本文選題：矢狀位　切入點：平衡　出處：《皖南醫(yī)學院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：目的引起脊柱-骨盆矢狀位失衡的原因有很多種,其中包括骨質疏松癥為基礎所致的椎體壓縮性骨折(致胸、腰椎段骨折)等,嚴重的脊柱-骨盆結構損壞會破壞脊柱-骨盆矢狀位平衡,對于由以上原因所致的脊柱-骨盆矢狀位失衡,經皮椎體成形術(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)來重新建立椎體的各面之間的平衡,特別是矢狀位上的平衡關系,目前在臨床上應用比較廣泛,本研究通過比較PVP手術前后患者脊柱-骨盆矢狀位平衡參數及相關量表數值的差異,探討脊柱矢狀位平衡重建對PVP術后患者功能恢復的影響。方法運用回顧性對照的方法分析皖南醫(yī)學院第一附屬醫(yī)院脊柱骨科2014年04月~2015年11月所選取的52個病例(男性12人,女性40人,平均年齡為68.25歲,年齡范圍58歲~85歲)PVP手術前后患者頸椎前凸角(CL)、胸椎后凸角(TK)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、脊柱矢狀位平衡(SVA)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆傾斜角(PT)、骶骨傾斜角(SS)、下腰痛JOA評分、Oswestry腰背下肢功能障礙評分、VAS疼痛評分等指標的變化差異,52個病例中,胸段骨折21人,腰段骨折31人。結果52例患者手術均順利完成,無手術或圍手術期死亡病例出現,術后隨訪時間1~6個月,平均時間4.5個月。術前CL9.212°±30.499°、TK41.385°±27.957°、LL59.135°±36.367°、SVA20.692mm±85.861mm、PI71.614°±35.303°、PT30.635°±19.811°、SS54.700°±31.944°、JOA評分8.385±2.162、Oswestry評分34.808±3.042、VAS評分6.808±0.971。術后CL9.077°±16.384°、TK24.635°±13.233°、LL42.865°±8.765°、SVA-20.962mm±47.397mm、PI38.173°±7.326°、PT14.000°±3.492°、SS34.519°±5.497°、JOA評分24.058±2.118、Oswestry評分12.539±1.787、VAS評分1.712±0.696。脊柱—骨盆矢狀位參數指標CL值在手術前后比較,其差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);術后TK、LL、SVA、PI、PT、SS等測量參數與術前比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);VAS評分、JOA評分、ODI評分與術前比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05);CL與PI及PT之間密切相關(P0.01,CL與PI比較;P0.05,CL與PT比較);TK與PT之間密切相關(P0.01);PI與PT之間密切相關(P0.01)。結論脊柱的平衡包括水平面上、冠狀面上的以及矢狀位上的平衡,由于人類脊柱生理彎曲的存在,使得脊柱矢狀位平衡在維持人體正常姿勢中起到極為重要的作用;脊柱-骨盆系統(tǒng)作為一個整體,任何一方的結構損傷及破壞都會引起相關聯的一系列脊柱矢狀位參數的改變,各參數之間關系密切;因各種原因導致的脊柱-骨盆矢狀位失衡,采用經皮椎體成形術重建脊柱-骨盆的平衡可以取得良好的臨床療效,不僅表現為相關參數的恢復正�；蚪咏�,也表現為相關評估量表的改善;PVP術后患者脊柱-骨盆矢狀位參數的重建對患者術后恢復及生活質量的改善有重要的促進作用,臨床醫(yī)生應當更加重視脊柱-骨盆矢狀位參數評價體系在臨床上應用。
[Abstract]:Objective there are many causes of spinal and pelvic sagittal imbalance, including vertebral compression fractures (thoracolumbar fractures) based on osteoporosis. Severe structural damage to the spine and pelvis can destroy the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis, and for the spinal and pelvic sagittal imbalance caused by the above reasons, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is used to re-establish the balance between the different sides of the vertebra. Especially the balance relationship in sagittal position is widely used in clinic at present. The purpose of this study was to compare the spinal and pelvic sagittal balance parameters and relevant scale values before and after PVP operation. To investigate the effect of sagittal balance reconstruction on the functional recovery of patients after PVP methods 52 cases (12 males) from April 2014 to November 2015 in Department of Spinal Orthopaedics, first affiliated Hospital of Southern Anhui Medical College, were analyzed retrospectively. 40 women, with an average age of 68.25 years, Age range 58 years and 85 years before and after PVP operation in patients with anterior cervical kyphoid angle, thoracic kyphoid angle TKN, lumbar spine anterior kyphoid angle, spinal sagittal balance sagittal balance, pelvic angle of incidence, pelvic obliquity angle, sacral obliquity angle, JOA score of lower back pain, and Oswestry loin and lower extremity score. The changes of VAS pain score were different in 52 cases. Results all the 52 patients were successfully operated, no operative or perioperative death occurred, and the follow-up time was 1 ~ 6 months. The mean time was 4.5 months. Preoperative CL9.212 擄鹵30.499 擄TK41.385 擄鹵27.957 擄LL59.135 擄鹵36.367 擄SVA20.692mm 鹵85.861mm PI71.614 擄鹵35.303 擄PT30.635 擄鹵19.811 擄SS54.700 擄鹵31.944 擄JOA score 8.385 鹵2.162Oswestry score 34.808 鹵3.042VAS 6.808 鹵0.971.The postoperative CL9.077 擄鹵16.384 擄TK24.635 擄鹵13.233 擄LL42.865 擄鹵8.765 擄SVA-20.96mm 鹵47.739mm P38.173 鹵7.326 擄TOA score before and after operation were compared with the score of 34.808 鹵3.042VAS (6.808 鹵0.971L) and the postoperative CL9.077 擄鹵16.384 擄TK24.635 擄鹵13.233 擄LL42.865 擄鹵8.765 擄SVA-20.96mm 鹵47.739mm 鹵47.39mm P38.173 鹵7.326 擄TOA score before and after operation. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the parameters of postoperative TKL, SVA, Pi, PTSS and before operation, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05 VAS score, JOA score, ODI score and preoperative comparison), and there was no significant difference between before and after operation. There was a significant correlation between P0.05, Pi and PT. Conclusion the balance of spine includes horizontal balance, coronal balance and sagittal balance. Due to the existence of physiological curvature of the human spine, the sagittal balance of the spine plays an extremely important role in maintaining the normal posture of the human body. Structural damage and destruction on either side will result in a series of related changes in the sagittal position parameters of the spine, which are closely related to each other. Using percutaneous vertebroplasty to reconstruct the balance of spine and pelvis can obtain good clinical effect, not only for the related parameters to return to normal or close to normal. It also showed that the improvement of correlative assessment scale and the reconstruction of the sagittal position parameters of spine and pelvis after PVP had an important role in promoting the recovery and the improvement of quality of life after PVP. Clinicians should pay more attention to the clinical application of spinal-pelvic sagittal parameter evaluation system.
【學位授予單位】：皖南醫(yī)學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R687.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 吳新元;任宏業(yè);;上承式無推力拱形橋梁結構體系分析和比較[J];城市道橋與防洪;2015年08期

