【摘要】：荷爾德林自1798年起開始嘗試創(chuàng)作現(xiàn)代悲劇《恩培多克勒斯之死》,但最終這次創(chuàng)作被證明是不可能完成的。對他來說,有著辯證本質(zhì)的悲劇不過是對表現(xiàn)為不可能的哲學(xué)思辨的比喻,因而這次戲劇創(chuàng)作的失敗獲得了一個"反形而上學(xué)"的意義,直接導(dǎo)致他在此后所寫的《俄狄浦斯注釋》和《安提戈涅注釋》中修改早期在《論悲劇的含義》中對悲劇的定義,使得與諸神合而為一的"可怕"行為得以被認知和凈化,而形而上學(xué)的思辨精神也得到了批判。此外,唯一能將神圣保存在純粹中的辦法不是如基督般去"模仿"神圣,而是實踐"神圣的背棄"。荷爾德林從悲劇的角度對思辨理性進行了批判,這為德國唯心主義中自我意識的悖論找到了一條出路,其悲劇觀對反思現(xiàn)代理性主義思潮也具有深遠意義。
[Abstract]:Holdrin has tried to create Modern tragedy the death of Empedocles since 1798, but in the end this work proved impossible. To him, a tragedy with a dialectical essence is but a metaphor for philosophical speculation that is impossible, so the failure of this drama has acquired the meaning of "anti-metaphysics". As a direct result of his subsequent revision of the definition of tragedy in the Oedipus Notes and the Antigone Notes, the definition of tragedy in the early part of "on the meaning of tragedy" was made known and purified by the "terrible" act of being United with the gods. The speculative spirit of metaphysics has also been criticized. Moreover, the only way to preserve holiness in purity is not to "imitate" the divine, but to practice "holiness". Holdrin criticizes speculative reason from the perspective of tragedy, which finds a way out for the paradox of self-consciousness in German idealism.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學(xué)哲學(xué)系;
【基金】：“中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費專項資金”(20720151278;20720161047)項目的階段性成果
【分類號】：I516.073
，

本文編號：2209944