本文選題：開(kāi)放政府?dāng)?shù)據(jù) + 評(píng)估體系��； 參考：《情報(bào)資料工作》2017年05期

【摘要】：文章選取了國(guó)際上八個(gè)進(jìn)行過(guò)多年評(píng)估的成熟評(píng)估體系作為調(diào)查對(duì)象,從評(píng)估側(cè)重點(diǎn)、評(píng)估體系框架指標(biāo)、評(píng)估對(duì)象和數(shù)據(jù)獲取方式四方面進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析,并提出未來(lái)我國(guó)建立自己的評(píng)估體系時(shí),應(yīng)注重評(píng)估的全面性、評(píng)估數(shù)據(jù)獲取方式的多元化以及評(píng)估周期的合理調(diào)控。
[Abstract]:This paper selects eight mature evaluation systems which have been evaluated for many years in the world as the objects of investigation, and makes a comparative analysis from four aspects: the evaluation focus, the evaluation system framework index, the evaluation object and the data acquisition method. In the future, we should pay attention to the comprehensiveness of evaluation, the diversification of data acquisition and the reasonable regulation of evaluation cycle when we set up our own evaluation system in the future.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)信息管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“面向國(guó)家大數(shù)據(jù)戰(zhàn)略的政府?dāng)?shù)據(jù)開(kāi)放共享對(duì)策研究”(編號(hào):15ZDC25)的研究成果之一
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G203
，

本文編號(hào)：2002394