本文選題：股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折 + 逆行髓內(nèi)釘�。� 參考：《安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:通過(guò)觀察比較分析股骨逆行髓內(nèi)釘與股骨遠(yuǎn)端鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定治療股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的臨床療效,以探討內(nèi)固定治療股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折更佳的方法。材料與方法:1.研究對(duì)像:本研究為回顧性研究,分析了2007年2月至2014年3月期間收治的54例股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折患者,年齡在20~86歲之間(平均54.6歲),其中采用股骨逆行髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定手術(shù)治療28例,采用股骨遠(yuǎn)端鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定手術(shù)治療26例。2.觀察指標(biāo):a.患者術(shù)前一般資料:性別、年齡、骨折類型、致傷原因、傷后至手術(shù)等待的時(shí)間。b.術(shù)中相關(guān)資料:手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中出血量。c.術(shù)后隨訪資料:骨折愈合的時(shí)間、膝關(guān)節(jié)的功能恢復(fù)情況的Kolmert評(píng)定。3.統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理:采用SPSS19.0統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件,計(jì)量資料用x±S表示,采用t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料采用X2檢驗(yàn),評(píng)價(jià)兩組之間的療效比較,P0.05認(rèn)為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。結(jié)果:54例患者術(shù)后獲得8~24個(gè)月(平均12.8個(gè)月)隨訪,所有病例均獲得了骨性愈合。逆行髓內(nèi)釘組:28例行股骨逆行髓內(nèi)釘內(nèi)固定手術(shù)治療,受傷至手術(shù)的平均等待時(shí)間為5.68±2.67天,平均手術(shù)時(shí)間為154.64±56.07min,術(shù)中平均出血量為388.57±170.77ml。全部獲得隨訪,其中出現(xiàn)膝關(guān)節(jié)中輕度疼痛1例,無(wú)感染、內(nèi)固定松動(dòng)等并發(fā)癥。隨訪后本組的平均骨折愈合時(shí)間為22.54±2.95周。根據(jù)Kolmert膝關(guān)節(jié)功能評(píng)定系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行評(píng)定,在本組患者中,優(yōu):18例,良:6例,可:4例,差:0例,優(yōu)良率85.7%。2.鎖定鋼板組:26例行鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定手術(shù)治療,受傷至手術(shù)的平均等待時(shí)間為5.42±2.21天,平均手術(shù)時(shí)間為131.73±72.99min,術(shù)中平均出血量為403.85±242.46 ml。全部獲得隨訪,其中出現(xiàn)輕度膝內(nèi)翻畸形2例,出現(xiàn)深靜脈血栓1例,無(wú)感染、內(nèi)固定松動(dòng)等并發(fā)癥。隨訪后本組的平均骨折愈合時(shí)間為24.96±3.70周。根據(jù)Kolmert膝關(guān)節(jié)功能評(píng)定系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行評(píng)定,在本組患者中,優(yōu):16例,良:5例,可:4例,差:1例,優(yōu)良率80.8%。3.數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)結(jié)果:在逆行髓內(nèi)釘組和鎖定鋼板組,在手術(shù)時(shí)間和術(shù)中出血量、膝關(guān)節(jié)功能優(yōu)良率方面兩組比較,結(jié)果無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P0.05)。在骨折愈合時(shí)間方面,髓內(nèi)釘組和鎖定鋼板組分別為22.54±2.95周和24.96±3.70周,兩組比較,髓內(nèi)釘組較鎖定鋼板組愈合時(shí)間短,結(jié)果有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論:逆行髓內(nèi)釘與鎖定鋼板均是內(nèi)固定治療股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折的有效方法。相比較而言,逆行髓內(nèi)釘較鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定治療股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折所需的骨折愈合時(shí)間短,更有利于骨折愈合;在膝關(guān)節(jié)功能的恢復(fù)方面,兩者均能獲得滿意的療效。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare and compare the clinical effect of retrograde intramedullary nail and locking plate fixation on distal femoral fracture and to explore the better method of internal fixation for distal femoral fracture. Materials and methods: 1. Subjects: this study was a retrospective analysis of 54 patients with distal femur fractures who were treated between February 2007 and March 2014, aged between 20 and 86 years (mean 54.6 years old), 28 of whom were treated with retrograde intramedullary nail fixation. 26 cases were treated by internal fixation with locking plate of distal femur. The observation index is: A. Preoperative general data: sex, age, fracture type, cause of injury, time from injury to operation. Intraoperative data: operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume. Postoperative follow-up data: fracture healing time, knee function recovery of Kolmert rating. 3. Statistical processing: SPSS 19.0 statistical software, measurement data expressed by x 鹵S, using t test, count data using X2 test, the evaluation of the two groups of curative effect comparison P0.05 think there is statistical significance. Results 54 cases were followed up for 824 months (mean 12.8 months). In retrograde intramedullary nail group, 28 cases were treated with retrograde femoral intramedullary nail fixation. The average waiting time from injury to operation was 5.68 鹵2.67 days, the average operative time was 154.64 鹵56.07 min, and the average intraoperative bleeding was 388.57 鹵170.77 ml. All cases were followed up, including 1 case of mild knee pain, no infection, loosening of internal fixation and other complications. The average healing time was 22.54 鹵2.95 weeks after follow-up. According to Kolmert knee joint function evaluation system, in this group, 18 cases were excellent: 18 cases, 6 cases good: 6 cases, 4 cases: may: 4 cases, 0 cases poor: 0 cases, the excellent and good rate was 85.75.0.2. The average waiting time from injury to operation was 5.42 鹵2.21 days, the average operation time was 131.73 鹵72.99 minutes, and the average blood loss during operation was 403.85 鹵242.46 ml. All cases were followed up, including 2 cases of mild varus genu deformity, 1 case of deep venous thrombosis, no infection, loosening of internal fixation and other complications. The average healing time was 24.96 鹵3.70 weeks. According to Kolmert knee joint function evaluation system, 16 cases were excellent in this group, 5 cases were good: 5 cases were good, 4 cases were fair, 1 case was poor. The excellent and good rate was 80.8.3. Results: in the retrograde intramedullary nail group and the locking plate group, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and the excellent and good rate of knee joint function. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). The healing time of intramedullary nail group and locking plate group were 22.54 鹵2.95 weeks and 24.96 鹵3.70 weeks, respectively. The healing time of intramedullary nail group was shorter than that of locking plate group (P 0.05). Conclusion: both retrograde intramedullary nail and locking plate are effective methods for the treatment of distal femur fracture. In comparison, retrograde intramedullary nail has shorter healing time than locking plate fixation for distal femur fracture, which is more beneficial to fracture healing. Both of them can obtain satisfactory results in the recovery of knee joint function.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：R687.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 李強(qiáng)一,張秋琴,韓擎天,王以進(jìn);股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折三種內(nèi)固定方法生物力學(xué)比較研究與臨床應(yīng)用[J];骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2001年04期

2 丁堅(jiān);周祖彬;陸男吉;羅從風(fēng);曾炳芳;;股骨側(cè)LISS鋼板與逆行髓內(nèi)釘治療浮膝損傷的療效比較[J];中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2010年10期

3 李澤龍;陳慶洲;黃賓;蔡習(xí)煒;周敏;劉發(fā)平;劉喜彬;;解剖型鎖定鋼板內(nèi)固定治療股骨髁部粉碎性骨折[J];中國(guó)骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2010年10期

4 張喜海;陳歌;張忠杰;;鎖定鋼板治療老年股骨遠(yuǎn)端骨折32例臨床分析[J];西南軍醫(yī);2009年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2012908