【摘要】：割草場(chǎng)作為牲畜過冬所需飼料的儲(chǔ)備倉庫,在畜牧業(yè)發(fā)展中扮演著十分重要的角色。割草場(chǎng)退化及其改良是目前草地生態(tài)學(xué)研究的焦點(diǎn)問題之一。為探索切根、施肥對(duì)典型草原割草場(chǎng)的改良效果,本研究以內(nèi)蒙古錫林浩特市毛登牧場(chǎng)內(nèi)羊草(Leymus chinensis)典型草原割草場(chǎng)為研究對(duì)象,在切根與未切根樣地分別進(jìn)行不同梯度的氮磷養(yǎng)分配比添加,對(duì)植物群落特征及土壤理化特性進(jìn)行比較分析,為退化割草場(chǎng)的改良提供理論指導(dǎo)及參考。主要研究結(jié)果如下:1、RC3(切根+N12.6g/m2+P2.7g/m2)處理植物群落地上生物量較對(duì)照顯著增加 56.63%(P0.05);RC2(切根+N8.4g/m2+P 1.8 g/m2)處理羊草種群地上生物量較對(duì)照顯著增加80.32%(P0.05)。2、切根+施肥增加了羊草種群密度,提高了羊草種群地上生物量。施肥使羊草莖葉比值降低,增強(qiáng)了植株的光合作用;但在切根+施肥處理中,莖葉比值升高。3、氣候較濕潤時(shí),切根處理顯著提高了植物群落地上生物量和羊草種群地上生物量(P0.05),施肥處理顯著提高了群落地上生物量(P0.05);降水匱乏時(shí),這種作用均不顯著(P0.05)。切根與施肥處理對(duì)群落和種群地上生物量的交互作用不顯著(P0.05)。4、不同改良措施在短期內(nèi)對(duì)土壤理化性質(zhì)無顯著影響(P0.05)。5、RC2處理下割草場(chǎng)生產(chǎn)和經(jīng)濟(jì)效益分別提高813 kg/hm2和233.7 元/hm2。綜上所述,從生態(tài)、生產(chǎn)和經(jīng)濟(jì)效益三個(gè)方面綜合考慮,在氣候較濕潤年份,切根+N 8.4 g/m2+P 1.8 g/m2是羊草典型草原割草場(chǎng)最合理的改良措施。
[Abstract]:Mowing farm, as a storage warehouse for livestock for winter, plays an important role in the development of animal husbandry. The degradation and improvement of mowing field is one of the focuses in grassland ecology. In order to explore the effect of cutting roots and applying fertilizer on the improvement of typical grassland mowing field, this study took Leymus chinensis (Leymus chinensis) typical grassland mowing field in Maodeng pasture of Xilinhaote, Inner Mongolia as the research object. The nitrogen and phosphorus ratios of different gradients were added in the root-cutting and non-root-cutting plots respectively. The plant community characteristics and soil physicochemical properties were compared and analyzed, which provided theoretical guidance and reference for the improvement of degraded mowing fields. The main results were as follows: 1 the aboveground biomass of the plant community treated with RC3 (N12.6g/m2 P2.7g/m2) increased 56.63% (P0.05) compared with the control; The aboveground biomass of Leymus chinensis population treated with RC2 (N8.4g/m2 P 1.8 g/m2) increased significantly by 80.32% (P0.05) compared with the control, and root-cutting fertilization increased the population density and the aboveground biomass of Leymus chinensis population. Fertilization decreased the ratio of stem and leaf of Leymus chinensis and enhanced the photosynthesis of the plants. However, the ratio of stem and leaf increased in the treatment of root-cutting and fertilization. When the climate was wetter, the aboveground biomass of plant community and Leymus chinensis population were significantly increased by root-cutting treatment (P0.05). Fertilization significantly increased the aboveground biomass of the community (P0.05). When precipitation was scarce, the effect was not significant (P0.05). The interaction between root-cutting and fertilization on community and aboveground biomass of population was not significant (P0.05), but different improvement measures had no significant effect on soil physical and chemical properties (P0.05). The production and economic benefit of mowing farm under RC2 treatment were increased by 813 kg/hm2 and 233.7 yuan / hm2., respectively. In conclusion, considering from three aspects of ecology, production and economic benefit, cutting root N 8.4 g/m2 P 1. 8 g/m2 is the most reasonable improvement measure in typical grassland of Leymus chinensis in humid climate year.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：S812

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 代景忠;衛(wèi)智軍;閆瑞瑞;烏仁其其格;辛?xí)云?劉文亭;;N、P添加對(duì)羊草割草場(chǎng)土壤養(yǎng)分及地上生物量的影響[J];中國草地學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

2 朝魯孟其其格;閆曉紅;金花;王志軍;烏尼圖;張國棟;;錫林郭勒盟天然打草場(chǎng)退化與防治措施研究展望[J];草原與草業(yè);2016年01期

3 張俊剛;姜慧敏;李雅茹;寶音陶格濤;;施肥、灌溉對(duì)切根改良草地群落的影響[J];中國草地學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

4 高超;陳積山;邸桂俐;張?jiān)聦W(xué);潘多鋒;王建麗;;施肥對(duì)退化草地羊草種群特征和生物量的影響[J];黑龍江農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2016年01期

5 李星月;孟凱;肖燕子;韓亞瓊;富海江;米福貴;;配方施肥對(duì)苜蓿莖葉比和鮮干比的影響[J];草原與草業(yè);2015年04期

6 卡著才讓;德科加;徐成體;;不同施肥時(shí)間及施氮水平對(duì)高寒草甸生物量和土壤養(yǎng)分的影響[J];草地學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

7 賀星;馬文紅;梁存柱;紅梅;柴曦;趙巴音那木拉;張宇平;楊紹歡;張佳鑫;辛?xí)云?;養(yǎng)分添加對(duì)內(nèi)蒙古不同草地生態(tài)系統(tǒng)生物量的影響[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2015年04期

8 于麗;趙建寧;王慧;白龍;劉紅梅;楊殿林;;養(yǎng)分添加對(duì)內(nèi)蒙古貝加爾針茅草原植物多樣性與生產(chǎn)力的影響[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2015年24期

9 劉東霞;劉貴河;楊志敏;;種植及收獲因子對(duì)紫花苜蓿干草產(chǎn)量和莖葉比的影響[J];草業(yè)學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期

10 楊振海;;草原應(yīng)為美麗中國建設(shè)做出更大貢獻(xiàn)[J];農(nóng)村工作通訊;2015年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 何丹;改良措施對(duì)天然草原植被及土壤的影響[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2009年

2 寶音陶格濤;不同改良措施下退化羊草（Leymus chinensis）草原群落恢復(fù)演替規(guī)律研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張俊剛;不同改良措施對(duì)退化草地群落和土壤特征的影響[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2016年

2 奇立敏;不同切根方式和不同梯度氮素添加對(duì)內(nèi)蒙古退化羊草草地的影響[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2015年

3 王杰;氮素和水分添加對(duì)內(nèi)蒙古貝加爾針茅草原土壤細(xì)菌多樣性的影響[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2014年

4 楊波;不同恢復(fù)措施對(duì)退化羊草（Leymus chinensis）草原影響研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2014年

5 曹杰;垂直切根對(duì)羊草草地群落特征、羊草光合特性及根莖養(yǎng)分的影響[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2305065