本文選題：連續(xù)腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯 + 電流強(qiáng)度��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的分析不同的電流強(qiáng)度行連續(xù)腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯對(duì)人工髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后的鎮(zhèn)痛效果。方法選擇全麻下行人工髖關(guān)節(jié)置換手術(shù)的患者120例(ASA Ⅰ～Ⅲ級(jí)),隨機(jī)分為四組(n=30):A組舒芬太尼靜脈鎮(zhèn)痛泵組,N組選用神經(jīng)刺激器行連續(xù)腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯,N1組選擇的電流強(qiáng)度為0.1～0.5mA,N2組選擇0.6～1.0m,N3組選擇1.1～2.0mA。四組患者均行靜吸復(fù)合全身麻醉行氣管插管。N組患者全麻誘導(dǎo)前行連續(xù)腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯,通過(guò)留置導(dǎo)管自控泵入0.2%羅哌卡因,A組患者術(shù)后靜脈給予舒芬太尼自控鎮(zhèn)痛,四組患者均維持鎮(zhèn)痛48小時(shí)。分別記錄各組患者術(shù)后不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)靜息VAS疼痛評(píng)分(RVAS)和主動(dòng)活動(dòng)的VAS疼痛評(píng)分(IVAS)、自控鍵按鍵次數(shù)、患者總體滿(mǎn)意度及不良反應(yīng)。結(jié)果N1組與N2組術(shù)后RVAS和IVAS評(píng)分無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異,N3組RVAS和IVAS評(píng)分明顯高于N1組和N2組(p0.05),A組RVAS和IVAS評(píng)分明顯高于N1、N2組(p0.05);N1組與N2組自控鍵48h按鍵次數(shù)無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異,N3組自控鍵 48h 按鍵次數(shù)(3.90 ± 0.96)明顯高于 N1 組(1.93 土 0.98)和 N2 組(2.06 ± 0.98)(p0.01);四組患者的總體滿(mǎn)意度較高;N1-N3組惡心、嘔吐、瘙癢、鎮(zhèn)靜過(guò)度等不良反應(yīng)均無(wú)明顯統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異,不良反應(yīng)A組明顯多于N1-N3組(p0.05)。結(jié)論選用0.6～1.0mA電流強(qiáng)度下行連續(xù)腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯用于人工髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后自控鎮(zhèn)痛可達(dá)到滿(mǎn)意效果,且鎮(zhèn)痛效果優(yōu)于靜脈自控鎮(zhèn)痛,減少術(shù)后不良反應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze the analgesic effect of continuous lumbar plexus block with different electric current intensity after hip arthroplasty. Methods one hundred and twenty patients undergoing artificial hip replacement under general anesthesia were randomly divided into four groups: sufentanil intravenous analgesia pump group (n = 40) and continuous lumbar plexus block group N (n = 1). The flow intensity was 0.1 ~ 0.5mAN _ 2 group and 0.6 ~ 1.0mN _ 3 group was chosen, and the flow intensity was 1.1 ~ 2.0mA. All the patients in the four groups were treated with intravenous inhalation combined with general anesthesia. The patients in group N received continuous lumbar plexus nerve block before induction under general anesthesia. Sufentanil was administered intravenously to patients in group A by self-controlled infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine via indwelling catheter. Analgesia was maintained for 48 hours in all the four groups. The rest VAS pain score and active activity VAS pain score were recorded at different time points after operation, the number of keystrokes, the patients' overall satisfaction and adverse reactions were recorded. Results there was no significant difference in RVAS and IVAS scores between N1 group and N2 group. The scores of RVAS and IVAS in N3 group were significantly higher than those in N1 group and N2 group. The scores of RVAS and IVAS in group N _ 1 and N _ 2 group were significantly higher than those in group N _ 1N _ 2 group and N _ 2 group. The number of keys in 48 hours was 3.90 鹵0.96), which was significantly higher than that in N1 group (1.93 鹵0.98) and N2 group (2.06 鹵0.98) p0.01.The overall satisfaction of the four groups was higher than that of N1-N3 group. There was no significant difference in adverse reactions such as vomiting, pruritus and excessive sedation. The adverse reactions in group A were significantly higher than those in group N1-N3 (P 0.05). Conclusion continuous lumbar plexus block with 0.6~1.0mA electric current intensity can achieve satisfactory analgesia effect after artificial hip arthroplasty, and the analgesic effect is better than that of intravenous analgesia, which can reduce the adverse reaction after operation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R614

