發(fā)布時(shí)間：2025-01-07 00:51

　　作為一個(gè)具有獨(dú)特性和穩(wěn)定性的語(yǔ)類(lèi)新聞?wù)Z篇包括新聞報(bào)導(dǎo)、新聞評(píng)論兩大語(yǔ)篇類(lèi)型,各自底下衍生著反映政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)、科技等等的具體語(yǔ)篇。這些層次共同構(gòu)建出新聞?wù)Z篇的“超語(yǔ)類(lèi)—語(yǔ)類(lèi)—次語(yǔ)類(lèi)—具體語(yǔ)篇”的拓?fù)浣Y(jié)構(gòu),實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)社會(huì)實(shí)踐的參與和構(gòu)建。社論作為新聞評(píng)論次語(yǔ)類(lèi)的一個(gè)主要語(yǔ)篇類(lèi)型凸顯了語(yǔ)篇構(gòu)建者的立場(chǎng)和態(tài)度,對(duì)這一次語(yǔ)類(lèi)的分析可以解構(gòu)出作者對(duì)于社會(huì)事實(shí)的重構(gòu)、作者對(duì)于社會(huì)事實(shí)本身以及讀者的態(tài)度和立場(chǎng)、作者表達(dá)個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)和立場(chǎng)的模式和程度、隱藏在語(yǔ)篇中的社會(huì)意識(shí)形態(tài)、以及特殊的文化思維模式等。因此研究這一課題不僅能夠幫助讀者解讀隱藏于語(yǔ)篇背后的深層意義元素、提供給讀者一個(gè)深層解讀社論的框架,同時(shí)通過(guò)對(duì)語(yǔ)篇評(píng)價(jià)資源的對(duì)比了解中西方在社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)、交際模式、思維方式和語(yǔ)言系統(tǒng)方面的差異。在對(duì)外宣傳、國(guó)家形象外宣以及漢語(yǔ)言文化國(guó)際化的地位日益凸顯的大環(huán)境下,本研究可以為上述領(lǐng)域活動(dòng)提供相應(yīng)的研究視角。 本論文選擇社論語(yǔ)篇作為分析對(duì)象主要鑒于社論作為一個(gè)相對(duì)穩(wěn)定的語(yǔ)類(lèi)已經(jīng)引起語(yǔ)言學(xué)界尤其是語(yǔ)篇分析者們的注意但研究尚未深入全面開(kāi)展。迄今為止對(duì)于社論的研究主要集中在CDA的框架之內(nèi),探討社論語(yǔ)篇結(jié)構(gòu)、修辭策略以...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：210 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements Abstract 摘要 List of Abbreviations List of Figures List of Tables Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Background of the Research
1.2 Objectives of the Research
1.3 Theoretical Foundation
1.4 Methodology
1.5 Signiifcance of the Study
1.6 Organization of the Paper
1.7 Summary Chapter 2 Theoretical Foundations(Ⅰ):Discourse Analysis and Editorials
2.1 Discourse and Discourse Analysis
    2.1.1 Discourse
    2.1.2 Discourse Analysis
    2.1.3 Approaches for Discourse Analysis
    
2.1.3.1 Text Linguistic Approach
    
2.1.3.2 Speech Act Approach
    
2.1.3.3 Pragmatics Approach
    
2.1.3.4 Interactional Sociolinguistic Approach
    
2.1.3.5 Functional Perspective Approach
2.2 The Genre of Editorial Discourse
    2.2.1 Definition of Genre
    2.2.2 Editorials as a Genre of Discourse
2.3 The Present Achievements of Editorial Studies
2.4 Summary Chapter 3 Theoretical Foundations(Ⅱ):Appraisal Theory in SFL
3.1 Brief Introduction of SFL
3.2 The Interpersonal Meaning in SFG
3.3 Development of AT
    3.3.1 The Framework of AT as Meaning Potentials
    3.3.2 Realizations of the Meaning Potentials in AT
    3.3.3 Some Basic Concepts
    
