本文選題：骨折　切入點：不愈合　出處：《重慶醫(yī)學》2017年01期

【摘要】：目的研究股骨近端防旋髓內釘(PFNA)和人工股骨頭置換術(FHPR)治療高齡骨質疏松不穩(wěn)定股骨轉子間骨折的臨床療效。方法選取該院2010-2014年高齡嚴重骨質疏松不穩(wěn)定型轉子間骨折患者共30例,采用區(qū)組隨機分組法將患者分成A、B兩組(各15例患者)。A組采用PFNA治療方式,B組采用FHPR治療方式。比較兩組病例術中出血量、手術時間、平均住院時間、下地活動時間及術后6周Harris評分,觀察兩種手術方式治療老年嚴重骨質疏松性不穩(wěn)定型股骨轉子間骨折的近期療效。結果平均失血量A組為(200.3±50.6)mL,B組為(456.2±60.2)mL,兩組比較差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。A組術后平均下地活動時間為(30.2±10.1)d,B組為(14.2±7.0)d,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P=0.005)。結論 FHPR是治療老年性不穩(wěn)定性轉子間骨折的有效方法。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the clinical effect of proximal femoral intramedullary nail (PFNA) and artificial femoral head replacement (FHPR) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur in elderly patients.Methods A total of 30 patients with severe unstable intertrochanteric fracture of osteoporosis were selected from 2010 to 2014. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A (n = 15) and group B (n = 15) were treated by PFNA. Group B was treated with FHPR.The amount of intraoperative bleeding, operative time, average hospitalization time, floor movement time and Harris score at 6 weeks after operation were compared between the two groups, and the short-term efficacy of the two surgical methods in the treatment of senile severe unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture was observed.Conclusion FHPR is an effective method for the treatment of senile unstable intertrochanteric fracture.
【作者單位】： 重慶市大足區(qū)人民醫(yī)院骨科;
【分類號】：R687.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 竇書庭，，馬國林，李海梅,馬躍飛;股骨距解剖與X線初步觀察[J];長治醫(yī)學院學報;1995年02期

2 黨瑞山,陳爾瑜,蔡國君,黃會龍;股骨距的應用解剖[J];解剖學雜志;2001年06期

3 嚴廣斌;;股骨距[J];中華關節(jié)外科雜志(電子版);2008年03期

4 雷林革;于進祥;杜東鵬;李金翠;姜文雄;黃偉;;股骨轉子間骨折人工股骨頭置換術中股骨距的重建[J];臨床軍醫(yī)雜志;2010年01期

5 崔正禮;;骨水泥型人工股骨頭置換術治療高齡股骨粗隆間粉碎性骨折臨床觀察[J];山東醫(yī)藥;2010年03期

6 夏春波;秦小云;沈洪濤;李建全;劉源R

本文編號：1710985