關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因與靜脈麻醉在急性肩關(guān)節(jié)前脫位中的應(yīng)用-Meta分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-12 21:10
【摘要】：背景：肩關(guān)節(jié)脫位占全身關(guān)節(jié)脫位的40%以上,是骨科急診最常見的疾病之一。其社區(qū)發(fā)病率為每年每十萬人口中發(fā)生11.2例。雖然早在2000年前,醫(yī)學(xué)之父希波克拉底便詳細(xì)描述了肩關(guān)節(jié)的解剖以及脫位類型和閉合復(fù)位的方法。迄今為止,人們對于如何治療外傷性肩關(guān)節(jié)脫位仍缺乏共識(shí)。調(diào)查研究顯示,國內(nèi)大多數(shù)醫(yī)生認(rèn)為在進(jìn)行手法復(fù)位時(shí)需要采取合適的麻醉方式,且選擇最多的3種麻醉方式依次為：①臂叢神經(jīng)阻滯；②靜脈麻醉；③關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因麻醉法。臂叢神經(jīng)阻滯位點(diǎn)周圍解剖結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)雜,操作難度較高且并發(fā)癥多見。因此,靜脈麻醉成為了國外醫(yī)生在肩關(guān)節(jié)脫位手法復(fù)位麻醉方式中的首選。然而,近年來關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因的麻醉方式以其操作簡單,并發(fā)癥少,治療費(fèi)用低等優(yōu)勢逐漸走進(jìn)了人們的研究視野。雖然國外開展了大量關(guān)于靜脈麻醉與關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因麻醉法的隨機(jī)對照試驗(yàn)。然而對于其確切療效,結(jié)果仍存在部分爭議。 目的：本研究將通過Meta分析的方式,對國內(nèi)外有關(guān)靜脈麻醉以及關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因麻醉方式的臨床研究展開深入的整合分析。針對兩種麻醉方式各自的優(yōu)勢,結(jié)合高質(zhì)量的隨機(jī)對照試驗(yàn)研究,試圖得到關(guān)于兩者在肩關(guān)節(jié)脫位手法復(fù)位中應(yīng)用價(jià)值的更為強(qiáng)有力的證據(jù),為臨床治療決策提供幫助。 方法：計(jì)算機(jī)檢索MEDLINE(1950至2013),EMBASE(1980至2013)及CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,最新版),以"shoulder dislocation, lidocaine or lignocaine, intra-articular"為英文檢索詞,結(jié)合Cochrane協(xié)作網(wǎng)推薦使用的針對MEDLINE隨機(jī)對照試驗(yàn)的高敏感性檢索策略進(jìn)行檢索。根據(jù)文章題名及摘要進(jìn)行初篩,對符合要求的文獻(xiàn)獲取全文進(jìn)一步篩查。質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)采用Cochrane協(xié)作網(wǎng)推薦的偏倚風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)工具,納入文獻(xiàn)的質(zhì)量越高,Meta分析的結(jié)果可信度越高。根據(jù)所納入文獻(xiàn)的異質(zhì)性高低選擇使用固定效應(yīng)模型或隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型分析數(shù)據(jù)。本研究使用的軟件為Ravman5.2版本。 結(jié)果：經(jīng)過對1539篇文章進(jìn)行初篩后,我們對剩下的11篇文章進(jìn)行了全文篩選.最后排除4篇文獻(xiàn),納入7篇隨機(jī)對照試驗(yàn).總共有317名患者符合納入條件。關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因組在復(fù)位成功率、復(fù)位中患者的主觀疼痛體驗(yàn)以及復(fù)位3-4次后的成功率上與靜脈麻醉組均無明顯差異。而在并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率以及院內(nèi)治療時(shí)間上,關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因麻醉組明顯優(yōu)于靜脈麻醉組。且在復(fù)位1-2次后的成功率這個(gè)指標(biāo)上關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因組也表現(xiàn)出了明顯的優(yōu)勢。 結(jié)論：關(guān)節(jié)腔內(nèi)注射利多卡因麻醉法在復(fù)位療效以及疼痛控制上與靜脈麻醉相當(dāng),但其并發(fā)癥更少,費(fèi)用更低,需要的治療時(shí)間更短。
[Abstract]:Background: shoulder dislocation, which accounts for more than 40% of the total dislocation, is one of the most common diseases in orthopedic department. The community incidence rate is 11.2 per 100,000 population per year. Although Hippocrates, the father of medicine, described in detail the anatomy of the shoulder joint, the type of dislocation and the method of closed reduction as early as 2000 years ago. So far, there is still a lack of consensus on how to treat traumatic dislocation of the shoulder. The investigation shows that most doctors in China think that the appropriate anesthesia should be adopted when performing manual reduction, and the three most selected anesthesia methods are as follows: (1) brachial plexus block; (2) intravenous anesthesia; 3 intraarticular injection of lidocaine. The anatomic structure around the block site of brachial plexus is complex, the operation is difficult and the complications are common. Therefore, intravenous anesthesia has become the first choice for foreign doctors in manual reduction anesthesia of shoulder dislocation. However, in recent years, the intraarticular injection of lidocaine has gradually come into the research field because of its advantages of simple operation, less complications and low treatment cost. A large number of randomized