普外科不同麻醉方法術(shù)后護(hù)理體位比較
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-05-28 23:32
本文選題:普外科 + 麻醉方法; 參考:《中西醫(yī)結(jié)合心血管病電子雜志》2016年15期
【摘要】:目的對(duì)比評(píng)價(jià)普外科不同麻醉方法術(shù)后護(hù)理體位的效果。方法選取2014年3月~2015年3月我院收治的麻醉(全身麻醉、硬膜外麻醉、頸叢麻醉)術(shù)后患者96例納入本次研究,按隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為對(duì)照組與觀察組,各48例。對(duì)照組于術(shù)后去枕平臥6 h然后改為半臥位;觀察組術(shù)后直接行半臥位或低半臥位,對(duì)兩組護(hù)理體位效果。結(jié)果在頭痛、嘔吐、眩暈、不適發(fā)生率上,觀察組均明顯低于對(duì)照組,兩組數(shù)據(jù)差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論普外科行全身麻醉、硬膜外麻醉以及頸叢麻醉的患者,有必要于術(shù)后行舒適體位,以此使患者體位護(hù)理滿意度得到有效提高。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare and evaluate the effect of nursing postures after different anesthesia methods in general surgery. Methods 96 patients (general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, cervical plexus anesthesia) who were treated in our hospital from March 2014 to March 2015 were selected and divided into control group (n = 48) and observation group (n = 48). In the control group, the occipital recumbent was removed for 6 hours and then changed to the semi-lying position, while the observation group took the semi-lying position or the low-lying position directly after operation, which was effective in nursing posture of the two groups. Results the incidence of headache, vomiting, vertigo and discomfort in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion in general surgery patients undergoing general anesthesia epidural anesthesia and cervical plexus anesthesia it is necessary to perform comfortable posture after operation so as to improve the satisfaction degree of postural nursing.
【作者單位】: 黑龍江省黑河市遜克縣遜河鎮(zhèn)中心衛(wèi)生院;
【分類號(hào)】:R473.6
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 李振花;頸叢麻醉下甲狀腺手術(shù)并發(fā)癥的相關(guān)因素分析和護(hù)理對(duì)策[J];四川省衛(wèi)生管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期
2 林百鳳;;頸叢麻醉下甲狀腺手術(shù)并發(fā)癥分析與護(hù)理干預(yù)[J];齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年12期
3 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號(hào):1948614
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1948614.html
最近更新
教材專著