ropes. The wound suture was satisfactory, and the success rate was 100. 5 cases (5 / 42, 11.9%) had transient fever after operation. Abdominal pain and distension were found in 4 cases (4 / 42%). In the control group, 4 cases (4 / 21 鹵19.0%) developed fever, 6 cases (6 / 21%, 28.6%) developed abdominal pain and abdominal distension, 2 cases (2 / 21 鹵9.5%) postoperative wound bleeding, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05). The hospitalization time of the study group was (4.52 鹵1.27) days, the control group was (6.94 鹵1.53) days, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The wound healed well after 1 month in the study group, and the scar formation was observed in the study group. Six patients with metal clip and nylon rope did not fall off. After 2 months, the wound was smooth and healed well. Only one patient with metal clip and nylon rope did not fall off. The patients in the control group were followed up for 1 month, 3 patients developed giant ulcer, and 2 months later, the ulcer surface of 1 patient was not healed well. Conclusion this method is safe and effective and can be widely used in clinic because of its low complication rate, short hospital stay and good wound healing.
【作者單位】: 重慶市涪陵中心醫(yī)院消化科;
【分類號】:R656
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 胡建敏;王海明;;闌尾切除殘端荷包縫合與單純結扎的療效比較[J];臨床醫(yī)學;1986年02期
2 鄧秋香;;吻合器痔上黏膜環(huán)切術荷包縫合深度對療效的影響[J];南華大學學報(醫(yī)學版);2010年04期
3 喻德洪,聞兆章,陳慶蘭;闌尾荷包縫合鉗[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學學報;1984年04期
4 程世平,賈全安,任光學,高志強,蔡宏俊,周德清,王樂群;可拆除雙活結無張力荷包縫合法在恥骨上前列腺切除術中的應用[J];臨床泌尿外科雜志;2000年06期
5 李維燦;改良活扣荷包縫合止血法在恥骨上前列腺摘除術中的應用[J];臨床泌尿外科雜志;1998年06期
6 王洪貴,郝支軍,刁元浩,張新明,張志明,閻文祥,王金銀,王毓珠,強生舜,宋廣太,肖湘,鄭南松,趙世才,張鐵山,蔡長友;各種結扎法和/或荷包縫合法[J];實用外科雜志;1988年05期
7 李云新;;荷包縫合不同高度對吻合器痔上黏膜環(huán)切術治療內(nèi)痔療效及并發(fā)癥的影響[J];中國醫(yī)療前沿;2011年08期
8 涂蒼慨,涂登炎;嬰幼兒腹股溝斜疝修補術的改進[J];安徽中醫(yī)學院學報;1996年04期
9 孫志剛,韓巖,郭樹忠,魯開化;四點荷包縫合圓形皮膚病灶的實驗研究[J];華北國防醫(yī)藥;2002年06期
10 陳規(guī)劃;改良荷包縫合法在胰空腸套入吻合中的應用(英)[J];國外醫(yī)學.外科學分冊;1994年06期
相關會議論文 前5條
1 安少雄;苗春紅;;單荷包縫合預防吻合器痔上黏膜環(huán)切術中出血的臨床研究[A];北京結直腸肛門病學術交流會暨盧克捷學術思想研討會論文集[C];2012年
2 楊亞益;;荷包縫合皮膚圓形病灶在臨床中的運用[A];2006年浙江省整形外科與醫(yī)學美容學術會議論文匯編[C];2006年
3 高乃榮;石欣;;胰腸插入荷包縫合預防胰瘺的臨床觀察[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十一屆全國胰腺外科學術研討會論文匯編[C];2006年
4 馬盈盈;袁學剛;楊向東;張平副;易貴華;;單荷包縫合在PPH術中的臨床應用體會[A];中華中醫(yī)藥學會第十二次大腸肛門病學術會議論文匯編[C];2006年
5 王志民;;波浪式荷包縫合法在PPH治療混合痔中應用[A];中醫(yī)肛腸理論與實踐——中華中醫(yī)藥學會肛腸分會成立三十周年紀念大會暨二零一零年中醫(yī)肛腸學術交流大會論文匯編[C];2010年
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 記者 張曄 通訊員 范潔 劉超;我專家獨創(chuàng)“荷包縫合技術”替代傳統(tǒng)針線縫合法[N];科技日報;2014年
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 王鵬飛;荷包縫合方法在乳腺癌改良根治術切口縫合中的應用[D];廣西醫(yī)科大學;2016年
2 袁保;降低荷包縫合高度施行PPH術的臨床研究[D];南京中醫(yī)藥大學;2012年
3 岳朝馳;兩種不同荷包縫合高度的PPH術治療混合痔的臨床對照研究[D];成都中醫(yī)藥大學;2009年
,本文編號:2395242
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/2395242.html