發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-13 23:23

  本文選題：文學(xué)范疇 + 辭采��； 參考：《新聞與寫作》2017年04期

【摘要】：正報(bào)紙?jiān)u論不屬于文學(xué)范疇,也沒(méi)有必要刻意當(dāng)作文學(xué)作品來(lái)經(jīng)營(yíng)。即使雜文,被認(rèn)為是文學(xué)性的評(píng)論,評(píng)論也是主體。因此,以觀點(diǎn)為主帥,以辭采兵衛(wèi)之,這個(gè)主次關(guān)系是對(duì)的。但這不是說(shuō),報(bào)紙?jiān)u論就一定要排斥文學(xué)要素。無(wú)論闡述政策、評(píng)議時(shí)事還是針貶時(shí)弊,都應(yīng)該講究文章的知識(shí)性、可讀性。這便引出許多話題,其中之一是用典。旁征博引是好文章的一個(gè)因素。毛澤東、陳獨(dú)秀、李大釗等馬克思主義宣傳家們的時(shí)評(píng)作品,也很
[Abstract]:The main newspaper comment does not belong to the literary category, nor does it need to be deliberately treated as a literary work.Even if essays are regarded as literary comments, comments are also the subject.Therefore, take the viewpoint as the coach, with the resignation takes the soldier to defend, this primary and secondary relationship is right.But this is not to say, newspaper comment must reject literary element.No matter expounding policies, commenting on current affairs or criticizing the disadvantages, we should pay attention to the knowledge and readability of the articles.This leads to many topics, one of which is the use of allusions.Circumvention is a factor in a good article.Mao Zedong, Chen Duxiu, Li Dazhao, and other Marxist propagandists of the time review works, is also very
【分類號(hào)】：G212.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 閆伊默;;深度報(bào)道講好“故事”的三條路徑[J];中國(guó)記者;2013年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：1746683