本文選題：單邊內(nèi)固定 + 腰椎間盤突出癥　； 參考：《承德醫(yī)學院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的:探討應用Mast quadrant可擴張通道系統(tǒng)行單邊椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合椎間Cage植骨融合術治療腰椎間盤突出癥的臨床療效。方法:針對我科2014年1月到2016年1月住院,行腰椎間盤切除、椎間Cage植入融合、椎弓根釘內(nèi)固定手術的147例腰椎間盤突出癥病人進行回顧性分析,其中應用Mast quadrant可擴張通道系統(tǒng)行單邊內(nèi)固定治療的患者59例,平均隨訪20.39±4.45個月;采用傳統(tǒng)開放TLIF行雙邊內(nèi)固定治療的患者88例,平均隨訪19.85±4.64個月。對比分析兩組病人的一般資料、術后住院天數(shù)、手術時間、術中出血量、住院治療費用、手術前后的疼痛視覺模擬評分(VAS)和日本骨科協(xié)會評估治療(JOA)評分、植骨融合率、術后48h肌酸激酶(CK)升高值及并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生情況。結果:(1)與雙邊內(nèi)固定組比較,通道下單邊內(nèi)固定治療的患者的手術時間明顯縮短(P0.05),術中失血量明顯減少(P0.05),單邊組術后48h肌酸激酶(CK)升高值比雙邊組要低(P0.05)。(2)兩組之間的術后住院時間、住院治療費用比較差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);末次隨訪VAS、ODI、JOA評分以及植骨融合率比較差異均無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結論:Mast quadrant可擴張通道系統(tǒng)下行單邊內(nèi)固定并椎間融合治療單間隙腰椎間盤突出癥與傳統(tǒng)開放TLIF雙邊內(nèi)固定的療效相同,但通道下單邊內(nèi)固定具有手術創(chuàng)傷小、手術時間短、出血量少等優(yōu)點,但手術適應癥需嚴格控制。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the clinical effect of unilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with intervertebral Cage fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with Mast quadrant extensible channel system. Methods: a retrospective analysis was performed on 147 patients with lumbar disc herniation who were hospitalized from January 2014 to January 2016, underwent lumbar discectomy, intervertebral Cage implantation and fusion, and pedicle screw fixation. 59 patients treated with unilateral internal fixation with Mast quadrant extensible channel system were followed up for an average of 20.39 鹵4.45 months, and 88 patients with conventional open TLIF for bilateral internal fixation were followed up for an average of 19.85 鹵4.64 months. The general data, postoperative hospitalization days, operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, hospitalization cost, pain visual analogue score before and after operation (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, bone graft fusion rate, were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Creatine kinase (CK) increased at 48 h after operation and complications occurred. Results compared with bilateral internal fixation group, The operation time of patients treated with unilateral internal fixation under the channel was significantly shorter than that of the bilateral group, and the postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups was significantly lower than that in the bilateral group, and the blood loss during the operation was significantly reduced in the unilateral group, and the increase of creatine kinase (CK) in the unilateral group at 48 hours after operation was lower than that in the bilateral group. There was no significant difference in the cost of hospitalization (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the JOA score and bone graft fusion rate (P 0.05) during the last follow-up. Conclusion the effect of one-sided internal fixation and intervertebral fusion in the treatment of single-space lumbar disc herniation is the same as that of traditional open TLIF bilateral fixation, but the unilateral internal fixation under the channel has the advantages of minimal surgical trauma and short operative time. The amount of bleeding is low, but the indication of operation should be strictly controlled.
【學位授予單位】：承德醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R687.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 譚健;李平元;歐軍;蘇小桃;盧政好;;單側椎弓根螺釘固定聯(lián)合椎間融合術治療腰椎間盤突出癥[J];實用骨科雜志;2015年01期

2 劉賓;;腰椎間盤突出癥手術治療的臨床探析[J];中國衛(wèi)生產(chǎn)業(yè);2014年05期

3 曾忠友;吳鵬;陳國軍;嚴衛(wèi)鋒;張建喬;裴斐;唐宏超;宋永興;韓建福;;腰椎雙節(jié)段不同固定方式穩(wěn)定性的生物力學研究[J];中華創(chuàng)傷雜志;2014年02期

4 王志榮;陸愛清;楊惠林;王素春;陳勇;陳國平;;Quadrant通道下TLIF術治療復發(fā)性腰椎間盤突出癥的療效分析[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2014年02期

5 范里;楊波;陳家祿;鄭望茍;徐勇;;可擴張微創(chuàng)通道管系統(tǒng)下單切口治療退行性腰椎管狹窄癥[J];中國微創(chuàng)外科雜志;2013年02期

6 臧加成;馬信龍;王濤;馬劍雄;田鵬;韓超;;單側與雙側椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定在短節(jié)段腰椎融合手術中療效比較的meta分析[J];中華外科雜志;2012年09期

7 吳文堅;梁裕;張興凱;曹鵬;鄭濤;;微創(chuàng)單側入路雙側減壓治療腰椎椎管狹窄癥早期療效觀察[J];脊柱外科雜志;2012年03期

8 劉偉峰;王生介;夏才偉;厲曉龍;楊雷;蔣小軍;;單側椎弓根螺釘內(nèi)固定聯(lián)合椎間融合術治療腰椎間盤突出癥[J];國際骨科學雜志;2012年03期

9 厲曉龍;王生介;夏才偉;劉偉峰;楊雷;蔣小軍;;單側椎弓根釘固定結合椎間融合治療腰椎間盤突出癥[J];中國組織工程研究;2012年17期

10 吳占勇;吳華榮;趙桂群;韓長嶺;;腰椎間融合單、雙側內(nèi)固定術的生物力學分析[J];實用骨科雜志;2011年10期

，

本文編號：1893502