本文選題：腰5椎體指數(shù) + 有限元模型��； 參考：《南華大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:通過(guò)建立2個(gè)無(wú)腰椎疾患的成人腰5椎體三維有限元模型,并對(duì)2個(gè)有限元模型進(jìn)行有效性驗(yàn)證,探討腰5椎體指數(shù)的減小,與其峽部的應(yīng)力關(guān)系。方法:采集2個(gè)無(wú)腰椎疾患的成人腰5椎體,其指數(shù)分別為70、90的CT數(shù)據(jù)。通過(guò)mimics10.0軟件分離重建單個(gè)腰5椎體幾何模型,將重建的模型導(dǎo)入geomagic11.0使粗糙的幾何模型進(jìn)行光滑等優(yōu)化處理并生成曲面模型,再將曲面模型導(dǎo)入U(xiǎn)GS NX6.0軟件進(jìn)行縫合處理,生成實(shí)體模型。將實(shí)體模型導(dǎo)入ansys14.0有限元軟件,通過(guò)布爾運(yùn)算將模型劃分為皮質(zhì)骨與松質(zhì)骨,再將腰5椎體的皮質(zhì)骨與松質(zhì)骨進(jìn)行粘合,并對(duì)模型賦予單元類(lèi)型及材料屬性,再將實(shí)體模型進(jìn)行有限元網(wǎng)格劃分,對(duì)網(wǎng)格劃分成功的腰5椎體有限元模型的下表面及下關(guān)節(jié)突的所有節(jié)點(diǎn),在各個(gè)方向的自由度施加約束,以及對(duì)腰5椎體上表面和上關(guān)節(jié)突的所有節(jié)點(diǎn)逐步遞增施加軸向載荷,通過(guò)有限元軟件的后處理功能對(duì)腰5椎體峽部進(jìn)行應(yīng)力分析并計(jì)算有限元模型的位移。用Spss19.0軟件統(tǒng)計(jì)兩個(gè)模型雙側(cè)峽部的應(yīng)力值,比較其差異性。結(jié)果:1.腰5椎體指數(shù)為70的有限元模型單元數(shù)47147個(gè),節(jié)點(diǎn)數(shù)71601個(gè),腰5椎體指數(shù)為90的有限元模型單元數(shù)37895個(gè),節(jié)點(diǎn)數(shù)57646個(gè)。通過(guò)對(duì)模型逐步遞增施加載荷,其壓縮-位移數(shù)據(jù)在國(guó)外文獻(xiàn)報(bào)道的體外實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)的范圍之間。2.在500N的作用力下,對(duì)照組峽部應(yīng)力值1.04±0.12,參照組峽部應(yīng)力值2.03±0.10,兩組對(duì)比(P0.05)。在1000N的作用力下,對(duì)照組峽部應(yīng)力值2.30±0.22,參照組峽部應(yīng)力值3.29±0.34,兩組對(duì)比(P0.05)。在1500N的作用力下,對(duì)照組峽部應(yīng)力值4.05±0.28,參照組峽部應(yīng)力值4.81±0.55,兩組對(duì)比(P0.05)。在2000N的作用力下,對(duì)照組峽部應(yīng)力值6.85±0.52,參照組峽部應(yīng)力值9.07±0.54,兩組對(duì)比(P0.05)。對(duì)照組及觀察組的峽部應(yīng)力值分別在500N、1000N、1500N、2000N之間比較有差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論:1.成功建立了2個(gè)腰5椎體指數(shù)分別為70、90的有限元模型,并驗(yàn)證了兩個(gè)椎體指數(shù)分別為70、90的有限元模型的有效性。2.椎體指數(shù)小的腰5峽部所承受的應(yīng)力要大于椎體指數(shù)大的腰5峽部所承受的應(yīng)力。并且隨著載荷的增大,雙側(cè)峽部的應(yīng)力也隨之增大。若腰5椎體指數(shù)較小的峽部長(zhǎng)期處于高負(fù)荷狀態(tài)下,其腰5峽部可能更容易出現(xiàn)崩裂。
[Abstract]:Objective: to establish two three dimensional finite element models of lumbar 5 vertebrae in adults without lumbar disease, and to verify the validity of the two finite element models, and to explore the relationship between the decrease of lumbar 5 vertebral body index and the stress in the isthmus. Methods: the CT data of lumbar 5 vertebrae of 2 adults without lumbar disease were 70 ~ 90 respectively. A single lumbar 5 vertebrae geometry model was reconstructed by mimics10.0 software. The reconstructed model was imported into geomagic11.0 to make rough geometry model smooth and optimized, and the surface model was generated. The surface model was imported into UGS NX6.0 software for suture. Generate entity model. The solid model was imported into ansys14.0 finite element software. The model was divided into cortical bone and cancellous bone by Boolean operation. The cortical bone and cancellous bone of lumbar 5 vertebrae were bonded to each other, and the unit type and material attribute were assigned to the model. Then the solid model is meshed by finite element method, and all the nodes of the lower surface and the lower articular process of the lumbar 5 vertebrae finite element model, which are successfully meshed, are constrained by the degrees of freedom in all directions. The axial load on the upper surface of the lumbar 5 vertebra and all the nodes of the upper articular process is gradually applied. The stress of the isthmus of the lumbar 5 vertebrae is analyzed and the displacement of the finite element model is calculated by the post processing function of the finite element software. The stress values of bilateral isthmus of the two models were calculated by Spss19.0 software and the differences were compared. The result is 1: 1. The finite element number of lumbar 5 vertebral body index is 70, the number of finite element model is 47147, the number of nodes is 71601, the finite element number of lumbar 5 vertebral body index is 90 and the number of finite element model is 37895 and the number of nodes is 57646. By gradually increasing the load on the model, the compression-displacement data between the range of in vitro experimental data reported in foreign literature. The stress of isthmus in the control group was 1.04 鹵0.12, and that in the control group was 2.03 鹵0.10 under the action force of 500N. The isthmus stress of the control group was 2.30 鹵0.22, and that of the control group was 3.29 鹵0.34. The stress of isthmus in the control group was 4.05 鹵0.28, that in the control group was 4.81 鹵0.55, and that in the control group was 4.81 鹵0.55. The stress of isthmus in the control group was 6.85 鹵0.52, and that in the control group was 9.07 鹵0.54, which was compared with that in the control group (P 0.05). The stress values of isthmus in the control group and the observation group were significantly different from those in the control group and the observation group respectively between 500 Nu 1000N and 1500 Nu 2000N (P 0.05). Conclusion 1. Two finite element models with L5 vertebral body index of 70 ~ 90 were successfully established, and the validity of two finite element models with L5 vertebral body index of 70 ~ 90 was verified. The stress of the lumbar 5 isthmus with small vertebral body index is greater than that of the lumbar 5 isthmus with large vertebral body index. And with the increase of load, the stress of bilateral isthmus also increases. If the isthmus with low lumbar 5 body mass index is in high load for a long time, the lumbar 5 isthmus may be more prone to collapse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R687.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉海春,湯繼文,陳允震,張劍峰;峽部植骨固定治療腰椎椎弓峽部不連性下腰痛[J];頸腰痛雜志;2005年02期

