不同方式灌注骨水泥治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的比較
本文選題:骨質(zhì)疏松性骨折 切入點(diǎn):骨折 出處:《中國(guó)組織工程研究》2017年14期 論文類(lèi)型:期刊論文
【摘要】:背景:骨水泥灌注治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折后,隨著骨質(zhì)疏松的進(jìn)行和骨水泥與骨組織間隙的增大,骨水泥-骨界面的抗壓縮和抗扭轉(zhuǎn)能力下降,骨水泥塊在椎體內(nèi)的微運(yùn)動(dòng)幅度增加,易導(dǎo)致傷椎再骨折發(fā)生。目的:探討3種方式灌注骨水泥治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的臨床療效。方法:以單椎體骨質(zhì)疏松性壓縮骨折患者為研究對(duì)象,進(jìn)行椎體成形術(shù)、椎體后凸成形術(shù)及椎體成形術(shù)分次灌注骨水泥治療各60例,整理相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù),分析椎體內(nèi)骨水泥塊的類(lèi)別與治療方式的關(guān)系,了解患者長(zhǎng)期疼痛緩解及日;顒(dòng)功能改善、椎體高度及骨水泥塊形態(tài)位置改變、傷椎再骨折發(fā)生等情況。結(jié)果與結(jié)論:(1)3組治療后的目測(cè)類(lèi)比評(píng)分、Oswestry功能障礙指數(shù)和Cobb's角均較治療前改善(P0.05);治療后6個(gè)月與末次隨訪相比差異無(wú)顯著性意義,各時(shí)間點(diǎn)組間相比差異無(wú)顯著性意義,說(shuō)明3種方法緩解疼痛和恢復(fù)行動(dòng)的效果無(wú)差異,均能夠防止椎體高度丟失,維護(hù)脊柱的力學(xué)性能;(2)骨水泥形態(tài)位置發(fā)生改變及傷椎再骨折均出現(xiàn)在團(tuán)塊型骨水泥病例中,為增加長(zhǎng)期療效,在灌注骨水泥時(shí)應(yīng)盡可能在椎體內(nèi)形成混合型或骨小梁型骨水泥。
[Abstract]:Background: with the development of osteoporosis and the increase of the gap between bone cement and bone tissue, the anti-compression and anti-torsion ability of bone cement-bone interface is decreased after the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with bone cement infusion. The micromotion of bone cement in the vertebral body increased, Objective: to investigate the clinical effect of three kinds of cement infusion in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Methods: vertebroplasty was performed in patients with osteoporotic compression fracture of single vertebral body. 60 cases of vertebral kyphoplasty and 60 cases of vertebroplasty were treated with bone cement respectively. The data were collected, and the relationship between the types of bone cement and the treatment methods was analyzed to understand the long-term pain relief and the improvement of daily activity function of the patients. Changes in the height of the vertebral body and the shape and location of the bone cement block, Results and conclusion Oswestry dysfunction index and Cobb's angle in the three groups after treatment were better than those before treatment, and there was no significant difference between the 6 months after treatment and the last follow-up. There was no significant difference between the three groups at different time points, which showed that there was no difference in the effect of the three methods in relieving pain and restoring action, and all of them could prevent the loss of vertebral height. Maintenance of the mechanical properties of the spine. (2) changes in the morphology and location of bone cement and refracture of injured vertebrae were found in mass cement cases, in order to increase long-term curative effect. Mixed or trabecular cement should be formed in the vertebral body as much as possible.
【作者單位】: 莒縣人民醫(yī)院介入科;鄆城縣人民醫(yī)院放射科;解放軍濟(jì)南軍區(qū)總醫(yī)院醫(yī)學(xué)影像科;
【基金】:國(guó)家高技術(shù)研究發(fā)展計(jì)劃(863計(jì)劃)資助(2013AA032203)~~
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:R687.3
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 胡孔足;椎體成形術(shù)后的組織學(xué)變化[J];臨床骨科雜志;2004年04期
2 W.Brinjikji;B.A.Comstock;P.J.Heagerty;J.G.Jarvik;D.F.Kallmes;葛傳彪;;椎體成形術(shù)的功效與安全性的調(diào)查研究:設(shè)盲效力的詳細(xì)分析[J];國(guó)際醫(yī)學(xué)放射學(xué)雜志;2010年06期
3 鄭楊;;椎體成形術(shù)治療老年腰背彎曲[J];健康博覽;2006年08期
4 徐寶山,唐天駟;椎體成形術(shù)的現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展方向[J];中華骨科雜志;2001年08期
5 趙必增;椎體成形術(shù)及其進(jìn)展[J];骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2001年06期
6 陸儉,唐天駟,楊惠林;椎體成形術(shù)治療骨質(zhì)疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)脊柱脊髓雜志;2002年04期
7 滕海軍,周躍;椎體成形術(shù)和后凸成形術(shù)[J];中國(guó)矯形外科雜志;2003年01期
8 滕海軍,周躍,初同偉;椎體成形術(shù)中心肺功能變化的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];中國(guó)脊柱脊髓雜志;2003年09期
9 徐楊,陳統(tǒng)一;椎體成形術(shù)的研究進(jìn)展和發(fā)展方向[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2003年05期
10 田云虎,劉亞,邵連芹,朱兵,李忠玉;椎體成形術(shù)中骨水泥量對(duì)椎體機(jī)械性能的影響[J];濰坊醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 魏紅沁;邵將;賈連順;;椎體成形術(shù)的現(xiàn)代概念[A];2009第十七屆全國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合骨傷科學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文匯編[C];2009年
2 陳錦平;;椎體成形術(shù)中的應(yīng)注意問(wèn)題及相關(guān)進(jìn)展[A];2011年浙江省骨科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨骨關(guān)節(jié)創(chuàng)傷診治新進(jìn)展學(xué)習(xí)班資料集[C];2011年
3 何偉濤;孫金,
本文編號(hào):1631669
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/waikelunwen/1631669.html