營養(yǎng)舔磚對肉牛瘤胃發(fā)酵、血液生理生化指標(biāo)生產(chǎn)性能及肉品質(zhì)的影響
[Abstract]:In this paper, a single factor complete trial design was used to divide 20 months of age, 427-24kg body weight and 90 Horqin yellow cattle into 3 groups, 30 heads each. In the same diet feeding mode, the test group (molasses group) was fed with molasses licking brick during the pre-feeding period, feeding alkali micro-licked brick in the formal test period; two groups (alkali micro group) were fed alkali microlicking brick during the pre-feeding period and the formal period; the control group had no licking brick feeding, and the other feeding modes were the same. The test period was 194d, in which the pre-feeding period was 14d, the formal test period was 180d, a feed sample, a blood sample, a gastric juice sample and a body weight were collected every 30d, 5 heads were randomly selected for slaughter and the related slaughtering performance was determined at the time of the column. The results of the study are as follows: 1. The feed intake of dry matter in molasses group was increased by 5% (P <0.05) than that in control group (P0.05). Compared with the control group, the daily gain of the molasses group and the base microgroup increased by 11.2% and 8% respectively, but the difference among the groups was not significant (P0.05). The ratio of meat to meat in molasses group, alkali microgroup and control group was 7.29, 5.7. 5 and 7.73 respectively, but there was no significant difference among the groups (P0.05). The rumen pH of the two groups was higher than that in the control group, among which the highest in the molasses group and no significant difference among the groups (P0.05). In addition, the concentrations of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, isobutyric acid, pentanoic acid and isovalerate were higher than those in the control group (P0.05). The concentration of NH3-N and BCP in rumen of the test group was also slightly higher than that in the control group (P> 0.05). It is proved that using nutritional licking brick can keep the ideal state of the environment in the rumen of beef cattle. The results showed that the number of white blood cells in blood was higher than that in control group (P0.05). The concentration of growth hormone (GH) in blood of control group was significantly higher than that of molasses group (P0.05). In the other sampling period, both groups were higher than those in the control group (P> 0.05), and the concentration of LEP was higher than that in the control group (P> 0.05). The serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) concentration was higher than that in control group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in other sampling points (P> 0.05). The concentration of insulin (INS) was higher than that in the control group (P0.05). There was no significant difference in the concentration of blood cortisol (Cor) between the three groups (P0.05). The total superoxide dismutase (SOD, 30d, and 60d) in serum of beef cattle was significantly higher than that in control group (P0.05). Blood glutathione peroxidase (GSH-P X) concentration 60d, 120d and 180d was significantly higher than that in control group (P0.05). Compared with the control group (P0.01), the concentration of calcium (Ca) was 30d and 60d (P0.05). There was no significant difference in other sampling points (P> 0.05); the concentration of P (P) was higher than that in the control group (P0.05). The concentration of serum copper-blue protein (CP) was not significant (P0.05). The concentration of LDH-L was significantly higher than that in the control group (P0.01). In 180d, the concentration of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly higher than that in control group (P0.05). There was no adverse effect on the slaughtering performance of beef cattle by supplementing nutrition licking brick. Effect of nutritional licking brick on economic benefit of beef cattle. Compared with the control group, the molasses group was more profitable than the control group with a profit of RMB 1. 20 yuan/ d, and the base micro-group was more profitable than the control group at a profit of 0. 55 yuan/ d.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:S823.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉暉,胡明,馮家保,張彪;“紅洛奇”礦物營養(yǎng)舔磚育肥肉牛效果試驗[J];黃牛雜志;2001年06期
2 高峰,周光宏;建立完善我國優(yōu)質(zhì)牛肉生產(chǎn)全程質(zhì)量控制體系[J];黃牛雜志;2002年01期
3 S.P.Tiwari ;U.B.singh ;U.R.Mehra;郭庭雙;張智山;;糖蜜尿素舔塊的制作和飼喂[J];國外畜牧學(xué).草原與牧草;1992年01期
4 張彬,李麗立,曲湘勇,蒲祖松;補飼舔磚對牛血液生理生化指標(biāo)影響的研究[J];中國草食動物;2000年01期
5 吐日根白乙拉;礦物質(zhì)飼料舔塊對綿羊飼養(yǎng)效果的比較試驗[J];當(dāng)代畜禽養(yǎng)殖業(yè);2004年07期
6 梁業(yè)森,逄煥成,溫廣慶,孟慶翔;牛羊復(fù)合營養(yǎng)舔塊飼料生產(chǎn)技術(shù)研究[J];當(dāng)代畜牧;2004年08期
7 云華;許斌;馬青;梅寧安;呂建民;鄭麗霞;馬曉榮;李全智;沈志鵬;;不同營養(yǎng)舔磚對育肥羔羊生產(chǎn)性能的影響[J];當(dāng)代畜牧;2008年11期
8 蔣振山;糖蜜的飼用價值及其添加[J];飼料工業(yè);2000年09期
9 蔣振山;糖蜜在反芻動物飼料中的應(yīng)用[J];飼料工業(yè);2001年05期
10 孟慶翔,張曉明,肖訓(xùn)軍,高巍,夏兆剛;牛羊復(fù)合營養(yǎng)舔塊飼料適宜配方篩選的研究[J];飼料工業(yè);2002年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 參木有;影響舔塊質(zhì)量參數(shù)的因素和添加酵母培養(yǎng)物及纖維分解酶舔塊的營養(yǎng)價值評定[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 閆祥林;營養(yǎng)水平對肉牛生產(chǎn)性能及牛肉品質(zhì)的影響[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2003年
,本文編號:2290905
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/2290905.html