巨大芽孢桿菌制劑對牛羊的安全性評價及胃腸道微生物的影響
本文選題:巨大芽孢桿菌 切入點(diǎn):安全性評價 出處:《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:1、通過在日糧中添加推薦劑量的5倍及10倍巨大芽孢桿菌制劑對泌乳奶牛生產(chǎn)性能、瘤胃發(fā)酵、血液生化指標(biāo)的影響,對巨大芽孢桿菌制劑在泌乳奶牛應(yīng)用上的研究進(jìn)行安全性進(jìn)行評價。選擇24頭胎次、泌乳天數(shù)、產(chǎn)奶量相近的健康荷斯坦奶牛,采用完全隨機(jī)區(qū)組設(shè)計,隨機(jī)分為4組,每組6頭。分別在日糧中添加0 g/d·頭、10 g/d·頭(推薦劑量)、50g/d·頭(5倍)和100g/d·頭(10倍)的巨大芽孢桿菌制劑,預(yù)試期14d,正試期63d。結(jié)果表明:在日糧中添加50 g/d·頭(5倍)和100 g/d·頭(10倍)的巨大芽孢桿菌制劑對泌乳奶牛生產(chǎn)性能、瘤胃發(fā)酵以及血液生化指標(biāo)等方面無不良影響。2、研究巨大芽孢桿菌制劑不同添加水平對山羊瘤胃細(xì)菌群落的影響。試驗選用7頭體況良好,體重相近(24±2.37kg)并安裝有永久性瘤胃瘺管的山羊。采用自體對照設(shè)計,共分四期進(jìn)行,第一期僅飼喂基礎(chǔ)日糧;第二期在日糧中添加0.2 g/d·頭巨大芽孢桿菌制劑;第三期在日糧中添加0.4g/d·頭巨大芽孢桿菌制劑;第四期在日糧中添加0.8 g/d·頭巨大芽孢桿菌制劑。采樣期采集瘤胃液,提取總DNA,利用HiSeq2500測序平臺對細(xì)菌16S V4區(qū)進(jìn)行測序分析。結(jié)果表明:(1)0.4 g/d組物種豐富度指數(shù)Chao 1和Ace均顯著高于對照組(P0.05);物種多樣性指數(shù)Simpson和Shannon各處理組之間無顯著差異(P0.05)。(2)山羊瘤胃中擬桿菌門(Bacteroidetes)、厚壁菌門(Firmicutes)、廣古菌門(Euryarchaeota)、綠彎菌門(Chloroflexi)以及變形菌門(Proteobacteria)的相對豐度占94%以上,為瘤胃中優(yōu)勢菌門;(3)0.8 g/d組普雷沃氏菌屬(Prevotella)、理研菌屬(Rikenellaceae)相對比例均顯著高于對照組(P0.05),甲烷短桿菌屬(Methanobrevibacter)相對比例顯著低于對照組(P0.05)。0.2 g/d組鼠孢菌屬(Succiniclasticum)相對比例顯著高于對照組(P0.05)。3、研究巨大芽孢桿菌制劑不同添加水平對山羊瘤胃主要纖維、蛋白質(zhì)降解細(xì)菌,腸道主要有益和有害細(xì)菌的影響。采樣期采集山羊瘤胃液和糞便新鮮樣,提取總DNA,利用qPCR進(jìn)行相對定量。結(jié)果表明:(1)0.4g/d組巨大芽孢桿菌、黃色瘤胃球菌、白色瘤胃球菌相對表達(dá)量顯著高于對照組(P0.05);0.8 g/d組黃色瘤胃球菌、溶纖維丁酸弧菌相對表達(dá)量顯著高于對照組;對照組棲瘤胃普雷沃氏菌相對表達(dá)量顯著低于其他各組(P0.05)。(2)0.2 g/d組乳酸桿菌、擬桿菌相對表達(dá)量顯著高于對照組(P0.05),腸球菌相對表達(dá)量顯著低于其他各組(P0.05);對照組沙門氏菌相對表達(dá)量顯著低于其他各組。結(jié)論:在泌乳奶牛日糧中添加50 g/d·頭、100 g/d·頭巨大芽孢桿菌制劑對奶牛安全性無不良影響。添加l0g/d·頭巨大芽孢桿菌制劑時能夠提高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)乳產(chǎn)量。在山羊日糧中添加0.4 g/d·頭巨大芽孢桿菌制劑可以提高瘤胃細(xì)菌的豐富度。在山羊日糧中添加巨大芽孢桿菌制劑可以促進(jìn)瘤胃中纖維分解菌黃色瘤胃球菌、白色瘤胃球菌;以及蛋白分解菌溶纖維丁酸弧菌、嗜淀粉瘤胃桿菌、棲瘤胃普雷沃氏菌的生長繁殖;以及促進(jìn)山羊腸道中有益微生物乳酸桿菌、擬桿菌生長繁殖,抑制有害微生物腸球菌、沙門氏菌的生長繁殖。
[Abstract]:1, by adding 5 times the recommended dose of Rumen in the diet and 10 times of Bacillus Preparation on production performance of lactating dairy cows, fermentation, influence blood biochemical index, safety of Bacillus megaterium preparation application in lactating dairy cows was evaluated. On 24 first parity, lactation, milk yield similar to healthy Holstein cows, using randomized complete block design, were randomly divided into 4 groups, 6 pigs in each group. 0 g/d head were added in the diets of 10 g/d (recommended dose), head 50g/d head (5 times) and 100g/d (10 times) - head of huge bacillus preparation pre trial period, 14d test period 63d. results showed that the addition of 50 g/d per head in the diet (5 times) and 100 g/d (10 times) the head of Bacillus megaterium preparation on production performance of lactating dairy cows, rumen fermentation and blood biochemical indexes and no adverse effects of.2 on Bacillus Preparation different adding water The impact on the community of goat rumen bacteria. Experiment 7 head body in good condition, with similar body weight (24 + 2.37kg) and fitted with permanent rumen fistulated goats. Using auto control design, is divided into four phases, the first phase only fed the basal diet supplemented with 0.2 g; second /d, head of Bacillus megaterium preparation in diets; third add 0.4g/d - head of Bacillus megaterium preparation in diets; fourth with 0.8 g/d - head of Bacillus megaterium preparation in the diet. The sampling period collecting rumen fluid, the extraction of total DNA by HiSeq2500 sequencing analysis platform for sequencing of bacterial 16S V4 region. The results showed that: (1) 0.4 g/d species richness index of Chao 1 and Ace were significantly higher than control group (P0.05); there was no significant difference between the species diversity index of Simpson and Shannon in each treatment group (P0.05). (2) the Bacteroidetes in rumen (Bacteroidetes), Firmicutes (Firmicutes), Guangzhou Archaea gate (Euryarchaeota), Chloroflexi (Chloroflexi) and Proteobacteria (Proteobacteria) relative abundance accounted for more than 94%, as the dominant bacteria in the rumen; (3) 0.8 g/d group (Prevotella), the Poulet Was genus RIKEN sp. (Rikenellaceae) ratio were significantly higher than control group (P0.05 Brevibacterium), methane (Methanobrevibacter) ratio was significantly lower than the control group (P0.05).0.2 g/d group sp. (Succiniclasticum) ratio was significantly higher than the control group (.3, P0.05) of Bacillus megaterium preparations with different addition levels on the rumen main fiber, protein degradation bacteria, effects of intestinal beneficial and harmful bacteria. Sampling of gastric juice and goat feces collection period of fresh tumor samples, extracted the total DNA, relative quantification by qPCR. The results showed that: (1) 0.4g/d group of Bacillus megaterium, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, r.albus relative expression level significantly Higher than that of the control group (P0.05 group); 0.8 g/d yellow Ruminococcus, b.fibrisolvens relative expression was significantly higher than the control group; the control group in rumen Prevost's bacteria relative expression was significantly lower than the other groups (P0.05). (2) 0.2 g/d group, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides relative expression was significantly higher than that of control group (P0.05), the relative expression of Enterococcus was significantly lower than other groups (P0.05); the control group Salmonella expression was significantly lower than that of the other groups. Conclusion: the addition of 50 g/d in lactating dairy cow diets, 100 g/d - head of Bacillus megaterium preparation on dairy safety without adverse effects. Add l0g/d huge head bacillus preparation can improve the standard milk yield. Adding 0.4 g/d head of Bacillus megaterium preparation can improve the richness of rumen bacteria in goat diets. Add bacillus preparation in goat