血液凈化治療患者血管通路使用情況分析
[Abstract]:The purpose of the study on the use of vascular access in a maintenance hemodialysis patient is to identify the first and present use of vascular access in our central hemodialysis patients and the factors affecting them. Method: The maintenance hemodialysis patients were included in the study from July 2015 to December 2015. The data collected from this central dialysis patient's registry, the Haitai electronic database, the hemodialysis record sheet, and the questionnaire. The data collected included age, sex, baseline data from the beginning to the hemodialysis, the original onset, the dialysis age, and the comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and the like. No polyester jacket catheter and catheter with cuff catheter with tunnel, retention time, complication, etc. Autologous or grafted arteriovenous contraindications, including the establishment site, the mature time, the service life and the complications, etc. In addition, the change of the vascular access and the results of the patient's laboratory tests were collected. Results: There were 294 patients,189 (64.3%),105 (35.7%), 53.2-15.1 (15-87), and 6.2 (0.3-32) years. The primary glomerular nephritis is the main disease. In the first time,56 cases (19.0%) and 235 cases (79.9%) of the vascular access were treated. The primary reason for the first hemodialysis not to be used was: the diagnosis of uremia was 55.9% at the time of the visit, and no one was informed of 23.0%. In the present, 91.8% of the vascular access and the Cuff catheter with the tunnel account for 6.12%. In patients with age over 65 years of age, the rate of use of vascular access was reduced and the rate of catheter usage increased. In patients with dialysis age less than 2 years, the use rate of Cuff catheter with tunnel was the highest, and the vascular access of over 20 years of dialysis was the inside of the artery and vein. There were mainly internal jugular vein and internal jugular vein, and the incidence of infection was low, 1.09/1000 catheter days and 2.03/1000 catheter days, respectively. The main part of the internal jugular vein of the vein was mainly the left inferior artery-head vein (75.4%), and the first-choice end-end anastomosis. There was no significant difference in sex, age, operation site, blood flow and internal life of the first time before and after the first dialysis. The early complications of the early complications of the AVMs are the postoperative thrombosis, and the late complications mainly include internal occlusion, aneurysm-like expansion or aneurysm formation, insufficient blood flow, and limb edema. After the balloon was expanded and the stent was placed, the vessel was recanalized and the edema of the limb disappeared. The use of the graft and arterio-venous system was low, with only one patient. Conclusion: Through the cross-sectional investigation, the first hemodialysis vascular access in our center is dominated by the non-polyester sleeve catheter, and the current vascular access is mainly in the vein of the vein. The catheter insertion site was mainly internal jugular vein, and the incidence of infection was lower. The site of the vein of the arteriovenous is the main artery-head vein of the left side, and the preferred end is in good agreement. The early complications of the early complications of the arteriovenous malformation are the postoperative thrombosis, and the late complications mainly include internal occlusion, aneurysm-like expansion or aneurysm formation, insufficient blood flow, and limb edema. Unfortunately, in our central hemodialysis patients, the use of graft and vein is less, and is not yet available. Objective: To study the vascular access and complications of continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with continuous renal replacement therapy. Method: From April 2014 to October 2014, the data of the continuous renal replacement therapy in this center was collected, including the demographic data, the original incidence, the department, the blood pressure, the heart rate, the SOFA score, the APACHE II score, the presence or absence of the immunosuppressants, the presence or absence of mechanical ventilation, The method of continuous renal replacement therapy, the selection of the vascular access, the location of the catheter in the non-polyester sleeve catheter, the time of the catheter insertion, the blood flow, the presence or absence of the catheter, the location of the re-insertion, the time of the catheter after the re-placement, the catheter care, the cumulative time of use of the catheter, Catheter function loss of work and catheter infection, etc. In addition, that change of the vascular access of the patient and the result of laboratory examination were also collected. Results:292 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. Of these,175 males (59.9%),117 females (40.1%), and 50.8 to 18.6 years (12 to 94 years). The patients with CRRT were AKI, MODS and SIRS. Vascular access:280 patients had the choice of PET-free catheter, the proportion was 95.9%, and 11 patients used AVMs for 3.77%, and one patient used long-term polyester sleeve with tunnel. There were mainly right internal jugular vein (54.3%) and right femoral vein (30.7%) and left femoral vein (13.2%). in that case of the internal medicine department and the emergency department, the catheter site is mainly the right internal jugular vein, and the surgical patient is mainly the right and left femoral veins; in addition, the CRRT method and the continuous vein venous hemofiltration patient are mainly provided with a femoral vein, The