本文選題：張愛玲 + 杜拉斯　； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：張愛玲,這個40年代曾經(jīng)紅透上海的女作家在現(xiàn)代文學(xué)史上,猶如一顆流星,光彩奪目卻又轉(zhuǎn)瞬即逝。張愛玲初登文壇,就迅速地吸引了大批讀者,并引起了當(dāng)時文壇的震驚。但是與她的作品在讀者中激起的熱烈反響相比,對其作品的深入研究卻顯得滯后。進(jìn)入80年代,張愛玲的研究論文數(shù)量日豐,對張愛玲的論述也更貼近作品,研究方法也很多樣,從其作品的思想內(nèi)涵、藝術(shù)特性、創(chuàng)作心態(tài)等多方面,探究張愛玲作品的藝術(shù)魅力,并逐步形成了張愛玲研究的格局。90年代的張愛玲研究不僅能夠深入到作品內(nèi)部,對作家的深層心理進(jìn)行把握,而且從宏觀上對張愛玲的創(chuàng)作進(jìn)行分析的論文逐漸增加。本文采取比較研究的方法,找了同時期的一位法國女作家——杜拉斯,與張愛玲的創(chuàng)作進(jìn)行研究。通過比較,我們能夠發(fā)現(xiàn)兩位作家不僅僅是生活的年代相似,童年經(jīng)歷及寫作風(fēng)格都能找到相似之處。張愛玲筆風(fēng)荒涼,偏好寫“十里洋場”的男男女女,遺老遺少,她的小說雅俗共賞,中西結(jié)合;杜拉斯小說的內(nèi)容不固定,筆法冷靜,喜歡用電影的意識流表現(xiàn)人物內(nèi)心活動。她們的思想非常相近,張愛玲特異,杜拉斯叛逆,她們都是曾經(jīng)不被時代認(rèn)同的作家,她們的文字乖張、冷漠。兩位作家都偏愛寫女性“異化”,尤其是母親“異化”,在她們的小說中大量存在著母親形象,她們用她們嫻熟的寫作技巧來書寫心中的故事。母親“異化”的同時也承載著女性的“悲劇意識”,造成這種悲劇的原因有時代的原因,作者自身的原因,但更要的,是男權(quán)社會“男尊女卑”的思想造成的。通過杜拉斯的“入世”思想,我們能夠看出張愛玲并不是真的不在乎政治,只是她采用更隱晦的方式來表達(dá)對時事的看法,但是作者并不能贊成這種“安穩(wěn)于世”的“婦人性”,每個時代的作家都有其使命,我們不應(yīng)該宣揚這種頹廢的思想。張愛玲與杜拉斯雖然是兩個國家的女性,但是她們對于人生的看法有相似之處。通過與杜拉斯的比較,我們看到張愛玲獨特的書寫視角,對于人性、對于生命的詮釋,張愛玲都超越了同時代的很多作家。
[Abstract]:Zhang Ailing, a woman writer who was once popular in Shanghai in the 1940s, is like a meteor in the history of modern literature. Zhang Ailing first appeared in the literary world, and quickly attracted a large number of readers, and caused the shock of the literary world at that time. However, compared with the enthusiastic response of her works among readers, the in-depth study of her works lags behind. In the 1980s, Zhang Ailing's research papers were abundant in number, and the exposition of Zhang Ailing was more close to his works, and the research methods were also very diverse. From the aspects of his works' ideological connotation, artistic characteristics, creative mentality, etc. Probing into the artistic charm of Zhang Ailing's works, and gradually forming the pattern of Zhang Ailing's research. In the 1990s, the study of Zhang Ailing can not only penetrate into the interior of the works, but also grasp the deep psychology of the writer. And from the macro point of view of Zhang Ailing's creation analysis of the paper gradually increased. This paper, by means of comparative study, looks for a French woman writer, Duras, to study the creation of Zhang Ailing in the same period. By comparison, we can find that the two writers can find similarities not only in their life, but also in their childhood experiences and writing styles. Zhang Ailing pen style desolate, prefer to write "ten miles of foreign fields" of men and women, bereavement of old and young, her novel elegant and common appreciation, the combination of Chinese and Western; Duras novel content is not fixed, writing calm, like to use the stream of consciousness of the film to express the character's inner activities. Their thoughts are very similar, Zhang Ailing special, Duras rebellious, they were once not recognized by the times, their words are perverse, indifferent. Both writers prefer to write about the alienation of women, especially the alienation of mothers. There are a lot of images of mothers in their novels. They use their skillful writing skills to write stories in their hearts. The mother "alienation" also carries the female's "tragic consciousness", which is caused by the reason of the times, the author's own reason, but more importantly, it is caused by the thought that "men are superior to women" in the patriarchal society. From Duras' thought of joining the WTO, we can see that Zhang Ailing does not really care about politics, but she uses a more obscure way to express her views on current affairs. However, the author can not agree with the "woman nature" of "peace in the world". Writers of every age have their own mission, we should not preach this decadent thought. Zhang Ailing and Duras are women in both countries, but they share similar views on life. By comparison with Duras, we can see Zhang Ailing's unique perspective of writing. For the interpretation of human nature and life, Zhang Ailing transcends many writers of his time.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I106.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張文東;王東;;論張愛玲《傳奇》之?dāng)⑹履Ｊ絒J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2009年10期

2 徐賁;;文學(xué)的公共性與作家的社會行動[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2009年01期

3 駱冬青;;敘事智慧與政治意識——20世紀(jì)90年代小說的政治透視[J];小說評論;2008年04期

4 黃葒;袁筱一;阿列特·阿梅爾;;我眼中的杜拉斯[J];文藝爭鳴;2006年05期

5 程傳榮;張愛玲與她筆下的悲劇女性[J];貴州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué));2002年03期

6 梁云;論魯迅與張愛玲的文化關(guān)系[J];社會科學(xué)輯刊;1997年06期

7 艾曉明;反傳奇——重讀張愛玲《傾城之戀》[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;1996年09期

8 李繼凱;論張愛玲小說中的女性異化[J];中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)研究叢刊;1994年04期

9 于青;論《傳奇》[J];當(dāng)代作家評論;1994年03期

10 呂啟祥;;《金鎖記》與《紅樓夢》[J];中國現(xiàn)代文學(xué)研究叢刊;1987年01期

，

本文編號：1830633