diets can promote the rumen fiber Decomposing bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens, r.albus; and protein decomposing bacteria b.fibrisolvens, ruminobacter amylophilus, Prevost's habitat rumen bacteria; and promote goat intestinal beneficial microorganism in Lactobacillus, Bacteroides growth inhibition, Enterococcus harmful bacterium, Salmonella growth and reproduction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:S823.5;S827.5
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳麗艷,白鳳珍,陳立軍;芽孢桿菌對肉仔雞蛋白質(zhì)代謝的影響[J];內(nèi)蒙古民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2005年01期
2 繆志軍;王向榮;張旭;蔣桂韜;楚立雄;;益生芽孢桿菌制劑飼喂產(chǎn)蛋雞效果試驗[J];湖南畜牧獸醫(yī);2010年03期
3 譚武貴;姜清香;李蓓蓓;;飼用芽孢桿菌制劑配伍研究進(jìn)展[J];中國畜牧獸醫(yī)文摘;2012年05期
4 姜清香;;飼用芽孢桿菌制劑的配伍研究[J];湖南畜牧獸醫(yī);2013年01期
5 郭偉;王密;劉冰;王昕陟;;芽孢桿菌制劑對肉雞生產(chǎn)性能的影響[J];現(xiàn)代畜牧獸醫(yī);2010年01期
6 陳崗;沈潔;;芽孢桿菌PAS38和β-甘露聚糖對家兔小腸生長抑素的影響研究[J];中國畜牧業(yè);2011年17期
7 鄺哲師,田興山,張玲華,周風(fēng)珍,陳薇;芽孢桿菌制劑對斷奶仔豬體內(nèi)消化酶活性的影響[J];中國畜牧獸醫(yī);2005年06期
8 趙希彥;;芽孢桿菌制劑對肉仔雞生產(chǎn)性能和免疫力的影響[J];中國飼料;2009年11期
9 陳崗;沈潔;;芽孢桿菌制劑和甘露聚糖制劑對家兔腸道生長抑素的影響[J];四川畜牧獸醫(yī);2011年11期
10 辛娜;刁其玉;張乃鋒;張永發(fā);周盟;沙懷中;;芽孢桿菌制劑對蛋雞生產(chǎn)性能、血清指標(biāo)及盲腸微生物的影響[J];中國畜牧獸醫(yī);2011年10期
相關(guān)會議論文 前7條
1 祝小;楊慧;潘康成;吳敏峰;;芽孢桿菌制劑對小鼠脾淋巴細(xì)胞轉(zhuǎn)化功能的影響[A];第三屆第八次全國學(xué)術(shù)研討會暨動物微生態(tài)企業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略論壇論文集[C];2006年
2 祝小;潘康成;陳正禮;馮軾;陳剛;楊慧;張金輝;;芽孢桿菌制劑對小鼠免疫功能的影響研究[A];第四屆第九次全國學(xué)術(shù)研討會暨飼料和動物源食品安全戰(zhàn)略論壇論文集(上冊)[C];2008年
3 楊慧;潘康成;張金輝;馮軾;陳正禮;祝小;陳剛;;芽孢桿菌制劑對小鼠腸粘膜抗體分泌細(xì)胞的影響[A];第四屆第九次全國學(xué)術(shù)研討會暨飼料和動物源食品安全戰(zhàn)略論壇論文集(上冊)[C];2008年
4 張旭;王向榮;胡艷;蔣桂韜;李昊幫;戴求仲;;芽孢桿菌制劑對蛋雞生產(chǎn)性能和蛋品質(zhì)的影響[A];第六次全國飼料營養(yǎng)學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2010年
5 潘康成;倪學(xué)勤;方靜;;BL38芽孢桿菌制劑對雞免疫促進(jìn)作用的研究[A];中國畜牧獸醫(yī)學(xué)會動物微生態(tài)學(xué)分會第三屆第六次學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2002年
6 楊慧;潘康成;馮軾;陳正禮;祝小;陳剛;張金輝;;芽孢桿菌制劑對小鼠腸粘膜CD4/CD8和SS細(xì)胞的影響研究[A];第四屆第九次全國學(xué)術(shù)研討會暨飼料和動物源食品安全戰(zhàn)略論壇論文集(上冊)[C];2008年
7 李海利;谷子林;;芽孢桿菌制劑對家兔的免疫營養(yǎng)作用[A];“創(chuàng)新技術(shù)與管理,迎接畜牧業(yè)面臨新挑戰(zhàn)”論文集[C];2013年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 任繼平;芽孢桿菌制劑對大腸桿菌感染仔豬免疫應(yīng)答及腸道菌群影響[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 辛娜;芽孢桿菌制劑對蛋雞與斷奶仔豬的作用效果研究[D];新疆農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年
2 楊慧;芽孢桿菌制劑對小鼠小腸粘膜結(jié)構(gòu)及粘膜免疫的影響研究[D];四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2007年
3 祝小;芽孢桿菌制劑對小鼠下丘腦—垂體—腎上腺—免疫器官的影響[D];四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2007年
4 張曉迪;肉雞生產(chǎn)中氨氣、溫室氣體排放的測定及芽孢桿菌減排效果的研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2013年
5 李麗紅;芽孢桿菌制劑對蛋雞生產(chǎn)性能的影響及其作用機(jī)理的研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2004年
6 吳偉;低聚果糖、芽孢桿菌制劑對斷奶仔豬生長性能及免疫功能的影響[D];河南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號:1615976
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/dongwuyixue/1615976.html