天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當前位置:主頁 > 醫(yī)學論文 > 泌尿論文 >

980nm半導體紅激光前列腺汽化術與經尿道前列腺電切術治療良性前列腺增生的臨床療效比較

發(fā)布時間:2019-03-01 17:10
【摘要】:目的本研究主要是總結980nm半導體紅激光前列腺汽化術在治療良性前列腺增生(Benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH)方面的臨床療效及手術情況,并與經尿道電切術(Transurethral prostatic resection, TURP)進行綜合分析比較,探討980nm半導體紅激光前列腺汽化術治療BPH的安全性及療效,為今后980nm半導體紅激光在BPH方面的臨床應用提供科學依據(jù)。 方法采集自2012年4月至2013年4月期間在河北聯(lián)合大學附屬醫(yī)院泌尿外科住院并接受980nm半導體紅激光治療或TURP治療的BPH患者,,隨機分成兩組,其中87例接受980nm半導體紅激光前列腺汽化術,81例接受TURP治療。觀察記錄兩組患者的手術時間、術中出血量、術后并發(fā)癥,術前及術后分別進行國際前列腺癥狀評分(IPSS)、生活質量指數(shù)評分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、殘余尿量(PVR)等指標的差異有無統(tǒng)計學意義,并進行綜合分析比較。 結果兩組患者的年齡、病程、前列腺體積、PVR、Qmax、IPSS、QOL、血鈉值、血紅蛋白值等術前情況進行比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P>0.05);980nm激光組手術時間大于TURP組,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05);980nm激光組術中失血量、術后膀胱沖洗時間、留置尿管時間以及術后住院時間均明顯少于TURP組,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.01);980nm激光組術后繼發(fā)出血、TURS綜合癥少于TURP組,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.05);與術前癥狀相比較,兩組患者術后較術前有顯著差異,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P<0.01);兩組患者術后療效比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義(P>0.05),說明兩組患者術后療效相同。 結論980nm半導體紅激光前列腺汽化術能明顯改善患者的下尿路梗阻癥狀,具有與TURP相同的近期療效,與TURP相比,具有手術操作簡單、術中出血少、術后留置尿管時間及住院時間短、術后恢復快等優(yōu)點,是一種治療BPH安全有效的微創(chuàng)手術方式。
[Abstract]:Objective the purpose of this study was to summarize the clinical efficacy and surgical results of 980nm semiconductor red laser vaporization of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (Benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH) and to compare it with transurethral resection of the prostate (Transurethral prostatic resection, TURP). To investigate the safety and efficacy of 980nm semiconductor red laser vaporization of prostate in the treatment of BPH, and to provide scientific basis for the clinical application of 980nm semiconductor red laser in BPH in the future. Methods from April 2012 to April 2013, BPH patients who were hospitalized in urological department of affiliated Hospital of Hebei Union University and received 980nm semiconductor red laser therapy or TURP treatment were randomly divided into two groups. Among them 87 cases were treated with 980nm semiconductor red laser vaporization of prostate and 81 cases were treated with TURP. The time of operation, the amount of bleeding during operation, the postoperative complications, the (IPSS), quality of life index (QOL),) and the (Qmax), (International Prostate symptom score) before and after operation were observed and recorded in the two groups. The difference of residual urine volume (PVR) and other indexes was statistically significant, and comprehensive analysis and comparison were carried out. Results there was no significant difference between the two groups in age, course of disease, prostate volume, serum sodium level of PVR,Qmax,IPSS,QOL, and hemoglobin value before operation (P > 0. 05), but no significant difference was found between the two groups (P > 0. 05). The operation time of 980nm laser group was longer than that of TURP group (P < 0 05). The blood loss, bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time and postoperative hospitalization time in 980nm laser group were significantly lower than those in TURP group (P < 0 01). TURS syndrome in 980nm laser group was significantly lower than that in TURP group (P < 0 05), and there was significant difference between the two groups in postoperative symptoms (P < 0 01), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P < 0 05). There was no significant difference in postoperative curative effect between the two groups (P > 0.05), indicating that the two groups had the same postoperative curative effect. Conclusion 980nm semiconductor red laser vaporization of prostate can significantly improve the symptoms of lower urinary tract obstruction, and has the same short-term curative effect as TURP. Compared with TURP, it has simple operation and less bleeding during operation. It is a safe and effective minimally invasive operation for BPH due to its short time of indwelling catheter, short hospitalization time and quick recovery after operation.
【學位授予單位】:河北聯(lián)合大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:R699.8

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 盛旭俊;陳建華;王偉明;孔良;張良;虞永江;鄔喻;齊雋;;經尿道等離子雙極電刀前列腺剜除術治療良性前列腺增生[J];中華男科學雜志;2011年05期

2 王蕊紅;寧建紅;;經尿道前列腺切除術后膀胱沖洗液溫度研究[J];齊魯護理雜志;2007年02期

3 王琳;張正良;;散射光法檢測血紅蛋白量的可靠性[J];實用醫(yī)技雜志;2010年04期

4 王行環(huán),王懷鵬,陳浩陽,劉久敏,羅耀雄,馮自衛(wèi),羅則民;經尿道等離子體雙極電切術治療良性前列腺增生及膀胱腫瘤[J];中華泌尿外科雜志;2003年05期

5 徐軍;李會寧;屈栗明;;經尿道前列腺電切術后尿道狹窄的原因及防治[J];中國微創(chuàng)外科雜志;2009年09期

6 宋國祥,周益龍,張道習;經尿道前列腺電汽化術后出血原因分析[J];中國誤診學雜志;2002年02期

7 李燕;;良性前列腺增生的用藥進展[J];科技創(chuàng)新導報;2010年21期



本文編號:2432630

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mjlw/2432630.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網All Rights Reserved | 網站地圖 |

版權申明:資料由用戶fa2d1***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com