2 尹剛輝;金大地;陳方堯;陳克冰;張忠民;黎慶初;;新的脊柱-骨盆矢狀面測量參數:骶骨骨盆角的提出及意義[J];中國脊柱脊髓雜志;2014年08期

3 龔朱;楊愛華;趙惠康;;外科手術機器人發(fā)展及其應用[J];中國醫(yī)學教育技術;2014年03期

4 趙勇;方維;閆安;王鋼;劉春雨;;肩胛肌筋膜炎軟組織張力與頸椎生理曲度改變相關性探討[J];中國骨傷;2014年05期

5 李亮;姜保恩;馬曉春;于學忠;隋海濤;;矢狀面平衡參數在低度峽部裂腰椎滑脫患者脊柱-骨盆矢狀位平衡中的意義[J];頸腰痛雜志;2014年02期

6 韓露;張磊;張會久;;椎體成形術和椎體后凸成形術治療脊柱胸腰段骨質疏松性椎體壓縮骨折的臨床體會[J];中國醫(yī)學工程;2013年01期

7 姜歡暢;王吉興;陳建庭;江建明;魯凱伍;瞿東濱;張繼業(yè);金大地;;退變性腰椎滑脫后路融合術后的遠期療效分析[J];中國矯形外科雜志;2011年05期

8 程少丹;莫文;施杞;鄔學群;王擁軍;;PVP治療椎體壓縮性骨折[J];中國骨質疏松雜志;2007年12期

9 范順武;方向前;張宏軍;胡月正;;椎間隙撐開在腰椎滑脫癥復位和融合中的應用價值[J];中華骨科雜志;2006年02期

10 杜志江,孫立寧,富歷新;外科手術機器人技術發(fā)展現狀及關鍵技術分析[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學學報;2003年07期

，

本文編號：1614640