2 樊道斌;邢飛;張林勝;楊國(guó)平;;經(jīng)峽部外緣途徑手術(shù)治療極外側(cè)腰椎間盤(pán)突出癥[J];頸腰痛雜志;2007年03期

3 朱愨;黃晶;;右房峽部的影像解剖特征研究進(jìn)展[J];心血管病學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年04期

4 趙麗娟;梁惠林;;治療青少年腰椎峽部不連的手術(shù)護(hù)理[J];中醫(yī)藥導(dǎo)報(bào);2006年07期

5 劉扣有,葛寶豐;峽部不連的帶肌蒂骨瓣轉(zhuǎn)位側(cè)固定術(shù)[J];西北國(guó)防醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;1985年03期

6 楊振武，高瑞亭;運(yùn)動(dòng)員腰椎峽部骨折的生物力學(xué)研究[J];中國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;1997年04期

7 高從敬,宋一平,朱麗麗;正常腰椎峽部CT解剖學(xué)研究[J];中國(guó)解剖與臨床;2000年01期

8 高從敬,宋一平,張發(fā)惠,鐘桂午;正常腰椎峽部CT解剖學(xué)研究[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2004年14期

9 曹學(xué)偉;李牧;;峽部固定治療腰椎峽部不連36例遠(yuǎn)期療效觀察[J];山東醫(yī)藥;2007年06期

10 楊維權(quán)，賈連順，連平，孫榮華，丁祖泉，，徐燕青;峽部斷離對(duì)腰椎穩(wěn)定性影響的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];中國(guó)脊柱脊髓雜志;1995年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 劉海春;陳允震;湯繼文;桑錫光;;單節(jié)段峽部植骨固定治療腰椎峽部不連的臨床分析[A];第二屆海峽兩岸矯形外科學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

2 樊道斌;邢飛;張林勝;楊國(guó)平;;經(jīng)峽部外緣途徑手術(shù)治療極外側(cè)腰椎間盤(pán)突出癥[A];第二屆華東地區(qū)骨科學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)暨山東省第九次骨科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2007年

3 楊振武;高瑞亭;;運(yùn)動(dòng)員第五腰椎峽部骨折的生物力學(xué)研究[A];第六屆全國(guó)運(yùn)動(dòng)生物力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要匯編[C];1988年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 湯凱文;腰5椎體指數(shù)的減小對(duì)其峽部應(yīng)力影響的有限元分析[D];南華大學(xué);2015年

2 田勇;峽部應(yīng)力測(cè)量分析脊椎峽部裂的危險(xiǎn)因素[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2008年

3 曹學(xué)偉;峽部固定治療腰椎峽部不連的遠(yuǎn)期療效分析[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

4 吳志剛;椎弓根釘、椎板鉤加峽部植骨術(shù)治療腰椎峽部不連的手術(shù)治療體會(huì)[D];延邊大學(xué);2012年

5 張志;腰椎峽部的疲勞特性和應(yīng)力傳導(dǎo)分布特征的研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2010年

6 李玉華;成人腰椎峽部不連及滑脫的療效分析及治療策略[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

本文編號(hào)：2010058