頭部神經(jīng)阻滯聯(lián)合靜脈全麻在開(kāi)顱手術(shù)麻醉中的應(yīng)用
本文選題:羅哌卡因 切入點(diǎn):神經(jīng)阻滯 出處:《中南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:目的探討頭部神經(jīng)阻滯復(fù)合靜脈全麻在神經(jīng)外科麻醉中的臨床應(yīng)用。 方法40例因額顳頂部占位擬行病灶切除術(shù)患者隨機(jī)分為羅哌卡因神經(jīng)阻滯組(R組)和對(duì)照組(C組),每組20例。R組于誘導(dǎo)前選擇耳顳神經(jīng)、眶上神經(jīng)和枕大神經(jīng)、枕小神經(jīng)以0.5%羅哌卡因行神經(jīng)阻滯。C組不進(jìn)行神經(jīng)阻滯。常規(guī)麻醉誘導(dǎo)行氣管插管后用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼靶控輸注維持麻醉。記錄不同時(shí)間點(diǎn)的心率、平均動(dòng)脈壓、腦電雙頻指數(shù),以及丙泊酚與瑞芬太尼使用總量、拔管時(shí)間,術(shù)后2h、6h、24h、48h疼痛視覺(jué)模擬評(píng)分(VAS),術(shù)后麻醉相關(guān)并發(fā)癥。 結(jié)果兩組患者術(shù)中血流動(dòng)力學(xué)均穩(wěn)定,R組瑞芬太尼使用總量少于C組(P0.05)。兩組拔管時(shí)間、丙泊酚使用總量、術(shù)后并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。兩組的VAS在2h和6h差別有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),術(shù)后24h和48h,兩組VAS評(píng)分差別無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。 結(jié)論頭部神經(jīng)阻滯復(fù)合靜脈全麻可減少顱腦手術(shù)中瑞芬太尼用量,患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)穩(wěn)定,術(shù)后鎮(zhèn)痛效果良好。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical application of head nerve block combined with intravenous general anesthesia in neurosurgery. Methods A total of 40 patients were randomly divided into ropivacaine block group (n = 20) and control group C (n = 20). The auricular and temporal nerve, supraorbital nerve and occipital nerve were selected before induction in each group (n = 20). The small occipital nerve was treated with 0.5% ropivacaine. No nerve block was performed in group C. the anesthesia was maintained by target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil after endotracheal intubation during routine anesthesia induction. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded at different time points. The bispectral index of EEG, the total amount of propofol and remifentanil, the extubation time, the visual analogue score of pain at 2 h, 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after operation, and the complications associated with anesthesia were observed. Results the total amount of remifentanil used in group R was less than that in group C (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference in VAS between the two groups at 2 h and 6 h, and at 24 h and 48 h after operation, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups (P 0.05). Conclusion head nerve block combined with intravenous general anesthesia can reduce the dosage of remifentanil in craniocerebral surgery.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:R614
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 段慶芳;蘭飛;王天龍;;瑞芬太尼致術(shù)后急性疼痛的研究進(jìn)展[J];北京醫(yī)學(xué);2013年08期
2 劉冬華;徐凌忠;;急性疼痛服務(wù)組織對(duì)開(kāi)胸術(shù)后患者疼痛控制的模式與應(yīng)用效果[J];當(dāng)代醫(yī)學(xué);2014年03期
3 賈茜茜;劉小穎;;不同年齡患者異丙酚靶控輸注的腦電雙頻指數(shù)比較[J];中國(guó)臨床藥理學(xué)雜志;2014年02期
4 白念岳;郭曲練;程智剛;王月玲;楊勝輝;;瑞芬太尼和芬太尼復(fù)合丙泊酚靶控輸注在神經(jīng)外科手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2009年01期
5 孫麗華;楊桐偉;;異丙酚靶控輸注的最新進(jìn)展[J];吉林醫(yī)學(xué);2006年08期
6 徐建國(guó);;成人術(shù)后疼痛治療進(jìn)展[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;2011年03期
7 顧志清;金泉英;;靶控輸注技術(shù)在小兒麻醉中的應(yīng)用[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;2011年07期
8 胡利國(guó);方才;;靶控輸注技術(shù)在臨床麻醉中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[J];中國(guó)臨床保健雜志;2011年03期
9 吳新民;王俊科;莊心良;葉鐵虎;杭燕南;曲仁海;徐建國(guó);薛張綱;熊利澤;王國(guó)林;歐陽(yáng)葆怡;孫曉雄;郭曲練;;椎管內(nèi)阻滯并發(fā)癥防治專家共識(shí)(快捷)[J];中國(guó)繼續(xù)醫(yī)學(xué)教育;2011年10期
10 丁久紅;鄭文澤;;頭部神經(jīng)阻滯在開(kāi)顱手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];臨床麻醉學(xué)雜志;2009年12期
,本文編號(hào):1574647
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1574647.html