本文選題：肌電生物反饋 + 表面肌電圖��； 參考：《大連醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：運(yùn)用表面肌電圖定量分析經(jīng)肌電生物反饋儀治療后患側(cè)股直肌、股內(nèi)側(cè)肌、股外側(cè)肌的肌力,探討肌電生物反饋儀對(duì)膝關(guān)節(jié)肌力恢復(fù)的療效。方法：膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬患者28例,男性19例,女性9例；平均年齡35.53±9.20(18～55歲),身高173.89±8.72(159～183cm),體重71.64±10.07(52～83kg),病程12.82±8.03(3～24周)。隨機(jī)分成治療組和對(duì)照組,每組14例,治療組和對(duì)照組兩組患者的年齡、身高、體重及病程運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件進(jìn)行比較,均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P0.05),所以兩組患者在治療前一般情況處于同一基線,具有可比性。兩組患者均給予常規(guī)康復(fù)治療,包括蠟療、運(yùn)動(dòng)療法、冷療；對(duì)照組采用常規(guī)康復(fù)治療；治療組采用常規(guī)康復(fù)治療輔以肌電生物反饋(廣州晶冠科技,型號(hào)565)治療。分別于治療前及治療后4周利用表面肌電圖(海神型號(hào)NDI-092)采集股外肌(VL)股直肌(RF)和股內(nèi)肌(VM)的相對(duì)均方根振幅(RMS)進(jìn)行比較,判斷治療前后患者這三組肌肉肌力的變化,所有數(shù)據(jù)均進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理。結(jié)果：1、對(duì)照組：治療前股直肌(RF)、股內(nèi)肌(VM)和股外肌(VL)的相對(duì)增長(zhǎng)的均方根振幅(RMS)均數(shù)為9.641±10.744,13.380±14.308,13.353±14.374,治療后股直肌(RF)和股內(nèi)肌(VM)股外肌(VL)的相對(duì)增長(zhǎng)的均方根振幅(RMS)均數(shù)為17.304±7.275,16.738±8.719,37.273±30.945,兩組數(shù)據(jù)行t檢驗(yàn),VL組數(shù)據(jù)均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)；其余兩組無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05).治療組：治療前股直肌(RF)、股內(nèi)肌(VM)和股外肌(VL)的均方根振幅(RMS)均數(shù)為13.642±3.193,12.183±9.178,13.486±9.017,治療后股直肌(RF)、股內(nèi)肌(VM)和股外肌(VL)的均方根振幅(RMS)均數(shù)為32.905±22.213,34.373±25.682,74.499±61.112,三組數(shù)據(jù)行t檢驗(yàn),均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)；治療組評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的改善程度明顯優(yōu)于對(duì)照組結(jié)論：常規(guī)康復(fù)治療可以改善患膝的肌力,但配合肌電生物反饋療法療效更顯著。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the effect of surface electromyography (EMG) biofeedback instrument on the recovery of muscle strength of knee joint by quantitative analysis of muscle strength of the affected side of rectus femoris, medial femoral muscle and lateral femoral muscle after treatment with electromyoelectric biofeedback instrument (EMG). Methods: there were 28 cases of knee joint stiffness, male 19 and female 9, mean age 35.53 鹵9.20 (1855 years), height 173.89 鹵8.72 (159~183cm), body weight 71.64 鹵10.07 (52~83kg), course of disease 12.82 鹵8.03 (3weeks). They were randomly divided into treatment group and control group with 14 cases in each group. The age, height, weight and course of disease of the patients in the treatment group and the control group were compared by statistical software. There is no statistical difference (P0.05), so the two groups of patients in the general situation before treatment at the same baseline, comparable. Two groups of patients were given routine rehabilitation therapy, including wax therapy, exercise therapy, cold therapy; the control group was treated with routine rehabilitation; the treatment group was treated with routine rehabilitation combined with myoelectric biofeedback (Guangzhou Jingguan Technology, Model 565). Surface electromyography (NDI-092) was used to collect the relative root-mean-square amplitude (RMS) of the lateral femoral muscle (VL) and the intrafemoral muscle (VM) before and 4 weeks after treatment. All the data were processed statistically. Results: the mean RMS of relative increase of RMS of rectus femoris (RF), medial femoral muscle (VM) and external femoral muscle (VL) before treatment was 9.641 鹵10.744 鹵13.380 鹵14.308 鹵13.353 鹵14.374. The mean value of relative increase of root mean square amplitude (RMS) of rectus femoris (RF) and medial femoral muscle (VM) was 13.353 鹵14.374 before treatment. The data were 17.304 鹵7.275 and 16.738 鹵8.719 鹵37.273 鹵30.945 respectively. The data of VL group were statistically significant (P0.05). The other two groups had no statistical significance (P0.05). The mean root mean amplitude (RMS) of rectus femoris (RF), medial femoral muscle (VM) and lateral femoral muscle (VL) was 13.642 鹵3.19312.183 鹵9.1781.486 鹵9.017 before treatment. After treatment, the mean RMS of rectus femoris (RF), medial femoral muscle (VM) and extrafemoral muscle (VL) were 32.905 鹵22.2133t 34.373 鹵25.682n 74.499 鹵61.112, respectively (P0.05). Conclusion: routine rehabilitation therapy can improve the muscle strength of the affected knee, but the effect of EMG biofeedback therapy is more obvious than that of the control group.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：R684

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 劉文;王盛龍;;肌電生物反饋儀監(jiān)測(cè)脫敏治療航行恐怖癥1例[J];實(shí)用醫(yī)藥雜志;2007年04期

2 韓純慶,李志華,趙惠莉;肌電生物反饋儀治療老年人高血壓病70例觀察[J];中國(guó)康復(fù);1994年03期

3 薛繼生;;自制JD—2型肌電生物反饋儀電極固定架[J];醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生裝備;1990年03期

4 劉志揚(yáng);白玉山;;應(yīng)用肌電生物反饋療法治療重癥神經(jīng)衰弱的臨床觀察[J];黑龍江醫(yī)學(xué);1990年04期

5 劉志揚(yáng);白玉山;;應(yīng)用肌電生物反饋療法治療重癥神經(jīng)衰弱的臨床觀察[J];黑龍江醫(yī)藥;1990年04期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭華芳;肌電生物反饋儀治療膝關(guān)節(jié)僵硬后股四頭肌療效的評(píng)價(jià)[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2061650