controlled trials of intravenous anesthesia and intraarticular lidocaine anesthesia have been conducted abroad. However, there are still some controversies about the exact effect. Objective: to analyze the clinical study of intravenous anesthesia and intraarticular lidocaine by Meta analysis. According to the advantages of the two anaesthesia methods, combined with a high quality randomized controlled trial, we try to obtain more powerful evidence about the application value of the two methods in the manual reduction of shoulder dislocation, so as to provide help for the clinical treatment decision. Methods: MEDLINE (from 1950 to 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2013) and the latest edition of CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched by computer. "shoulder dislocation, lidocaine or lignocaine, intra-articular" was used as the key word in English. A highly sensitive search strategy for MEDLINE randomized controlled trials recommended by Cochrane Cooperative Network is used. According to the title and abstract of the article, the full text of the document obtained in accordance with the requirements was screened further. The bias risk assessment tool recommended by Cochrane Cooperative Network was used in the quality evaluation. The higher the quality of the literature included, the higher the reliability of the results of the Meta analysis. A fixed effect model or a random effect model is used to analyze the data according to the heterogeneity of the literature involved. The software used in this study is Ravman5.2 version. Results: after screening 1539 articles, we screened the remaining 11 articles. Finally, 4 articles were excluded and 7 randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 317 patients were eligible for inclusion. There was no significant difference in the success rate of reduction, the experience of subjective pain and the success rate after 3-4 times of reduction between the group of intraarticular injection of lidocaine and the group of intravenous anesthesia. In the incidence of complications and hospital treatment time, intraarticular injection of lidocaine anesthesia group was significantly better than intravenous anesthesia group. The success rate of the upper articular injection of lidocaine also showed obvious advantages after 1-2 times reduction. Conclusion: intraarticular lidocaine anesthesia is comparable to intravenous anesthesia in terms of reduction efficacy and pain control, but it has fewer complications, lower cost and shorter treatment time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：R684.7;R614
本文編號(hào)：2375251
[Abstract]:Background: shoulder dislocation, which accounts for more than 40% of the total dislocation, is one of the most common diseases in orthopedic department. The community incidence rate is 11.2 per 100,000 population per year. Although Hippocrates, the father of medicine, described in detail the anatomy of the shoulder joint, the type of dislocation and the method of closed reduction as early as 2000 years ago. So far, there is still a lack of consensus on how to treat traumatic dislocation of the shoulder. The investigation shows that most doctors in China think that the appropriate anesthesia should be adopted when performing manual reduction, and the three most selected anesthesia methods are as follows: (1) brachial plexus block; (2) intravenous anesthesia; 3 intraarticular injection of lidocaine. The anatomic structure around the block site of brachial plexus is complex, the operation is difficult and the complications are common. Therefore, intravenous anesthesia has become the first choice for foreign doctors in manual reduction anesthesia of shoulder