本文關(guān)鍵詞： 肩袖分層撕裂 縫線橋 分層修復(fù) 全層修復(fù)　出處：《中國修復(fù)重建外科雜志》2017年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的評價關(guān)節(jié)鏡下縫線橋分層修復(fù)術(shù)治療肩袖分層撕裂的臨床療效。方法將2013年5月—2015年5月符合選擇標準的54例肩袖分層撕裂患者納入研究,隨機分為兩組,試驗組28例行關(guān)節(jié)鏡下縫線橋分層縫合修復(fù),對照組26例行關(guān)節(jié)鏡下縫線橋全層縫合修復(fù)。兩組患者性別、年齡、側(cè)別、撕裂類型以及術(shù)前疼痛視覺模擬評分(VAS)、肩關(guān)節(jié)Constant評分、美國肩肘外科協(xié)會評分(ASES)、美國加州大學(xué)洛杉磯分校(UCLA)評分、肩關(guān)節(jié)前屈活動度、體側(cè)外旋活動度比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。術(shù)后隨訪并比較兩組肩關(guān)節(jié)功能評分、活動度及肩袖再撕裂發(fā)生情況。結(jié)果試驗組手術(shù)時間較對照組延長,比較差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(t=8.383,P=0.000)。術(shù)后兩組切口均Ⅰ期愈合,無手術(shù)相關(guān)并發(fā)癥發(fā)生。患者均獲隨訪12個月,兩組術(shù)后12個月時UCLA、ASES、VAS、Constant評分及肩關(guān)節(jié)前屈、外旋活動度與術(shù)前比較,差異均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05);兩組間以上指標比較,差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。術(shù)后12個月,試驗組4例(14.3%)、對照組5例(19.2%)患者發(fā)生肩袖再撕裂,發(fā)生率比較差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(χ~2=0.237,P=0.626)。結(jié)論關(guān)節(jié)鏡下縫線橋分層修復(fù)術(shù)治療肩袖分層撕裂,在肩關(guān)節(jié)功能評分、肩關(guān)節(jié)活動度及術(shù)后再撕裂方面與傳統(tǒng)縫線橋全層固定術(shù)比較無明顯差異,而且手術(shù)時間較長。
[Abstract]:Objective to evaluate the clinical effect of arthroscopic suture bridge laminar repair in the treatment of rotator cuff delamination tear. Methods from May 2013 to May 2015, 54 patients with rotator cuff delamination tear were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups. 28 patients in the test group were treated with arthroscopic suture bridge suture repair, and 26 patients in the control group were treated with arthroscopic suture bridge suture repair. Sex, age, side type, tear type and preoperative pain visual analogue score (VASA), shoulder joint Constant score were used in the two groups. The American Society of shoulder and Elbow surgery score (ASESA), UCLAs (UCLAs), shoulder flexion and lateral lateral rotation were not significantly different. All the patients were followed up after operation and compared with the two groups in terms of shoulder joint function. Results the operative time in the experimental group was longer than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. The incisions of the two groups were healed in the first stage and no complications occurred. The patients were followed up for 12 months. At 12 months after operation, the UCLA ASESV constant score, shoulder anterior flexion and external rotation were significantly different from those before operation (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the above indexes (P 0.05), 12 months after operation, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months after operation, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months after operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of rotator cuff retear in 4 patients in the trial group and in 5 patients in the control group (蠂 ~ 2 + 0.237). Conclusion the arthroscopic suture bridge repair is used to treat the rotator cuff delamination tear, and the function of shoulder joint is evaluated. There was no significant difference in range of motion of shoulder joint and postoperative tear compared with traditional suture bridge full layer fixation, and the operative time was longer.
【作者單位】： 承德醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬醫(yī)院關(guān)節(jié)外科;
【基金】：2017年度河北省醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)研究重點課題計劃(20170233)~~
【分類號】：R687.4

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃公怡,王曉濱;肩袖的生物學(xué)特性與肩袖損傷修復(fù)[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué)(骨科學(xué)分冊);2002年04期

2 左建林;于慶巍;劉鵬;王文軍;高忠禮;佐野博高;井通榮二;;肩袖斷裂后肩袖肌群羽狀角的變化[J];吉林大學(xué)學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2010年03期

3 高大柱,胡大勇;肩袖鈣化17例臨床報告[J];安徽中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;1997年05期

4 朱慶生;肩袖疾病的病因、病理及研究現(xiàn)狀[J];中國創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志;2001年03期

5 肖健;崔國慶;王健全;;肩袖部分撕裂的診斷和治療[J];中國微創(chuàng)外科雜志;2006年02期

6 韓寧;孫貴新;;肩袖全層撕裂的治療選擇[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2010年05期

7 卓寶玉;手術(shù)修補肩袖斷裂38例報告[J];骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;1996年03期

8 萬子余;肩袖病的診斷、病理生理及治療進展[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué)(物理醫(yī)學(xué)與康復(fù)學(xué)分冊);1996年01期

9 周琳;鄭昱新;王海生;顧新豐;;AAOS《肩袖疾病臨床實踐指南(2010年)》解讀[J];國際骨科學(xué)雜志;2013年01期

10 張一，

本文編號：1514356