雙支架技術(shù)在經(jīng)頸靜脈肝內(nèi)門(mén)體分流術(shù)中的應(yīng)用
本文選題:經(jīng)頸靜脈肝內(nèi)門(mén)體分流術(shù) + 支架 ; 參考:《中國(guó)介入影像與治療學(xué)》2017年02期
【摘要】:目的對(duì)比分析應(yīng)用3種支架植入方式[裸支架、覆膜支架、雙支架(裸支架+覆膜支架)]行經(jīng)頸靜脈肝內(nèi)門(mén)體分流術(shù)(TIPSS)的分流效果、對(duì)肝功能的影響和中遠(yuǎn)期通暢率。方法回顧性分析因肝硬化門(mén)靜脈高壓合并上消化道出血行TIPSS治療的178例患者的臨床資料,比較3種支架的臨床療效、肝功能恢復(fù)時(shí)間、術(shù)后1年一期和二期通暢率。結(jié)果 178例患者中,成功植入支架175例,成功率為98.31%(175/178),其中裸支架52例,覆膜支架52例,雙支架71例。所有患者的出血均得到控制。裸支架組、覆膜支架組、雙支架組肝功能恢復(fù)正常時(shí)間分別為(5.3±1.4)天、(9.8±1.7)天、(6.2±1.7)天,裸支架組和雙支架組與覆膜支架組的差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均0.01),裸支架組和雙支架組間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。裸支架組、覆膜支架組和雙支架組1年一期通暢率分別為78.84%(41/52)、84.61%(44/52)、90.14%(64/71),兩兩比較差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P均0.01);1年二期通暢率均為100%。結(jié)論采用雙支架技術(shù)行TIPSS技術(shù),對(duì)肝功能影響小,可提高中遠(yuǎn)期通暢率,可作為Viatorr支架的替代選擇。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare and analyze the shunt effect of three stents (bare stents, covered stents, double stents (bare stents covered stents) with TIPSS), and the effect of TIPSSs on the liver function and the patency rate in the medium and long term. Methods the clinical data of 178 patients with portal hypertension complicated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to cirrhosis were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical effects of three stents, the recovery time of liver function, and the patency rate of one year and two stages after operation were compared. Results among 178 patients, 175 cases were stents successfully implanted, the success rate was 98.31% 17.5% 178%, including 52 cases of bare stents, 52 cases of covered stents and 71 cases of double stents. Bleeding was controlled in all patients. The recovery time of liver function in bare stent group, covered stent group and double stent group were 5.3 鹵1.4 days and 9.8 鹵1.7 days respectively. There was significant difference between bare stent group and double stent group and covered stent group (P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference between bare stent group and double stent group (P 0.05). The one-stage patency rates of bare stent group, covered stent group and double stent group were 78.84% and 84.61%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion double stent TIPSS technique has little effect on liver function and can improve the patency rate in medium and long term. It can be used as an alternative to Viatorr stent.
【作者單位】: 白求恩國(guó)際和平醫(yī)院放射科;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:R657.3
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫振興;李兆申;鄒多武;金震東;陳潔;汪鵬;吳仁培;萬(wàn)榮;;膽管雙支架置入操作技巧及價(jià)值[J];實(shí)用臨床醫(yī)藥雜志;2006年01期
2 高X;戴定可;翟仁友;錢(qián)曉軍;;高位膽管梗阻的雙支架介入治療[J];介入放射學(xué)雜志;2006年12期
3 李兆申,許國(guó)銘,孫振興,鄒多武,鄒曉平,金震東;膽胰管良惡性梗阻的雙支架聯(lián)合引流[J];中華消化內(nèi)鏡雜志;2002年01期
4 林愛(ài)軍;郭啟勇;劉兆玉;盧再鳴;;雙支架留置術(shù)治療惡性氣管、食管狹窄[J];生物醫(yī)學(xué)工程與臨床;2010年03期
5 王學(xué)靜;賈廣志;李建明;高同鎖;白淑芳;;國(guó)產(chǎn)鎳鈦合金食管、氣管雙支架的臨床應(yīng)用[J];實(shí)用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2009年05期
6 韓新巍,吳剛,高雪梅,馬南,王艷麗,李永東;食管氣管雙支架的臨床應(yīng)用[J];介入放射學(xué)雜志;2005年02期
7 徐澤升;王炳勛;霍勇;;冠狀動(dòng)脈介入治療的雙支架技術(shù)[J];中國(guó)介入心臟病學(xué)雜志;2011年03期
8 王福安;郭金和;朱光宇;滕皋軍;何仕誠(chéng);鄧鋼;方文;李國(guó)昭;;食管氣管雙支架的臨床應(yīng)用分析[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué);2009年02期
9 莊偉;周關(guān)樹(shù);;食管癌術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)置放食管及氣管雙支架一例[J];中華消化內(nèi)鏡雜志;2006年05期
10 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條
1 莊偉;周美樹(shù);;食管癌術(shù)后復(fù)發(fā)行食管及氣管雙支架1例[A];2005年浙江省消化系疾病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2005年
,本文編號(hào):1955706
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1955706.html