本文選題：長(zhǎng)托寧 + 腰硬聯(lián)合麻醉�。� 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：目的：探討長(zhǎng)托寧預(yù)先給藥防治腰硬聯(lián)合麻醉后寒戰(zhàn)的有效率，，以及患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)變化及鎮(zhèn)靜效果。 方法：將80例擇期行全子宮切除手術(shù)患者的ASAI~II級(jí)、年齡45~60歲,體重50~70kg，身高155~165cm,BMI18~25kg/m2的病人隨機(jī)分為兩組：A組（長(zhǎng)托寧組)、B組（空白對(duì)照組）。于麻醉開(kāi)始前5min，A組靜脈注射長(zhǎng)托寧0.01mg/kg(用生理鹽水稀釋到2ml)，B組靜脈注射相同體積的生理鹽水。患者采取右側(cè)臥位，于L2-3間隙穿刺進(jìn)入蛛網(wǎng)膜下間隙后，勻速推注0.75%的布比卡因2.0ml（10-20sec內(nèi)），置入導(dǎo)管于硬膜外間隙。固定導(dǎo)管后患者改為平臥位，用體位法調(diào)整阻滯平面在T6以下。術(shù)中根據(jù)腰麻作用減退情況酌情經(jīng)硬膜外導(dǎo)管追加利多卡因3～5ml。術(shù)中連續(xù)監(jiān)測(cè)ECG、NIBP，并記錄入室（T1）、切皮（T2）、牽拉腹膜(T3)、探查盆腹腔(T4)、牽拉子宮(T5)、關(guān)腹(T6)、手術(shù)結(jié)束(T7)時(shí)的心率（HR）及平均動(dòng)脈壓（MAP）�；颊呷胧視r(shí)的HR及MAP采用患者在手術(shù)床上靜臥10分鐘后的HR及MAP。觀察寒戰(zhàn)發(fā)生率。觀察并記錄試驗(yàn)對(duì)象的鎮(zhèn)靜評(píng)分（Ramsay評(píng)分）。結(jié)果：（1）兩組病人的一般情況，兩組患者的ASA分級(jí)、年齡、體重，輸液量，出血量，尿量，沖洗量和手術(shù)時(shí)間的差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）。（2）兩組患者麻醉后，MAP均有所下降，與入室時(shí)相比有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05），手術(shù)快結(jié)束時(shí)恢復(fù)至基礎(chǔ)水平。兩組患者均于牽拉子宮時(shí)MAP最低，B組MAP降低較A組有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05），其余各時(shí)間點(diǎn)各組間無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異（P0.05）。組內(nèi)比較，A組靜注長(zhǎng)托寧后，各時(shí)間點(diǎn)HR與基礎(chǔ)值相比無(wú)顯著差異（P0.05），而B(niǎo)組在牽拉腹膜、腹腔探查及牽拉子宮時(shí)，心率有所下降，（T3、T4、T5）與T1相比，有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）。組間比較，兩組患者在牽拉子宮時(shí)HR差別有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05），其余各時(shí)間點(diǎn)均無(wú)顯著差異（P0.05）。（3）A組的鎮(zhèn)靜評(píng)分明顯高于B組（P0.05）。兩組寒戰(zhàn)發(fā)生率經(jīng)檢驗(yàn)，差異具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）。兩組患者惡心嘔吐發(fā)生率無(wú)明顯差異（P0.05）。 結(jié)論：長(zhǎng)托寧預(yù)先給藥在腰硬聯(lián)合麻醉中應(yīng)用有利于患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)穩(wěn)定，減少寒戰(zhàn)發(fā)生率，同時(shí)提高患者的鎮(zhèn)靜滿意度，無(wú)藥物不良反應(yīng)的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the efficacy of Changtonin in preventing and treating shivering after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, hemodynamic changes and sedative effect. Methods: 80 patients with ASAI II, aged from 45 to 60 years old, weighing 50 ~ 70 kg and standing 155 ~ 165 cm / m ~ (-1) BMI18 ~ (18) kg / m ~ 2, were randomly divided into two groups: group A (Changtonin group) and group B (blank control group). Five minutes before anesthesia, group A was injected with Changtonin 0.01mg/kg (diluted to 2ml with normal saline) and group B was injected with the same volume of saline. In the right lateral position, the patients were punctured into the subarachnoid space in the L2-3 space, and 0.75% bupivacaine 2.0ml (10-20sec) was injected uniformly. The catheter was placed in the epidural space. After fixing catheter, the patient changed to supine position and adjusted the block level below T 6 by posture. According to the hypofunction of spinal anaesthesia, Lidocaine was added through epidural catheter at 5 ml. During the operation, continuous monitoring of ECGV NIBP was performed, and the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (map) at the end of operation (T7) were recorded, and the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (map) were recorded at the end of operation (T7), peritoneal traction (T3), pelvic exploration (T4), traction uterus (T5), closure of abdomen (T6), heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (map) at the end of operation (T7). HR and map of the patients at the time of entering the room were treated with HR and MAPP after 10 minutes of lying still on the operating bed. Observe the incidence of shivering. The sedation score (Ramsay score) was observed and recorded. Results: (1) there was no significant difference in ASA grade, age, body weight, transfusion volume, blood loss, urine volume, irrigation volume and operation time between the two groups (P0.05). (2). Compared with the time of entry, there was statistical significance (P0.05), the operation was almost over to the basic level. The decrease of map in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (P0.05), but there was no significant difference between the other groups at each time point (P0.05). There was no significant difference in HR between group A and T 1 after intravenously injection of Changtonin (P0.05), but in group B, the heart rate decreased when pulling peritoneum, exploring abdominal cavity and pulling uterus, (T3, T4, T5) compared with T1 (P0.05). There was significant difference in HR between the two groups when pulling uterus (P0.05). There was no significant difference in other time points (P0.05). (3). The sedation score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P0.05). The incidence of shivering in the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion: the application of Changtonin in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia is beneficial to hemodynamics stability, reduce the incidence of shivering, improve the patients' sedation satisfaction, and no adverse drug reactions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：R614

