【摘要】：目的:用Meta分析的方法對單雙側(cè)經(jīng)皮椎體成形術(shù)(Percutaneous Vertebroplasty,PVP)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折(Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures,OVCF)的臨床療效進行對比分析。方法:數(shù)據(jù)庫檢索1987年1月至2016年12月,包括PubMed,Springer,EMBASE,OVID,Web of science,Cochrane central register of controlled trial,CNKI,萬方數(shù)據(jù)庫。手工檢索《Spine》,《Euro Spine》,《中華骨科雜志》,《中國脊柱脊髓》等雜志。按納入和排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn)收集文獻(xiàn),進行異質(zhì)性評價和偏倚評價,用Review Manager 5.3進行數(shù)據(jù)分析。結(jié)果:亞組分析和匯總顯示VAS評分在術(shù)后3月時,雙側(cè)椎弓根組評分低于單側(cè)組(Z=2.47,P=0.01)。在其他亞組沒有明顯統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異。匯總后分析顯示雙側(cè)組評分低于單側(cè)組(Z=2.93,P=0.003)。骨質(zhì)疏松癥患者生活評分(QUALEFFO)在術(shù)后3月,6月,12月均有顯著差異,雙側(cè)椎弓根組評分低于單側(cè)組(Z=5.81,P0.00001)。單雙側(cè)組術(shù)后Oswestry功能障礙指數(shù)評分沒有明顯統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(Z=0.45,P=0.65)。雙側(cè)組在手術(shù)時間及骨水泥注入量上明顯超過單側(cè)組(P0.00001),兩組間的骨水泥滲漏率間的比較卻沒有統(tǒng)計學(xué)的差異(P=0.65)。結(jié)論:單側(cè)組能縮短手術(shù)時間,減少骨水泥注入量,在術(shù)后即刻疼痛緩解上和功能活動上能獲得滿意效果,但隨著隨訪時間的延長,雙側(cè)椎弓根組在疼痛緩解和生活質(zhì)量上優(yōu)于單側(cè)組。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the clinical efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (Percutaneous Vertebroplasty) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture) by Meta. Methods: the database was searched from January 1987 to December 2016. Manual search < Spine >, < Euro Spine >, Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, Chinese Spine and Spinal Cord, et al. Literature was collected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, heterogeneity and bias were evaluated, and data were analyzed with Review Manager 5.3. Results: the subgroup analysis and summary showed that the score of VAS in bilateral pedicle group was lower than that in unilateral group at 3 months after operation. There was no significant difference in other subgroups. The score of bilateral group was lower than that of unilateral group (ZT2.93 P0. 003). The (QUALEFFO) scores of osteoporosis patients were significantly different in 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, and the scores in bilateral pedicle group were lower than those in unilateral group (P 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the score of Oswestry dysfunction index between the unilateral and bilateral groups (P < 0. 65). The time of operation and the amount of bone cement injection in bilateral group were significantly higher than that in unilateral group (P0.00001), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the rate of bone cement leakage (P0. 65). Conclusion: unilateral group can shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bone cement injection, and obtain satisfactory results in immediate pain relief and functional activity after operation, but with the extension of follow-up time. Bilateral pedicle group was superior to unilateral group in pain relief and quality of life.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R687.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王璽;寇劍銘;賈學(xué)軍;侯建文;田偉;高沖;仇志燁;;單、雙側(cè)椎體成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的臨床療效比較[J];中國老年學(xué)雜志;2016年16期

2 張智海;張智若;劉忠厚;袁偉;;中國大陸地區(qū)以-2.0SD為診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的骨質(zhì)疏松癥發(fā)病率回顧性研究[J];中國骨質(zhì)疏松雜志;2016年01期

3 周榮;范華僑;周秩華;蔣剛;;單側(cè)與雙側(cè)入路經(jīng)皮穿刺椎體成形術(shù)治療胸腰椎骨質(zhì)疏松性壓縮性骨折[J];臨床骨科雜志;2015年06期

4 肖良;徐宏光;劉平;王凌挺;楊曉明;陳學(xué)武;張s，

本文編號：2146351