right internal jugular vein was the main.32 patients (11.4%) had to be re-inserted in the treatment of CRRT, with a total of 51 times, an average of 1.59 and 0.98 times, and the maximum number of re-insertion times was 4 times. The reason of the re-insertion is the function of the infection and the function of the catheter; the site of the re-insertion is the main (52.9%) of the left femoral vein, and the re-insertion site only accounts for 21.6% of the same person as the first place of the catheter. The function of the catheter was lost, accounting for 7.14% of all the patients, accounting for 11.8% of the total number of the tubes, the median time of the function of the catheter was 5 days, the mean time of use was 8.95 days, the reason was that the thrombus in the catheter (17.9%) and the blood flow of the catheter were not sufficient (82.1%). The main risk factors of the multi-factor analysis of the function loss of the catheter were the cumulative time of CRRT and the level of Hb. In addition, the mean time of catheter infection was 10.7 days after the placement of the tube, the incidence of catheter infection was 7.19/1000 catheter days, the incidence of catheter infection was higher than that of the internal jugular vein, and the surgical patient was higher than that of the medical patient. The main factors that affect the catheter infection are the cumulative use time of the catheter and the serum ALB level. Conclusion: Through the cross-sectional investigation, we find that the vascular access of the central CRRT is the main choice of the non-polyester-free catheter, and the site of the catheter is the right internal jugular vein, and some patients need to be re-inserted. The main risk factors of the function failure of the catheter are the CRRT accumulation time and the blood Hb level. The mean time for catheter infection was 10.7 days after placement and the incidence of catheter infection was 7.19/1000 catheter days. The main factors that affect the catheter infection are the cumulative use time of the catheter and the serum ALB level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號(hào)】:R692.5
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳侶林,徐秀蓉,周妤,郝惠文,劉俊,賈麗娟;急診血液透析不同血管通路的對(duì)比分析[J];中國(guó)廠礦醫(yī)學(xué);2005年03期
2 葉朝陽(yáng);;血管通路的功能評(píng)估[J];中國(guó)血液凈化;2007年07期
3 袁偉杰;;應(yīng)關(guān)注血管通路遠(yuǎn)期并發(fā)癥及其處理[J];中國(guó)血液凈化;2009年06期
4 蘇白海;付平;;充分認(rèn)識(shí)和面對(duì)建立永久性血管通路所面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];中國(guó)血液凈化;2009年07期
5 何雪花;;化療患者血管通路的護(hù)理管理[J];中國(guó)民間療法;2010年06期
6 李鳳君;足背動(dòng)脈在暫時(shí)性血管通路中的應(yīng)用[J];張家口醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期
7 龐慧華,錢(qián)家麒,張慶怡,黃佩文,張紀(jì)蔚,張皓;血透中永久性血管通路的功能監(jiān)測(cè)[J];上海第二醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期
8 王笑云;;要重視透析血管通路創(chuàng)建維護(hù)和并發(fā)癥的防治[J];中國(guó)血液凈化;2007年07期
9 孫曉萌;劉宏;劉必成;;血管通路感染的診治進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)血液凈化;2013年06期
10 黃建業(yè),高賀通,姜建芳;化療用血管通路裝置在臨床中的應(yīng)用與護(hù)理[J];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1999年11期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 葉朝陽(yáng);;血管通路的功能評(píng)估[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)腎臟學(xué)分會(huì)2004年年會(huì)暨第二屆全國(guó)中青年腎臟病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議專題講座匯編[C];2004年
2 葉朝陽(yáng);華參;;血管通路的功能監(jiān)測(cè)[A];中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)腎臟病學(xué)分會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)專題講座[C];2006年
3 王笑云;;慢性血管通路選擇和并發(fā)癥防治[A];血液透析進(jìn)展學(xué)習(xí)班講義[C];2006年
4 馮玉珍;李采瓊;周婧;;維持性血液透析患者血管通路的并發(fā)癥及護(hù)理[A];全國(guó)內(nèi)科護(hù)理學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)議、全國(guó)心臟內(nèi)、外科護(hù)理學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)議、第9屆全國(guó)糖尿病護(hù)理學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)議、第9屆全國(guó)血液凈化護(hù)理學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2011年
5 Janet Pettit;;兒科&新生兒最佳血管通路選擇[A];全國(guó)兒科護(hù)理學(xué)術(shù)交流會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2012年
6 徐秋蘭;;血脂凈化治療中建立兩種血管通路的體會(huì)[A];第一屆全國(guó)疑難重型肝病大會(huì)、第四屆全國(guó)人工肝及血液凈化學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2008年
7 陳麗云;施素華;梁萌;許樹(shù)根;;兩種血管穿刺法對(duì)透析血管通路狹窄發(fā)生率的影響[A];第十一屆全國(guó)中西醫(yī)結(jié)合腎臟病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文匯編[C];2010年
8 張玉強(qiáng);陳順杰;徐成剛;葉朝陽(yáng);趙學(xué)智;;維持性血液透析患者疑難血管通路的選擇和應(yīng)用經(jīng)驗(yàn)[A];“中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)腎臟病學(xué)分會(huì)2004年年會(huì)”暨“第二屆全國(guó)中青年腎臟病學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議”論文匯編[C];2004年
9 吳紅艷;張樂(lè);艾方;范志萍;李霞;;血液凈化者血管通路的管理[A];中華醫(yī)院管理學(xué)會(huì)血液凈化中心管理分會(huì)2004年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2004年
10 梅長(zhǎng)林;;血管通路的選擇及并發(fā)癥防治[A];貴州省醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)腎臟病學(xué)分會(huì)2008年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文匯編[C];2008年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 付東紅 管九蘋(píng);北京大學(xué)臨床腫瘤學(xué)院血管通路中心成立[N];中國(guó)醫(yī)藥報(bào);2010年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 任紅旗;血液凈化治療患者血管通路使用情況分析[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2016年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 李劍瑩;維持性血液透析患者血管通路現(xiàn)狀及影響因素分析[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年
2 楊艷麗;維持性血液透析患者血管通路建立和應(yīng)用情況的臨床調(diào)查研究[D];河北醫(yī)科大學(xué);2011年
3 張穎秋;維持性血透患者血管通路再循環(huán)測(cè)定方法的對(duì)比研究[D];第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué);2004年
4 丁燕平;兩種血管通路血液透析患者住院率及生存情況的比較[D];廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號(hào):2508688
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mjlw/2508688.html