3.3.3.1 Evaluation and Appraisal
    
3.3.3.2 Instantiation
    
3.3.3.3 Ir/realis
    
3.3.3.4 Inscribed and Invoked Appraisal
3.4 Reflection on Appraisal Theory
    3.4.1 Major Breakthroughs of AT
    
3.4.1.1 Expanding the connotation of Interpersonal Meanings in discourses
    
3.4.1.2 Exploring the Concrete Meaning System
    
3.4.1.3 Extending the Interpersonal Meaning to the Discourse Layer
    
3.4.1.4 Enriching the Discourse Analysis Theories
    3.4.2 Further Development in AT
    
3.4.2.1 The Enrichment in Emotions
    
3.4.2.2 The Overlapping among the Appraisals
    
3.4.2.3 The Limited Analysis Layers
    
3.4.2.4 The Exhaustiveness of the Framework
3.5 Summary Chapter 4 Methodology(Ⅰ):Establishment of an Analytical Framework
4.1 Appraisal in Discourse
    4.1.1 The Analyzing Perspectives for Evaluation
    4.1.2 The Apprasal Mechanics in Discourse
    4.1.3 The Appraisal Language
    4.1.4 Interpersonal Meaning
4.2 The Interpersonal Appraisal System
4.3 Appraisal Types
    4.3.1 The System of Polarity
    4.3.2 The System of Attitude
    
4.3.2.1 Parameters in Affect
    
4.3.2.2 Parameters in Judgment
    
4.3.2.3 Parameters in Appreciation
    4.3.3 The System of Engagement
    4.3.4 The System of Graduation
4.4 The System of Appraisal Degree
4.5 The System of Appraisal Realization
    4.5.1 Parameters in Language Realization
    
4.5.1.1 The Phonological Level
    
4.5.1.2 The Lexical Level
    
4.5.1.3 The Clausal Level
    
4.5.1.4 The Discursive Level
    4.5.2 Parameters in Rhetoric Strategy
    
4.5.2.1 Parameters in Rhetoric Devices
    
4.5.2.2 Other Parameters in Rhetoric Strategy
4.6 The Process of Analysis
4.7 Summary Chapter 5 Methodology(Ⅱ):Corpus Description and Processing
5.1 Corpus Description
5.2 Data Process
5.3 The Analysis Model
5.4 The Elimination of the Subjectivity
5.5 Summary Chapter 6 Results and Discussions(Ⅰ):Commonness of Appraisal in Editorials
6.1 The Appraisal Types in Editorials
6.2 The Engagement of Evaluation in Editorials
6.3 The Graduation of Appraisal in Editorials
6.4 The Linguistic Realization of Appraisal in Editorials
    6.4.1 Phonological and Lexical levels
    6.4.2 Clausal Level
    6.4.3 The Discursive Realization of Appraisal
6.5 The Rhetorical Strategies of Appraisal
6.6 The Other Parameters
6.7 Summary Chapter 7 Results and Discussions(Ⅱ):Differences of Appraisal Resourcesbetween E-editorials and C-editorials
7.1 The Overview of the Appraisal
7.2 On the Attitude System
7.3 On the Engagement System
7.4 On the Degree of Appraisal
7.5 On the Language Realizations of Appraisal
7.6 On the Rhetorical Strategy
7.7 On the Other Parameters
7.8 Summary Chapter 8 Causes for the Similarities and Differences
8.1 Overall Similarities and Differences
8.2 Causes for the Similarities
    8.2.1 Appraisal Types
    8.2.2 Appraisal Degree
    8.2.3 Appraisal Realization
8.3 Sociological Causes for the Differences
    8.3.1 Different Appraisal Types
    8.3.2 Different Engagement
    8.3.3 Different Appraisal Degree
    8.3.4 Different Appraisal Realization
    8.3.5 Different Rhetoric Strategies
8.4 Linguistic Factors for the Differences
    8.4.1 The Phonological Level
    8.4.2 The Lexical Level
    8.4.3 The Clausal Level
    8.4.4 The Discursive Level
8.5 Summary Chapter 9 Conclusion
9.1 Major Findings
9.2 Limitations
9.3 Future Study Appendices
Appendix Ⅰ:The Case Study of Analysis under IAS
Appendix Ⅱ:The Editorials Selected as Corpus Bibliography



本文編號(hào)：4024247