本文選題：羊 + 寄生蟲��； 參考：《廣西大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：為了了解林牧公司羊群寄生蟲感染情況,并針對性地驅蟲,提高羊群的健康度,本課題對林牧公司羊群的1200只山羊進行調(diào)查,健康羊有562只,不健康羊有638只。從1200只羊的糞便中,檢出帶線蟲的糞便數(shù)為180份,線蟲感染率為15%；檢出帶吸蟲糞便數(shù)為36份,吸蟲感染率為3%；檢出帶絳蟲糞便數(shù)為24份,絳蟲感染率為2%；蠕蟲感染率總共為18%(216/1200)。檢出帶球蟲糞便數(shù)為638份,球蟲感染率為53%(638/1200)。抽取256只不健康羊,分為斷奶羊組、育肥羊組、種母羊組、種公羊(公羊)組,每組64只,直腸取糞便256份,用直接涂片法、碘液染色法、飽和鹽水漂浮法、離心沉淀法檢查糞樣。斷奶羊組檢出帶球蟲和線蟲的糞樣分別為61份和6份,球蟲感染率、線蟲感染分別為95.3%(61/64)和9.4%(6/64)；育肥羊組檢出帶球蟲和線蟲的糞樣分別為58份和11份,球蟲感染率、線蟲感染分別為90.6%(58/64)和17.2%(11/64)；種母羊組檢出帶球蟲和線蟲的糞樣分別為59份和8份,球蟲感染率、線蟲感染分別為92.2%(59/64)和12.5%(8/64)；種公羊(公羊)組檢出帶球蟲和線蟲的糞樣分別為59份和11份,球蟲感染率、線蟲感染分別為92.2%(59/64)和17.2%(11/64)。從檢查結果可以看出,林牧公司羊群球蟲感染率比線蟲感染率高。斷奶羊組、育肥羊組、種母羊組、種公羊(公羊)組分別用痢寧溶液、痢寧溶液和伊力新注射液、磺胺喹嗯啉鈉粉劑和痢寧溶液、磺胺喹嗯啉鈉粉劑進行驅蟲,驅蟲后各組球蟲感染率均降低,斷奶羊組降低了17.2%,育肥羊組降低了1.5%,種母羊組降低了87.5%,種公羊(公羊)組降低了1.6%,驅球蟲結果表明,磺胺喹嗯啉鈉粉劑與痢寧溶液聯(lián)合應用效果與痢寧溶液、伊力新注射液和痢寧溶液聯(lián)合應用、磺胺喹嗯啉鈉粉劑相比有顯著差異(p0.01)。驅蟲后各組線蟲感染率變化無規(guī)律,斷奶羊組為17.2%(驅蟲前9.4%),育肥羊組為7.8%(驅蟲前17.2%),種母羊組為10.9%(驅蟲前12.5%),種公羊(公羊)組為9.4%(驅蟲前17.2%)。
[Abstract]:In order to understand the infection of herding parasites in forestry and animal husbandry companies and to improve the health of sheep, 1200 goats were investigated in this paper. There were 562 healthy sheep and 638 unhealthy sheep. From the feces of 1200 sheep, 180 cases of nematodes were detected, the infection rate of nematode was 15; the number of feces with paragonimiasis was 36, the infection rate of paragonimiasis was 3; the number of faeces of Taenia solium was 24, the infection rate of tapeworm was 22.The total infection rate of worm was 1816 / 1200. The number of feces with coccidiosis was 638, and the infection rate of coccidia was 5338 / 1200. 256 unhealthy sheep were selected and divided into weaning group, fattening group, ewe group and male sheep (ram) group with 64 in each group. 256 feces were collected from rectum, followed by direct smear method, iodine staining method and saturated saline floating method. The feces were examined by centrifugal precipitation method. The fecal samples of coccidiosis and nematode were 61 and 6, respectively. The infection rate of coccidiosis and nematode were 95.31- / 64) and 9.4x / 64, respectively, and the feces samples of coccidiosis and nematode were 58 and 11, respectively, and the infection rate of coccidiosis was found in the fattening sheep group. The number of feces with coccidia and nematodes were 90.6% 58 / 64 and 17.2 / 64, respectively, and 59 and 8 feces with coccidiosis and nematodes were detected in ewe group, respectively. The number of feces with coccidia and nematode were 59 and 11, respectively. The infection rate of coccidiosis and nematode infection were 92. 2 / 59 / 64 and 92. 2% / 59 / 64 and 17. 2% / 64 respectively. The results showed that the infection rate of herd coccidiosis was higher than that of nematodes. Weaning sheep group, breeding fattening sheep group, breeding sheep group and breeding ram group (ram) group were treated with Lining solution, Lining solution and ilisin injection, sulfamethrin sodium powder, sulfaquinoline sodium powder, and sulfamethrin sodium powder, respectively. After deworming, the infection rate of coccidiosis in all groups decreased, the weaning group decreased 17.2%, the fattening sheep group decreased 1.5 and the breeding ewe group decreased 87.5%, and the breeding ram (ram) group decreased 1.6%. There was significant difference between sulfaquinoline sodium powder and sulfaquinoline sodium powder as compared with that of lixigenin solution, ilexin injection and triamcinol solution, compared with sulfaquine sodium powder (P 0.01). There was no regular change of nematode infection rate in each group after insect repellent. The infection rate of weaning sheep was 17.2 (before insect repellent 9.4%), that of fattening sheep was 7.8 (before insect repellent 17.2g), that of breeding ewe was 10.9 (first 12.5%) and that of male sheep (ram) was 9.4 (17.2g before insect repellent).
【學位授予單位】：廣西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：S858.26

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 阿曼吐爾·阿黑哈提;;伊犁周邊地區(qū)羊球蟲感染情況調(diào)查報告[J];當代畜牧;2015年03期

2 徐文福;木乃爾什;羅拉體;蘇國富;彭靜梅;駱勇;鄭加銀;曲木力且;汪德成;阿爾扎地;阿庫日呷;何子拉;陸志萍;陳海燕;;羊寄生蟲病調(diào)查及綜合防治技術研究[J];中國草食動物科學;2014年S1期

3 俞濤;徐前明;陳璇;徐穎;;江淮地區(qū)山羊球蟲流行病學調(diào)查[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2013年34期

4 艾琳;陳木新;呂山;臧偉;諸廷俊;許學年;蔡玉春;陳韶紅;羅家軍;陳寶杰;張建國;周曉農(nóng);陳家旭;;云南賓川地區(qū)牛羊片形吸蟲感染調(diào)查及分子鑒定[J];熱帶醫(yī)學雜志;2013年06期

5 王廣威;;驅蟲藥在羊群中的應用[J];中國畜牧獸醫(yī)文摘;2013年02期

6 關文怡;蔡澤川;付鳳生;王保中;曹授俊;;北京某山區(qū)絨山羊體外寄生蟲病及防治情況調(diào)查分析[J];山東畜牧獸醫(yī);2012年05期

7 高偉;;畜禽寄生蟲病的診斷方法[J];養(yǎng)殖技術顧問;2011年09期

8 劉峻;戈力;;合肥市養(yǎng)羊場球蟲感染情況調(diào)查[J];中國畜牧獸醫(yī)文摘;2011年02期

9 魏永紅;李有全;殷宏;;動物寄生蟲病的綜合防治研究進展[J];中國動物保健;2011年02期

10 孫志輝;章孝斌;劉峻;丁建平;;羊場山羊球蟲感染情況調(diào)查研究[J];現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)科技;2010年18期

，

本文編號：1831901