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金向紅;硬膜外腔注射少量曲馬多對(duì)手術(shù)患者寒顫的影響[J];蚌埠醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

2 徐偉;夏瑞;鄭吉衛(wèi);王娟;吳芳;朱瓊;李荷純;;右美托咪定與曲馬多預(yù)防腰麻后寒戰(zhàn)作用的比較[J];重慶醫(yī)學(xué);2011年29期

3 孟慶花;徐詠梅;;椎管內(nèi)麻醉后寒戰(zhàn)的影響因素及治療[J];重慶醫(yī)學(xué);2012年13期

4 崔劍;陶國(guó)才;鄧安智;曾子洋;;鹽酸戊乙奎醚在老年心肌缺血患者肌松拮抗中的應(yīng)用[J];第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年16期

5 何榮芝;金文香;黃煥森;常業(yè)恬;;曲馬多聯(lián)合地塞米松預(yù)防產(chǎn)婦腰硬聯(lián)合麻醉后寒顫[J];廣東醫(yī)學(xué);2008年01期

6 周代偉;肖曉山;胡憶華;梁亞統(tǒng);;長(zhǎng)托寧預(yù)防產(chǎn)婦腰硬聯(lián)合麻醉后寒顫劑量探討[J];廣東醫(yī)學(xué);2009年04期

7 李鳳玲;;長(zhǎng)效托寧救治有機(jī)磷農(nóng)藥中毒186例療效觀察[J];工企醫(yī)刊;2000年06期

8 趙書(shū)娥,尹靈朔,趙莉;圍手術(shù)期低體溫及其護(hù)理[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué).護(hù)理學(xué)分冊(cè);1999年01期

9 陳龍水;;曲馬多復(fù)合靜安預(yù)防婦科宮頸癌根治術(shù)在硬膜外麻醉期間寒顫反應(yīng)的臨床觀察[J];河北醫(yī)學(xué);2008年05期

10 文家福,王于川,郝江,張?bào)丬?徐小山,孫林輝;長(zhǎng)效托寧救治有機(jī)磷農(nóng)藥中毒臨床分析(附69例報(bào)告)[J];急診醫(yī)學(xué);1999年04期

本文編號(hào)：2099477