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 畢建礎(chǔ);陳順佑;;腰叢及其主要分支的起源[J];解剖學(xué)通報(bào);1965年04期

2 文道亮;右下腹刀刺傷合并右側(cè)腰叢損傷1例誤診分析[J];黑龍江醫(yī)學(xué);2004年04期

3 鄧兆宏;陳龍菊;王先義;范吉云;郭國(guó)榮;李紅霞;李珍;孫占鋒;;腰叢阻滯相關(guān)解剖結(jié)構(gòu)的觀測(cè)[J];中國(guó)康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年01期

4 劉軍漢,趙磊,陳加友;連續(xù)性腰叢阻滯在髖關(guān)節(jié)術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛的應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)交通醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

5 蘇榆;;腰大肌間隙腰叢阻滯臨床應(yīng)用的進(jìn)一步探討[J];安徽醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1985年01期

6 張衛(wèi)東;張?jiān)?朱可艷;;連續(xù)腰叢阻滯在下肢關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛的應(yīng)用[J];江蘇醫(yī)藥;2012年21期

7 韓曉東;張學(xué)政;倪建武;王權(quán)光;陳麗梅;張?jiān)?jiān);徐旭仲;;腰叢置管分次給局麻藥用于全膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛[J];溫州醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

8 杜心如,陳遠(yuǎn),方丹;右下腹刀刺傷合并左側(cè)腰叢損傷1例[J];實(shí)用外科雜志;1993年04期

9 程文華,楊飛,郝朝森,李志友,黨海英;腰叢阻滯在兒麻后遺癥矯形術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;1999年01期

10 李娜;郭英;;右美托咪定聯(lián)合腰叢-坐股神經(jīng)阻滯在老年患者脛骨骨折手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];吉林醫(yī)學(xué);2014年13期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 徐旭仲;曹親親;盧圓圓;陳麗梅;郭獻(xiàn)陽(yáng);;老年患者股骨粗隆骨折手術(shù)應(yīng)用腰叢阻滯和硬膜外麻醉的臨床對(duì)比研究[A];2008年第七次華東六省一市麻醉學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨浙江省麻醉學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編（下冊(cè)）[C];2008年

2 吳良泉;;腰叢阻滯在單側(cè)下肢手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)疼痛學(xué)分會(huì)第六屆年會(huì)論文摘要[C];2005年

3 徐宏偉;張?zhí)m;曹偉;張翔;張文勝;;相同劑量不同濃度的羅哌卡因用于腰叢坐骨神經(jīng)聯(lián)合阻滯的臨床效果及藥代動(dòng)力學(xué)變化[A];2009年西部麻醉學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文匯編[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 卿朝輝;腰叢聯(lián)合局部浸潤(rùn)用于單側(cè)膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛的臨床研究[D];南方醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年

2 呂銳;雙重引導(dǎo)腰叢阻滯沙灘椅法與短軸平面內(nèi)法對(duì)比研究[D];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2016年

3 李健;不同掃描方法實(shí)施超聲引導(dǎo)腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯的隨機(jī)對(duì)照研究：PMTS-ITS Versus Shamrock[D];華中科技大學(xué);2016年

4 鄧姍;連續(xù)前路腰叢神經(jīng)阻滯用于膝關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛的臨床觀察[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2010年

5 張宇;超聲引導(dǎo)下腰叢神經(jīng)或骶管阻滯用于小兒髖關(guān)節(jié)矯形術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛的對(duì)照研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1822981