【摘要】：目的調(diào)查上海市松江區(qū)區(qū)域影像聯(lián)合體成立5年來放射診斷同質(zhì)化發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,探討如何進(jìn)一步提高放射診斷同質(zhì)化水平。方法于2016年6—8月,選取松江區(qū)影像聯(lián)合體內(nèi)15家社區(qū)醫(yī)院的全體放射工作人員(放射醫(yī)生、放射技師)及與放射科相關(guān)醫(yī)務(wù)人員、到放射科攝片患者或體檢人員300例。采用自行設(shè)計問卷進(jìn)行調(diào)查,問卷內(nèi)容包括被調(diào)查人員的基本情況、聯(lián)合體知曉度、聯(lián)合體成立5年來成效、放射診斷同質(zhì)化狀況。共發(fā)放問卷300份,回收有效問卷286份,問卷有效回收率為95.3%。結(jié)果 73.1%(209/286)的被調(diào)查人員對社區(qū)醫(yī)院放射報告的審核單位回答正確,47.6%(136/286)的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為區(qū)內(nèi)放射檢查更加便捷,58.4%(167/286)的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為區(qū)內(nèi)重復(fù)性放射檢查減少,41.7%(118/283)的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為區(qū)內(nèi)放射檢查費(fèi)用減少,49.3%(141/286)的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為社區(qū)放射醫(yī)生業(yè)務(wù)水平有所提高。是否為醫(yī)務(wù)人員及不同在業(yè)情況、學(xué)歷的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為社區(qū)放射醫(yī)生業(yè)務(wù)水平有所提高的選擇率比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。47.0%(134/285)的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為社區(qū)醫(yī)院與區(qū)中心醫(yī)院放射科業(yè)務(wù)水平無差距。是否為醫(yī)務(wù)人員的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為社區(qū)醫(yī)院與區(qū)中心醫(yī)院放射業(yè)務(wù)水平無差距的選擇率比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05);不同在業(yè)情況、學(xué)歷的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為社區(qū)醫(yī)院與區(qū)中心醫(yī)院放射業(yè)務(wù)水平無差距的選擇率比較,差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。75.9%(217/286)的被調(diào)查人員認(rèn)為將社區(qū)放射醫(yī)生的業(yè)務(wù)學(xué)習(xí)納入?yún)^(qū)影像診斷中心管理有利于提高社區(qū)醫(yī)院放射業(yè)務(wù)水平。是否為醫(yī)務(wù)人員及不同在業(yè)情況、學(xué)歷的被調(diào)查人員對各問題不知道的選擇率比較,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論松江區(qū)影像聯(lián)合體在放射診斷同質(zhì)化方面取得一定成績,同時需要進(jìn)一步提高放射診斷同質(zhì)化水平,如將社區(qū)放射醫(yī)生業(yè)務(wù)學(xué)習(xí)納入?yún)^(qū)診斷中心管理。另外加大對低學(xué)歷、非在業(yè)、非醫(yī)務(wù)人員的宣傳,有利于提高百姓獲得感。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the development of radiologic diagnosis homogenization in the five years since the establishment of the regional imaging association in Songjiang District of Shanghai, and to explore how to further improve the level of radiation diagnosis homogenization. Methods from June to August 2016, 300 radiographers (radiologists, radiographers) and medical personnel associated with radiology were selected from 15 community hospitals in Songjiang District. A self-designed questionnaire was used to conduct the survey, which included the basic information of the respondents, the degree of knowledge of the association, the effectiveness of the association in the past 5 years, and the status of radiology diagnosis homogeneity. A total of 300 questionnaires were sent out, 286 valid questionnaires were collected, and the effective recovery rate was 95.3%. Results 73.1% (209 / 286) of the respondents responded correctly to the unit that examined the radiation reports in community hospitals. 47.6% (136 / 286) of the respondents thought that the area's radiological examination was more convenient, 58.4% (167 / 286), and the respondents said that the number of repetitive examinations in the region was reduced by 41.7% (118 / 283). Investigators said 49.3 percent (141 / 286) of the cost of radiation screening in the region had been reduced by 49.3 percent, and that community radiologists had improved their skills. Whether it is the medical staff and the different working conditions, and whether the respondents with academic qualifications think that the professional level of the community radiologists has improved in the selection rate, The difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). 47.0% (134 / 285) of the respondents believed that there was no difference in the level of radiology between community hospitals and regional central hospitals. There were significant differences in the rate of choice between community hospitals and district central hospitals in terms of the level of radioactivity among those surveyed (P0.05); in different employment situations, there was a significant difference in the selection rate between the two groups (P0.05), and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). The survey staff with academic qualifications considered that there was no difference in the level of radiological work between community hospitals and district central hospitals. The difference was not statistically significant (P0.05). 75.9% (217 / 286) of the respondents believed that the integration of community radiologists' professional learning into the management of regional imaging diagnosis center was beneficial to improve the level of radiation business in community hospitals. There were significant differences in the selection rate of medical staff and different working conditions among the survey staff who had no knowledge of each question (P0.05). Conclusion the imaging consortia in Songjiang district have made some achievements in the aspect of radiology diagnosis homogeneity, and the level of radiology diagnosis homogeneity should be further improved, for example, the community radiologists' professional study should be brought into the management of the district diagnosis center. In addition, the increase of low education, non-employment, non-medical personnel publicity, conducive to improve the people's sense of access.
【作者單位】： 上海市松江區(qū)中心醫(yī)院放射科;
【基金】：上海市衛(wèi)生和計劃生育委員會政策研究課題(2016HP039)
【分類號】：R197.32;R814

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐衛(wèi)清;姚麗娣;;建立區(qū)域化放射診斷中心的設(shè)想與實踐[J];醫(yī)院管理論壇;2011年07期

2 歐陽昭連;周平;陳薇;杜然然;池慧;;基于國際專利計量的醫(yī)用放射診斷設(shè)備技術(shù)分布研究[J];中國醫(yī)療器械信息;2013年12期

3 張東風(fēng);劉仁祜;王國棟;鄧文勝;王曉斌;;吉安市放射診斷設(shè)備質(zhì)量控制現(xiàn)狀[J];職業(yè)與健康;2010年20期

4 王新明;朱維杰;韓浚;武大鵬;蘇旭;;北京市80臺放射診斷設(shè)備性能檢測與分析[J];中國輻射衛(wèi)生;2014年01期

5 金若剛;王建中;符中華;;長沙市放射診斷設(shè)備質(zhì)量控制現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查[J];中華放射醫(yī)學(xué)與防護(hù)雜志;2006年01期

6 尹建東;郭啟勇;;放射診斷質(zhì)量評價ROC理論及其數(shù)據(jù)處理[J];中國衛(wèi)生統(tǒng)計;2009年01期

7 王明利;MERCURY332通用放射診斷遙控床故障維修3例[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)儀器與應(yīng)用;2004年01期

8 楊午;IEC放射診斷質(zhì)量保證標(biāo)準(zhǔn)概況[J];中國醫(yī)療器械雜志;1995年05期

9 劉立煒;手術(shù)病例追蹤登記是放射診斷全面質(zhì)量管理的重要一環(huán)[J];中國醫(yī)院管理;1997年08期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 記者 顧泳;放射科“行家”走到“臺前”看片[N];解放日報;2011年

2 本報記者 尤勇;趙汝范:山城放射診斷權(quán)威[N];本溪日報;2009年

，

本文編號：2161611