dislocation. However, in recent years, the intraarticular injection of lidocaine has gradually come into the research field because of its advantages of simple operation, less complications and low treatment cost. A large number of randomized controlled trials of intravenous anesthesia and intraarticular lidocaine anesthesia have been conducted abroad. However, there are still some controversies about the exact effect. Objective: to analyze the clinical study of intravenous anesthesia and intraarticular lidocaine by Meta analysis. According to the advantages of the two anaesthesia methods, combined with a high quality randomized controlled trial, we try to obtain more powerful evidence about the application value of the two methods in the manual reduction of shoulder dislocation, so as to provide help for the clinical treatment decision. Methods: MEDLINE (from 1950 to 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2013) and the latest edition of CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched by computer. "shoulder dislocation, lidocaine or lignocaine, intra-articular" was used as the key word in English. A highly sensitive search strategy for MEDLINE randomized controlled trials recommended by Cochrane Cooperative Network is used. According to the title and abstract of the article, the full text of the document obtained in accordance with the requirements was screened further. The bias risk assessment tool recommended by Cochrane Cooperative Network was used in the quality evaluation. The higher the quality of the literature included, the higher the reliability of the results of the Meta analysis. A fixed effect model or a random effect model is used to analyze the data according to the heterogeneity of the literature involved. The software used in this study is Ravman5.2 version. Results: after screening 1539 articles, we screened the remaining 11 articles. Finally, 4 articles were excluded and 7 randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 317 patients were eligible for inclusion. There was no significant difference in the success rate of reduction, the experience of subjective pain and the success rate after 3-4 times of reduction between the group of intraarticular injection of lidocaine and the group of intravenous anesthesia. In the incidence of complications and hospital treatment time, intraarticular injection of lidocaine anesthesia group was significantly better than intravenous anesthesia group. The success rate of the upper articular injection of lidocaine also showed obvious advantages after 1-2 times reduction. Conclusion: intraarticular lidocaine anesthesia is comparable to intravenous anesthesia in terms of reduction efficacy and pain control, but it has fewer complications, lower cost and shorter treatment time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：R684.7;R614
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 陳勁松,范猛,韓慶強(qiáng),王群;Sitmson法在成人肩關(guān)節(jié)脫位中的應(yīng)用及機(jī)理探討[J];骨與關(guān)節(jié)損傷雜志;2003年11期
2 汪新媛;田京;;骨肉瘤化療研究進(jìn)展[J];國際骨科學(xué)雜志;2010年03期
3 曹劍;魯開智;陶國才;崔劍;;神經(jīng)刺激器定位下肌間溝臂叢神經(jīng)阻滯誤入硬膜外腔一例[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;2005年11期
4 牟虹;王光輝;殷雁斌;;臂叢頸叢聯(lián)合神經(jīng)阻滯用于鎖骨骨折內(nèi)固定術(shù)的臨床觀察[J];實(shí)用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2007年20期
5 吳曉明;高偉;李凡;桑偉林;王秋根;;肩關(guān)節(jié)前脫位治療的臨床調(diào)查[J];上海醫(yī)學(xué);2012年11期
6 王勇;;肩關(guān)節(jié)脫位的復(fù)位手法分析[J];中外醫(yī)學(xué)研究;2013年23期
7 Markus Regauer;Hans Polzer;Wolf Mutschler;;Neurovascular complications due to the Hippocrates method for reducing anterior shoulder dislocations[J];World Journal of Orthopedics;2014年01期
，本文編號(hào)：2375251
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/2375251.html
最近更新
教材專著
