超聲造影和定量分析參數(shù)在創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂診斷和分級中的價值
本文選題:創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂 + 增強(qiáng)CT。 參考:《中國超聲醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》2015年12期
【摘要】:目的通過與增強(qiáng)CT對比,探討超聲造影在創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂診斷和分級中的應(yīng)用,并分析創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂超聲造影定量參數(shù)的臨床價值。方法回顧性分析43例經(jīng)手術(shù)或臨床證實(shí)的創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂患者的超聲造影表現(xiàn),與增強(qiáng)CT比較診斷和分級性能,并分析損傷區(qū)及正常脾實(shí)質(zhì)造影劑到達(dá)時間、達(dá)峰時間、峰值強(qiáng)度、流出時間。結(jié)果 43例創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂患者,超聲造影和增強(qiáng)CT診斷創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂的準(zhǔn)確率均為97.7%,超聲造影分級準(zhǔn)確率為93.0%,增強(qiáng)CT分級準(zhǔn)確率為90.7%,兩種方法統(tǒng)計學(xué)比較差異均無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05);脾破裂損傷區(qū)時間-強(qiáng)度曲線表現(xiàn)為"慢上慢下型",脾破裂各分級損傷區(qū)間及與正常脾組織間造影劑AT、TTP和WT比較差異無統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.05),脾破裂各分級損傷區(qū)間及與正常脾組織造影劑PI兩兩比較差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P0.01)。結(jié)論超聲造影和增強(qiáng)CT在創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂的診斷和分級中有很好的一致性,根據(jù)峰值強(qiáng)度可判斷創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂的嚴(yán)重程度,可為臨床醫(yī)師治療方案的選擇提供幫助。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the application of contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis and grading of traumatic splenic rupture and to analyze the clinical value of quantitative parameters of the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Methods the ultrasonographic findings of 43 patients with traumatic splenic rupture confirmed by surgery or clinic were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic and grading performances were compared with those of enhanced CT. The time of arrival and peak time of contrast media in the injured area and normal splenic parenchyma were analyzed. Peak intensity, outflow time. Results 43 patients with traumatic splenic rupture, The accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of traumatic splenic rupture was 97.77.The accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT was 93.0 and 90.7 respectively. There was no significant difference between the two methods in the diagnosis of traumatic splenic rupture (P 0.05). The intensity curve showed "slow upper and lower type", and there was no significant difference between each grade injury interval of spleen rupture and the contrast medium ATTTP and WT between spleen rupture and normal splenic tissue (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference between each grade injury interval of spleen rupture and normal splenic tissue angiography. The difference of Pi was statistically significant (P 0.01). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced CT is consistent in the diagnosis and grading of traumatic splenic rupture. According to the peak intensity, the severity of traumatic splenic rupture can be judged, and it may be helpful for clinicians to choose the treatment scheme.
【作者單位】: 廣西醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬民族醫(yī)院暨廣西壯族自治區(qū)民族醫(yī)院超聲科;
【基金】:廣西壯族自治區(qū)衛(wèi)生廳資助課題(No.Z.2013285)
【分類號】:R445.1;R657.62
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王中秋;;創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂6例診治體會[J];工企醫(yī)刊;2000年04期
2 白彥生,李申,王鵬志;創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂169例臨床分析[J];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年03期
3 原希榮,魏懷芬;創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂40例分析[J];中國誤診學(xué)雜志;2001年03期
4 宋甫春 ,李維邦;非手術(shù)治療創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂體會[J];中國綜合臨床;2002年02期
5 凌中華;創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂治療方案的選擇(附34例報告)[J];華北煤炭醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期
6 徐學(xué)匯,左富義;92例創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂的診斷體會[J];實(shí)用醫(yī)藥雜志;2003年09期
7 袁曉東,唐文華,陳世平,黃曉明,徐敏;創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂90例報告[J];中國普外基礎(chǔ)與臨床雜志;2004年03期
8 厲學(xué)民,許龍?zhí)?毛根軍,張家敏,吳榮進(jìn);創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂的非手術(shù)治療[J];中華肝膽外科雜志;2005年08期
9 黃國強(qiáng);;初議創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂治療方法[J];基層醫(yī)學(xué)論壇;2008年11期
10 吳兵;衡雪芹;鄧爭鳴;;28例創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂的非手術(shù)治療體會[J];河北醫(yī)學(xué);2008年09期
相關(guān)會議論文 前2條
1 楊玉立;;創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂的診斷和急救處理[A];第三屆全國急診創(chuàng)傷學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文匯編[C];1999年
2 金平;張德峰;朱艦艇;;微創(chuàng)治療創(chuàng)傷性脾破裂42例體會[A];2013年浙江省外科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2013年
,本文編號:1963673
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/fangshe/1963673.html