“為文造情”一辯
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-02-23 17:15
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 劉勰 為文造情 表現(xiàn)說(shuō) 情感 語(yǔ)言 出處:《杭州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2016年02期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:對(duì)于劉勰所區(qū)分的"為情造文"和"為文造情",大多數(shù)學(xué)者均與劉勰一樣,尊"為情造文"而黜"為文造情"。究諸寫作實(shí)際,"為文造情"并非我們通常所認(rèn)為的那樣十分要不得。正如"為情造文"會(huì)有敗筆一樣,"為文造情"也會(huì)有佳作。單方面肯定"為情造文",會(huì)使我們對(duì)傳統(tǒng)文論中的一些盲點(diǎn)視而不見(jiàn)。重新審視并評(píng)價(jià)"為文造情",有助于我們反思傳統(tǒng)文論中一些被視為理所當(dāng)然的基本假定。
[Abstract]:As for Liu Xie's distinction between "writing for emotion" and "creating emotion for literature", most scholars are the same as Liu Xie. Respect "creating text for emotion" and depose "creating emotion for literature". In fact, "creating emotion for writing" is not as important as we usually think. Just as "creating text for emotion" will fail, so will "creating emotion for literature" have good works. Unilateral affirmation of "creating material for emotion" will make us ignore some blind spots in traditional literary theory. Reexamining and evaluating "creating emotion for writing" will help us to reflect on some basic assumptions which are taken for granted in traditional literary theory.
【作者單位】: 天津師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】:天津市藝術(shù)科學(xué)研究規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“走出民族政治:中國(guó)古典美學(xué)研究思路之反思”(52WN1210)的研究成果
【分類號(hào)】:I106
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 傅紀(jì)輝;;藝術(shù)必須有真情才能感動(dòng)人[J];時(shí)代文學(xué)(下半月);2010年05期
2 楊霞琴;;眼處心生句自神——與自學(xué)者談寫作的“準(zhǔn)備功夫”[J];中文自修;1995年06期
3 陳先義;春天的禮贊[J];中國(guó)校園文學(xué);2005年05期
4 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號(hào):1526934
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/1526934.html
最近更新
教材專著